PT Boats are... not that awesome.

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

moose1999
Posts: 781
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:41 pm

PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by moose1999 »

I've had 7 major PT boat attacks since the patch and in all of them the PT boat TFs evaded combat.
The TFs were all set on direct route, absolute threat tolerance level, 1 reaction and with very good, very aggressive commanders.
All attacks were against warships, all in ocean hexes (adjacent to coast hexes) and all in reasonable weather (no storms).
Only 2 of them were daytime attacks.

So I guess the PT boats don't rule the waves post-patch...

I don't mind the changes, the PTs were overpowered pre-patch, but one time I caught two CVs and 3 destroyers near Darwin with a force of 13 PT boats in the middle of a calm night.
I sure would have liked to see them at least take a swing at the underescorted carriers...!
But they instantly evaded combat and a golden opportunity was missed.
Another time I caught two BBs, 1 CA and 2 destroyers off Pearl (what on earth were they doing there...! Well, for one thing, sinking an Air-transport TF of mine with 4 Catalina squadrons [:@] !). Night-time, 80% moonlight. Again not as much as a token effort from the PTs - they ran away immediately.

Anybody else seen similar drastic changes with PT boats?
Or am I just on a bad roll...
regards,

Briny
User avatar
Kull
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: El Paso, TX

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by Kull »

ORIGINAL: briny_norman

All attacks were against warships, all in ocean hexes (adjacent to coast hexes) and all in reasonable weather (no storms).

See if you get similar results taking on Transport TFs in shallow/coastal hexes.
moose1999
Posts: 781
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:41 pm

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by moose1999 »

Yeah, I would expect to have better results against soft targets.
But I haven't had one of these yet, unfortunately.
But it seems like attacks on warship-heavy TFs are pretty much gone post-patch.
regards,

Briny
John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by John Lansford »

Against fast warships PT boats will  have trouble getting into position to attack.  Vs transports, though, they are still very effective.  I've had similar results as you have when encountering combat TF's, but if you send them after unloading transports or those in a harbor you'll get better results.

BTW, why were you shipping PBY's anywhere?  They can fly to just about any base on the map by themselves!
User avatar
tigercub
Posts: 2026
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 12:25 pm
Location: brisbane oz

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by tigercub »

Good so its fixed!

Tiger!
Image
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life
medicff
Posts: 710
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:53 pm
Location: WPB, Florida

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by medicff »

PT boats are less of impact now. Still can use them but usually wont encounter warships or transports with heavy escort now even at night. I have had some success in encounters vs light warships/escorts of DD or smaller with some sinkings, not near as many though.

I also lose more PT's than before to combat during the encounter.
moose1999
Posts: 781
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:41 pm

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by moose1999 »

ORIGINAL: John Lansford

BTW, why were you shipping PBY's anywhere?  They can fly to just about any base on the map by themselves!
They were from Kodiak.
I couldn't see any other way to get them to the South Pacific where they were sorely needed.
Just wanted to get them to Pearl and then let them island-jump from there.
But then these two idiot BBs show up and ruin everything.

This is the last time I put all my eggs in one TF, though. [:)]
regards,

Briny
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7401
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by Q-Ball »

Excellent! I consider this fixed then. PT boats IRL didn't do much against IJN warships.

Against transports, barges, etc, though they were effective, and if that's the same in AE, kudos
John Lansford
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 12:40 am

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by John Lansford »

ORIGINAL: briny_norman

ORIGINAL: John Lansford

BTW, why were you shipping PBY's anywhere?  They can fly to just about any base on the map by themselves!
They were from Kodiak.
I couldn't see any other way to get them to the South Pacific where they were sorely needed.
Just wanted to get them to Pearl and then let them island-jump from there.
But then these two idiot BBs show up and ruin everything.

This is the last time I put all my eggs in one TF, though. [:)]

Hmmm, Kodiak to Anchorage to Seattle to SF to Pearl is still faster than loading them in a ship and sending it to Pearl. I rarely, if ever, put my PBY's on a ship; their range is just too great to need that.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by crsutton »

Seems fine to me...
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
SuluSea
Posts: 2402
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:13 pm

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by SuluSea »

PTs seem just about right right now. Good to see this was patched up.

