FOW is working

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
R8J
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee

FOW is working

Post by R8J »

SB2C-5 Helldiver from VT-74 has spotted a Japanese CA at 173,141
F1M2 Pete reports object near surface at 172, 143 near Christmas Island
F1M2 Pete sighting report: 10 Allied ships at 173,139 near Christmas Island, speed 19, Moving Northwest
OS2U-3 Kingfisher sighting report: 9 Japanese ships at 169,134 near Palmyra, speed 20, Moving East

There is only one Japanese ship in this scenario and it is at 173,141.
There are two Allied ships. Both are in seperate ports.
There is nothing at 172,143.
Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.

Who Dares Wins.

You smell like dead bunnies.
John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: FOW is working

Post by John Lansford »

The Dutch CL Java was attacked and sunk by torpedo bombers north of Borneo in my game.  During the attack, the combat report indicated three different ships had been attacked; Java, a "Helena class CL", and De Ruyter.  If my opponent had been a human instead of the AI he would probably be wondering just how many CL's were in that TF.

How they mistook Java for either a Helena or De Ruyter escapes me; it's not like the difference between a Cleveland and a Helena, or a Chicago and a San Francisco, after all.
AttuWatcher
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:15 pm
Location: Hex 181, 36

RE: FOW is working

Post by AttuWatcher »

Playing Aleutians I'm pretty sure I've had my own TF's reported as Japanese TF's a few times. [:D]
Image
User avatar
R8J
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee

RE: FOW is working

Post by R8J »

After the first airstrike in my last test Midway vs Shinano three Japnese CVs were reported in three differant hexes north of the Midway.

If this was a PBEM game and early in the war I'd be concerned I was being ambushed and steamed at full speed to the southeast.

In that airstrike the Shinano was ID'd as a Hiryu class.

I can see the mis-identification of ships. The Japanese attacked the Neshoba (sp) thinking (or at least reporting) it was a CV.

When I was in the navy the majoity of sailors (at least on my ship) could not tell a Soviet ship from a NATO. Every merchant ship was a super tanker. Every fishing boat was a AGI.
Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.

Who Dares Wins.

You smell like dead bunnies.
jazman
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:03 am
Location: Crush Depth

RE: FOW is working

Post by jazman »

ORIGINAL: R8J


When I was in the navy the majoity of sailors (at least on my ship) could not tell a Soviet ship from a NATO. Every merchant ship was a super tanker. Every fishing boat was a AGI.

And on the West Front every German tank was a Tiger tank.
BS, MS, PhD, WitP:AE, WitE, WitW
User avatar
R8J
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee

RE: FOW is working

Post by R8J »

I forgot about that one.

Every gun was an 88.
Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.

Who Dares Wins.

You smell like dead bunnies.
AttuWatcher
Posts: 489
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:15 pm
Location: Hex 181, 36

RE: FOW is working

Post by AttuWatcher »

ORIGINAL: R8J
When I was in the navy the majoity of sailors (at least on my ship) could not tell a Soviet ship from a NATO. Every merchant ship was a super tanker. Every fishing boat was a AGI.

When I patrolled the North Pac we once had a tanker reported as a USN CV and every Russian fishing vessel was reported as a rust bucket [:)]
Image
User avatar
R8J
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee

RE: FOW is working

Post by R8J »

Off the coast of Egypt several oil rigs were ID'd as supertankers.

And off VA Beach the top of some hotels were ID'd as super tankers.

If it wasn't grey it was a super tanker.
Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.

Who Dares Wins.

