OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and bitter defeats here.

Moderator: Vic

bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

We're going to give ostfront a try lets see how it goes :)
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

wow first impression..holy shit i lost 1349 infantry units :) holy holy holy shit :)
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
User avatar
sapper32
Posts: 1197
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Warminster England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by sapper32 »

Ouch sounds like u got ur butt kicked there [:D]
The battle of Medjerda is almost forgotten,but was fought against highly disciplined German troops and blasted a route straight to Tunis it was a perfect infiltration battle and should be remembered as the best fought British battle of the war.
User avatar
british exil
Posts: 1686
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 6:26 pm
Location: Lower Saxony Germany

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by british exil »

Who is playing which side?

@ bwheatly:
I hope you are playing the SU.
"It is not enough to expect a man to pay for the best, you must also give him what he pays for." Alfred Dunhill

WitE,UV,AT,ATG,FoF,FPCRS
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by Captain Cruft »

Good luck guys and have fun [:)]
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by Captain Cruft »

P.S.

I am really looking forward to this. If you have any questions at all just ask here.
bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

i'm playing as the soviets

@cruft why are the soviets getting reinforcements as RIFLE 41 i see the unit type SO RIFLE 41? ALso RIFLE 41 is using a sprite instead of defaulting to the default icon so (in my case nato icons) so its very odd looking atm ;) i will have to try to fix. It will drive me crazy if i dont.
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by Captain Cruft »

The scenario is designed to be used with the default graphics set, alongside the bespoke stuff in the graphics\ostfront folder. Any other configuration will likely produce funnies such as you describe.
soviets getting reinforcements as RIFLE 41 i see the unit type SO RIFLE 41
Sorry I'm not sure what this means. Can you expand and/or show a screenshot please?
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by Captain Cruft »

Actually ...

I see what you mean now.

The SFType is called "Rifle 41"
The ItemType is called "SO Rifle 41"

If you set a factory to produce "SO Rifle 41" then "Rifle 41" will be the output.

All producable items have a two letter country code at the start, but the actual SFTypes do not.
bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

well i mean you have a sftype RIFLE 41 (sftype #25) which is whats being used in the predefined units you make. And then you have RO Rifle 41 SFType (#5)

just wondering if that was an oversight? :) LOL the graphics for RO rifle are proper the graphics for rifle 41 are not
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by Captain Cruft »

No oversight. Those two SFTypes are completely different. There is also a HU Rifle 41, an SL Rifle 41, a CR Rifle 41 and an SP Rifle 41. It's a naming convention which comes from SPWaW.

As to the graphic issue, all I can suggest is that you:

a) re-install the ostfront graphics into the ostfront folder
b) try temporarily re-installing the default graphics into the default folder, making a backup of what is there first

The problem is that with the SFType symbols you can't see which file it's picking up in the editor. So the only way for me to "fix" this would be to go through all the SFTypes and reset them to use the graphics in the ostfront folder. This would take some time, and you'd then have to then re-download and restart.
bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

Well i see what you're saying but in your predefined units that soviets get as reinforcements Predef # 39 SO RIFLE DIV 41. It's using SFTYPE RIFLE 41 instead of SO RIFLE 41. I can't see the SO RIFLE 41 being used anywhere. Sorry just curious it's not really a biggie i just noticed it when i was going in to try to see why axis units were using proper counters and the soviet rifle units were not. Then i saw SO RIFLE XX were set to use the right images but the RIFLE 41 units were not.

-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by Captain Cruft »

There is no SFType called "SO Rifle 41". The one called "RO Rifle 41" is the Romanian infantry. The only thing called "SO Rifle 41" is the Itemtype as used in production.

None of this is why you don't get the right graphics.

It is using one of the files below:

graphics\default\SFTypeSymbols_Soviet\InfantrySymbol.png
graphics\ostfront\SFTypeSymbols_Soviet\InfantrySymbol.png

Try having a look at these files outside the game from within Windows Explorer.
bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

ok i'm a tard :) sorry LOL
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

i was so retarded thinking RO = russian durrr :) yea i got the images fixed already i was just thinking i saw a bug and trying to be mr helper :) sowwie
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by Captain Cruft »

No worries :)

Enjoy playing the Soviets. I know I do ...

bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

question why did you decide to end the scen in 1942? Just because it so large?
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

wow.

Image
Attachments
t1wow.jpg
t1wow.jpg (134.31 KiB) Viewed 352 times
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3749
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by Captain Cruft »

You get bazillions of reinforcements. The production is designed to just "fill out" the units, not replace all the losses.

The reasons it ends in 1942 is due to me feeling that the model needs a lot of play-testing before developing the full war scenario.
bwheatley
Posts: 3655
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:08 pm
Contact:

RE: OSTFRONT AAR Bwheatley vs arabullian

Post by bwheatley »

question is a good tactic that i can use to bomb railheads to try to kill trains? well i guess i wouldn't have the range eh?
-Alpha Tester Carrier Force
-Beta Tester ATG
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's WAW mod
- Mod Maintainer (past) for ATG's GPW mod
-Beta Tester WITE
-Alpha Tester WITW
-Alpha Tester WITE2
-Alpha Tester Wif
-Beta Tester Command
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”