Better to look good than be good...

SPWaW is a tactical squad-level World War II game on single platoon or up to an entire battalion through Europe and the Pacific (1939 to 1945).

Moderator: MOD_SPWaW

User avatar
stevemk1a
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 10:44 am
Location: Penticton B.C.

Better to look good than be good...

Post by stevemk1a »

Okay, I've got two weeks off... time to jab at the bee's nest before I head out of town. In another thread, the best looking AFV's of WWII were mentioned. What do you guys consider the best/worst lookin' AFV of the Second World War to be? I've always liked the JgdPzIV with the L70 gun. My brother and I used to refer to it as "the Lamborghini" because of it's low and mean profile- the Puma AC and the JSIII are also really cool. On the ugly side I would nominate the British Challenger tank, or the Churchill (Brits had a talent for ugly AFV's, but I'm not an Anglophobe... in fact I still hold a British Passport). Effectiveness isn't an issue - just aesthetic value :D Pretty shallow huh?
WhiteRook
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 10:03 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Post by WhiteRook »

My vote for best looking is the Panther and Tiger. The Panther is just cool to look at - just like my old 69 Mach 1 Mustang used to be! :cool: And the Tiger, for some reason I have always felt that it was the minds eye view of a "Tank" in basic form.....

The most ugly tank I can think of was a weird A** Aussie contraption that I fail to remember the name of. Even though the first time I saw a picture of it I swore I would never forget the name of it. The darn thing was like a metal pillbox with tracks! :eek:
User avatar
Belisarius
Posts: 3099
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Belisarius »

The Panther! :D

No really, it has beautiful proportions and a nice looking turret placed just at the right place on the hull, right size (wide!) tracks etc. It looks like a sports tank :p

I also like the front view of a T-34. It looks really mean. :eek:
Otherwise, the KV-1 is a really good tank-looking tank as well.
Image
Got StuG?
Stahlhelm
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Australia

best and worst

Post by Stahlhelm »

I'd have to say that my favourite looking vehicle is the Tiger.
Not pretty, but there's something about the Butt-ugly menace that it projects.
Worst looking vehicle: KV2, effective but looks like the winner of a "how big a turret can you fit on this chassis" competition.
"Don't make me come down there!"

-God
Seagull
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 10:18 pm
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada

Post by Seagull »

I've always liked the look of the Hetzer. I know that it's armor is thin and that placing a gun that loads from the right into the right-hand side of a vehicle isn't inspired thinking, but they almost manage to be cute ;)
User avatar
M4Jess
Posts: 5078
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 10:00 am
Location: DC

Post by M4Jess »

You people are joking right?

The best looking ride of any war is the Easy8!

why if I could reach my tail pipe I would never leave the house!

M4- an M4 is great looking :D
Image

Im making war, not trouble~

Image
AmmoSgt
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Redstone Arsenal Al

Post by AmmoSgt »

I never could decide if I liked the looks of the Staghound w/37mm or the Wolverine better, so I nominate either one. Take your pick.
"For Americans war is almost all of the time a nuisance, and military skill is a luxury like Mah-jongg. But when the issue is brought home to them, war becomes as important, for the necessary periods, as business or sport. And it is hard to decide which
Kanon Fodder
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Portland, Orrygun
Contact:

Re: Better to look good than be good...

Post by Kanon Fodder »

Originally posted by willy
On the ugly side I would nominate the British Challenger tank, or the Churchill (Brits had a talent for ugly AFV's)
I'd have to agree with you on the earlier British machines, but I think they redeemed themselves with the Centurian (and Chieftain in later years)

As far as really ugly I'd agree with the KV-II posting, or nominate the Italian L6/40 - clunky without the "cuteness" of the Stuart.

Best looking would be a toss-up between the Panther and Konigstiger
Easy8
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Austin, Tx

Post by Easy8 »

I nominate the M-22 Locust for the "Cutest"


http://www.battletanks.com/m22_light_tank.htm
"The problem with the future is that it keeps turning into the present" -Hobbes
Svennemir
Posts: 445
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Svennemir »

I like the T-34/76. It looks just like a tank is supposed to look.