You smell like dead bunnies.
User avatar
scott64
Posts: 4019
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

RE: FOW is working

Post by scott64 »

I had one sub be reported as sunk twice now, and yet the sub still swims. [:'(]
Lucky for you, tonight it's just me


Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !! :)

http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
wpurdom
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Decatur, GA, USA

RE: FOW is working

Post by wpurdom »

Speaking about FOW, I think I saw Zuikaku on the sunk ship list before I encountered it in a crippled state and sunk it (again?).
BoneMaru
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:54 pm

RE: FOW is working

Post by BoneMaru »

I think Japs reported a CV sinking at Coral Sea, in reality was the replenish tanker. Adds to fog of war imo.
User avatar
Swayin
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA

RE: FOW is working

Post by Swayin »

ORIGINAL: John Lansford
How they mistook Java for either a Helena or De Ruyter escapes me; it's not like the difference between a Cleveland and a Helena, or a Chicago and a San Francisco, after all.


I remember reading in "Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors" (perhaps the best book I've ever read on WW II naval surface combat, BTW) that a Japanese VADM was sure he was locked in a running gun duel with US CAs ... and the reality was it was a couple of Fletchers and a DE...pretty common occurence.
The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves

Image
User avatar
Tazo
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:31 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: FOW is working

Post by Tazo »


I agree, FOW works well !

After 2 months of Guadalcanal campaign I had a "certain" idea of which jap ships mine were
able to sunk and this was confirmed by the "list of sunk ships" in the menu counting the points.

But...

I looked at the current turn from the other side just to figure out if it was worth continuing
after very intense operations and then... surprise, some of the actually sunk ships were quiet
different, not the same name or class, and my score was three times the one I believed in.

Indeed the zui and the sho I pursued after our last battle 31 sept' (when they escaped thanks
to bad weather)... were sunk just after the attacks (the date and location are listed and true for
the active side), so my planes under the stormy weather failed to see this, and this is why I only
succeeded in attacking a CA/DD surface TF retiring the next two days, I was not happy since I
especially micromanaged all the sector recos to catch them again... So the FOW is working and
the reports are really likely to provide bad infos ! Or missing some important ones ! I'm not sure
how I will have learned this "two CV sunk" later... and with my Wasp suddenly sunk during the
night by a submarine thus letting the Saratoga alone while waiting 40 and 70 days the 2 others
CV being repaired, I would have hard time under this frustrating uncertainty with respect to the
severely damaged jap CVs. Great simulation of FOW, with major impact on the player's decisions !

Likewise, the reco of this jap turn showed some of the "sighted ships" hex I knew to be empty.

Also, some busy days my pilots reported the Yamato everywhere, say in two TFs ! I damaged
then even sunk her after multi-dive bombings... several times in different locations ! And indeed
she was returned in a port, only lightly damaged, while another BB was sunk and another back
home for long repair.

As IRL we have to be careful with reports and try to proceed by logical deduction. [&o]
So I can imagine large scale uncertainty during the full campaign... [;)]

( Now I go for a second Guadal this time played entirely to report to Andy the long range performance
of the AI, to confirm strengh and weakness - and improve or clarify a few possibilities for the Jap.
To prepare for the grand campaign I think it is worth exploring deeply this not too long scenario I
love so much. )

There is only two kinds of operational plans, good ones and bad ones.
The good ones almost always fail under unexpected circumstances that often make the bad ones succeed.
-- Napoléon.

With AE immortality is no more a curse.
-- A lucky man.
User avatar
esteban
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 2:47 am

RE: FOW is working

Post by esteban »

All thats needed now is to have these FOW reports, especially the sinkings, rendered ingame via Tokyo Rose voiceovers!!
User avatar
Tazo
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:31 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: FOW is working

Post by Tazo »


Right Esteban, capital ship sinkings are hard to hide simultaneously to the journalists of
our side, to soldier families and to enemy spies ! Impossible after some delay.

Good new feature : major sinkings announced after a random delay... by a newspaper title !
There is only two kinds of operational plans, good ones and bad ones.
The good ones almost always fail under unexpected circumstances that often make the bad ones succeed.
-- Napoléon.

With AE immortality is no more a curse.
-- A lucky man.
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: FOW is working

Post by Dili »

There are errors in ID that are mindblowing but that is how the things are in reality. Only after some time in real cases with friends i grasped that are big differences in visual abilities from person to person. Things that i could see clear for others were difficult or uncertain.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”