I can't remember the book because I sold it but I read in the Solomons some skippers would use ash cans and roll them off the back just incase a DD got on their heels. I know it doesn't pertain to this game but just thought I'd share a note on just how resourceful these guys were.
"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
FOW
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: England

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by FOW »

ORIGINAL: briny_norman

They were from Kodiak.
I couldn't see any other way to get them to the South Pacific where they were sorely needed.
Just wanted to get them to Pearl and then let them island-jump from there.
But then these two idiot BBs show up and ruin everything.

This is the last time I put all my eggs in one TF, though. [:)]

There is away.
You can now 'disband' PT Boats back to the pool. Several days (more likely a week) later they appear in the pool so you can recreate them elsewhere.
Rather than sail my PH ones to SOPAC I returned them to the pool and then later recreated them at PagoPago (had to have shipped sufficient supplies there first of course).
medicff
Posts: 710
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:53 pm
Location: WPB, Florida

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by medicff »

ORIGINAL: FOW

ORIGINAL: briny_norman

They were from Kodiak.
I couldn't see any other way to get them to the South Pacific where they were sorely needed.
Just wanted to get them to Pearl and then let them island-jump from there.
But then these two idiot BBs show up and ruin everything.

This is the last time I put all my eggs in one TF, though. [:)]



There is away.
You can now 'disband' PT Boats back to the pool. Several days (more likely a week) later they appear in the pool so you can recreate them elsewhere.
Rather than sail my PH ones to SOPAC I returned them to the pool and then later recreated them at PagoPago (had to have shipped sufficient supplies there first of course).

Ok I have look at screen to check for disband but never can find it. What are the requirements to disband back into pool?

thanks

User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

PTs seem just about right right now. Good to see this was patched up.

I can't remember the book because I sold it but I read in the Solomons some skippers would use ash cans and roll them off the back just incase a DD got on their heels. I know it doesn't pertain to this game but just thought I'd share a note on just how resourceful these guys were.

[:)]
FOW
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: England

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by FOW »

ORIGINAL: medicff

Ok I have look at screen to check for disband but never can find it. What are the requirements to disband back into pool?

thanks

With PT Boats disbanded in port, select a PT from the list of active ships. On right side of ship display 2/3rds way down, between victory value and upgrade option is button to 'Return to pool'


Image
Attachments
PT withdrawal.jpg
PT withdrawal.jpg (76.16 KiB) Viewed 176 times
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by Fallschirmjager »

Probably the biggest nerf is the .50 cal M2
They are worthless now. They penetrate but do next to no damage and do not start fires at all.
Even if your PT force catches a thin skinned vessel they hardly damage it since their MGs do nothing.
FOW
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: England

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by FOW »

ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

Probably the biggest nerf is the .50 cal M2
They are worthless now. They penetrate but do next to no damage and do not start fires at all.
Even if your PT force catches a thin skinned vessel they hardly damage it since their MGs do nothing.

You need to wait until they upgrade to include 20mm and 40mm guns.

I have noticed that my PTs even flee from porrly escorted AKs in base hexes at night [:(]
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by Fallschirmjager »

ORIGINAL: FOW

ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

Probably the biggest nerf is the .50 cal M2
They are worthless now. They penetrate but do next to no damage and do not start fires at all.
Even if your PT force catches a thin skinned vessel they hardly damage it since their MGs do nothing.

You need to wait until they upgrade to include 20mm and 40mm guns.

I have noticed that my PTs even flee from porrly escorted AKs in base hexes at night [:(]

A twin .50 mount would tear up the superstucture of a DD or transport pretty good if the distance was close and it could hit with long sustained bursts. The .50 cal is an extremly powerful bullet and the tracer ammunition would also probably start some fires.
I fear that the gun was probably nerfed a little too much in the patch.
User avatar
88l71
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:01 am

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by 88l71 »

Yeah, PLEASE don't make the B-25 gun-ship version useless now...
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7401
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: PT Boats are... not that awesome.

Post by Q-Ball »

ORIGINAL: Fallschirmjager

A twin .50 mount would tear up the superstucture of a DD or transport pretty good if the distance was close and it could hit with long sustained bursts. The .50 cal is an extremly powerful bullet and the tracer ammunition would also probably start some fires.
I fear that the gun was probably nerfed a little too much in the patch.

Maybe, but that's pretty dangerous pulling into .50 cal range of a DD, isn't it? I don't recall PT's IRL wrecking havoc with .50cals.

PT's should be able to bust barges still though, since that's one thing they were very good at IRL.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”