No land combat phase !?

Post bug reports and ask for support here.

Moderator: MOD_EIA

Post Reply
and2
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:51 am

No land combat phase !?

Post by and2 »

Hey all

Hoping to get some help here. Problem is basicly that EIA skips the Land combat phase, and goes to next month's diplomacy, unless there's a field battle in the rural province.

So if the defender, say Nassau only has a garrison and I want to do a assult on the city the game wont let me.

Either, if only siege battles, it skips land combat phase or after a field battle it says no forces eligiable even when there is a corps, with movements points/depot(normal) supply in the province

I tried verson 1.047 and 1.053, I tried redownload, reboots and cleaned the registry and like 10 reinstalls

The really strange thing is that at first it worked, but then around november 1805 as France the bug started and now it persists no matter what I do.

Anyone have a clue? Is EIA dependent on som thirdparty programs like Java or something I need to update? I use XP and yes my java is updated

I could really use some help here--- else I've lost 55 euro and more importantly the ability to play EIA.

Sincerely

And
Spanish Player in "1792 no frills"
French Player in "Westphalian Discord"
User avatar
DCWhitworth
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:20 am
Location: Norwich, England

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by DCWhitworth »

Sounds odd. Are you sure you are actually siegeing the cities in question not just moving into the area. How about posting a copy of your game to the forum ?
Regards
David
User avatar
Mardonius
Posts: 654
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: East Coast

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by Mardonius »

I reckon Dave is correct. To siege the city you must move troops into the city (via the into the city button, which maybe should be renamed the besoege/mive into the city button)
"Crisis is the rallying cry of the tyrant" -- James Madison
"Yes, you will win most battles, but if you loose to me you will loose oh so badly that it causes me pain (chortle) just to think of it" - P. Khan
and2
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:51 am

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by and2 »

Thanks, it worked moving them into the city [:)]
Spanish Player in "1792 no frills"
French Player in "Westphalian Discord"
User avatar
DCWhitworth
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:20 am
Location: Norwich, England

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by DCWhitworth »

ORIGINAL: Mardonius
which maybe should be renamed the besoege/mive into the city button)

Why do you think that would make things clearer ? [;)]
Regards
David
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by MarshallEllis »

What would make it more clear?
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


User avatar
DCWhitworth
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:20 am
Location: Norwich, England

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by DCWhitworth »

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

What would make it more clear?

Making the button say "move into city/besiege" makes it a little clearer. The question 'how do you siege somewhere?' is a not uncommon one for new players.
Regards
David
User avatar
La Provence
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: Toulouse (FRANCE)

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by La Provence »

I have a similar problem :
 
French Garison in Berlin.
Me (prusian) besiege it BUT no Land combat phase. No siege resolution !!!
During 4 months, the game ignore the siege.
 
One time it said "Awaiting opponent file" but no land combat pbem !!!
I was oblige to re-play my turn (via backup ; because the game was blockade at this point) and this popup message did not appear BUT : no siege.
The game gone directly to the next player turn.
 
If there is not a solution for that, Berlin will be definitively french !!!
Salut et fraternité

La Provence
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by MarshallEllis »

ORIGINAL: DCWhitworth

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

What would make it more clear?

Making the button say "move into city/besiege" makes it a little clearer. The question 'how do you siege somewhere?' is a not uncommon one for new players.

Yea, it is a little fuzzy. I'm not sure changing the text would clear it up that much???

Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by NeverMan »

Why not have a popup when you end your turn and your corps is in a territory that has enemy forces in the city of that territory if your corps is not already sieging?
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by MarshallEllis »

The popups become annoying. I am almost thinking about automoving the force to the city then forcing a combat phase. You do not have to besiege BUT at least you would miss less opps to lay siege.
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by NeverMan »

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

The popups become annoying. I am almost thinking about automoving the force to the city then forcing a combat phase. You do not have to besiege BUT at least you would miss less opps to lay siege.

So how would you move them to the city (which I think is a BAD idea, but anyways) and then force a combat BUT not a seige? Aren't you still going to have to deal with a popup?
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by MarshallEllis »

If the land phase were to end with forces in the rural area with a city (With forces in it) then I would auotmove them to the city. This would save everyone from manually moving them to the city.
 
BUT ... you are right that there would still be a popup (in fact multiples). D! Maybe the one prompt would be better ... ????????? Back to the drawing board. Sorry, just thinking out loud again!
 
 
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


ndrose
Posts: 612
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 4:07 pm

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by ndrose »

Even if you're not forced to besiege, you don't always want to move to the city, so I wouldn't want this to be automatic. I can think of at least two instances: 1) when you want to be able to forage; 2) when for some reason you don't want the garrison to starve (which they may if you're at the walls, even if you're not actually sieging).
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by MarshallEllis »

Good points.
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by NeverMan »

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

If the land phase were to end with forces in the rural area with a city (With forces in it) then I would auotmove them to the city. This would save everyone from manually moving them to the city.

BUT ... you are right that there would still be a popup (in fact multiples). D! Maybe the one prompt would be better ... ????????? Back to the drawing board. Sorry, just thinking out loud again!



Yes, if you manually move them to the city and they don't want to be there then they are going to have to decline the seige, which will most likely cost you another popup anyways..

better just to leave it and let people read the rules I guess.
User avatar
MarshallEllis
Posts: 5632
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by MarshallEllis »

I think I must agree with you Neverman (Ouch!) LOL!
 
 
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


NeverMan
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:52 am

RE: No land combat phase !?

Post by NeverMan »

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

(Ouch!)


That pain you feel is called "making sense", I know, it's not common among humans but you can get used to it!
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”