The KV-2... I wouldn't quite call it ugly.... I can't really describe how I feel about it, but when I want to make someone laugh I usually show them a picture of one.

On the other hand, a rather extreme chapter of the military history of aesthetics can be seen here :

http://www.jed.simonides.org/tanks/tang ... eries.html

I wonder who came up with *that* idea, and what he was smoking... and - of course - if I could have some of it.
screamer
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands,
Contact:

Post by screamer »

to be honest ive always had a weak spot for the pzkw III ,but the jagdpanther looks awsome
poep
Les_the_Sarge_9_1
Posts: 3943
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Les_the_Sarge_9_1 »

Just about any early war Brit tank was "ugly"

Especially the tankette looking ones, over rated reason for machine guns too.

I think the American M-26 Pershing or the German Panzer IV F2 was about the most ideal tank looking tank though.

Its not about sleek lines, its about classic tank looking lines.

Unfortunately, it's post war, but ultimately, the perfect tank shape goes to the Patton series in my opinion.
I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.
NaKATPase
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 3:15 am
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Post by NaKATPase »

no one has mentioned t-34/85 yet? shame...
I think it looks even better than /76c
NaKATPase:
Colocalized with coracle in septate junctions.

"I'd love to step out, but I'd have to see the girl first." -- GM
"A lot of frogs are like that when they're young and repulsive." -- TS
User avatar
Belisarius
Posts: 3099
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Belisarius »

Well, my "cute award" would probably go to the Chaffee. :)
Image
Got StuG?
Capt. Pixel
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Tucson, AZ

Post by Capt. Pixel »

Originally posted by Belisarius
Well, my "cute award" would probably go to the Chaffee. :)
Yep "Cute" - but with a really mean streak. :D

I vote the Panther for looks. In my eye, this is the classic tank profile.
"Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible. "
- Stonewall Jackson
Kanon Fodder
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Portland, Orrygun
Contact:

Post by Kanon Fodder »

And, after all, this wonderful game is called "Steel Panthers :World at War"

Somehow "Steel Shermans: World at War" just don't cut it ...
;)
screamer
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands,
Contact:

Post by screamer »

cute award?? the french R35
poep
WhiteRook
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 10:03 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Post by WhiteRook »

Now come on guys - give the poor sherman a break! I know I am an M4 fan and all but to me the Pershing looked far cooler than most M4's. Notice I said most! ;) Some of them are actualy pretty cool in their own right. Um - lets see, which one comes to mind first?? Got it, are you ready, yep its the Easy 8 all the way! :D :D
User avatar
stevemk1a
Posts: 855
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 10:44 am
Location: Penticton B.C.

Post by stevemk1a »

As far as Shermans go, the later the better... the easy8 is the best of them (unless you include the Israeli "super shermans", not in WWII - but a cool ride). The sand-skirts on any Sherman look dorky (I guess they were usually removed in the field, though) the bigger turret and longer gun (how very Freudian!) of the later models make the earlier ones look a little sad in comparison...however I've always considered the Pershing better looking than the Sherman- not sleek and exotic like the later German AFV's but more workmanlike and brutal looking. The German Neubaufahrzeug prototype heavy tanks sent to Norway in 1940 prove that the Germans could also produce a hideous AFV. Any crewmember would be embarassed to be seen operating it " hey!, are those PzI turrets you got stuck all over you? - looks like you borrowed that suspension from the Tommys!" :D
V-man
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Better to look good than be good...

Post by V-man »

Originally posted by willy
Okay, I've got two weeks off... time to jab at the bee's nest before I head out of town. In another thread, the best looking AFV's of WWII were mentioned. What do you guys consider the best/worst lookin' AFV of the Second World War to be
M3/M5 Stuart Light Tank was the best looking. All Cavalrymen have attitudes and this tank showed it. Sorta like a snazzy sports car that *was* that fast and manuverable.
"You see, in this world there's 2 kinds of people, my friend:
Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig."
Post Reply

Return to “Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns”