Those old gambits......still worth using?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
darken92
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 5:29 pm

Those old gambits......still worth using?

Post by darken92 »

Hi

Currently looking at upgrading the PC and will pull AE out to play. I was wondering what peoples opinion on how do able are some of the old gambits?

Landing at Mersing to cut of most of Malaya? How dangerous is this ploy now? Is it a high cost option for the Japanese but with high reward?

Capture of Northern Australia? These seems to mentioned a few times so seems to be a very do able option. I assume it is geared to building a buffer zone?

Bypassing the PI. Going more for Java / Malaya first and moping up the PI later?

Are there any other gambits people have found work or do not work? My own choice is to stay away from invasions of India and Hawaii as they sort of feel wrong.
"I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe...
Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion...
I've watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate...
All those... moments will be lost... in time. Like... tears... in rain."
User avatar
EUBanana
Posts: 4255
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 3:48 pm
Location: Little England
Contact:

RE: Those old gambits......still worth using?

Post by EUBanana »

ORIGINAL: darken92
Landing at Mersing to cut of most of Malaya? How dangerous is this ploy now? Is it a high cost option for the Japanese but with high reward?

Well, it worked on me [:'(]
Capture of Northern Australia? These seems to mentioned a few times so seems to be a very do able option. I assume it is geared to building a buffer zone?

Seems ripe for the picking. Also seems fairly useless though, an Allied attack up through here is not happening until the Darwin-Cairns sea route is open, which means control of Papua New Guinea.

Image
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Those old gambits......still worth using?

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: darken92

Hi

Currently looking at upgrading the PC and will pull AE out to play. I was wondering what peoples opinion on how do able are some of the old gambits?

Landing at Mersing to cut of most of Malaya? How dangerous is this ploy now? Is it a high cost option for the Japanese but with high reward?

Capture of Northern Australia? These seems to mentioned a few times so seems to be a very do able option. I assume it is geared to building a buffer zone?

Bypassing the PI. Going more for Java / Malaya first and moping up the PI later?

Are there any other gambits people have found work or do not work? My own choice is to stay away from invasions of India and Hawaii as they sort of feel wrong.

HISTORY:

The Mersing Gambit takes advantage of the inability of the Allied player to react prior to the beginning of the game. Historically, forces headed in that direction would have resulted in LCUs redeploying to the area and surface and air assets at Singapore showing up to meet the invasion convoys. Enemy air superiority grows as you approach their air bases.

What value is Northern Australia to Japan? There were four or five motorised army corps in Australia including three armoured divisions in various states of undress. Japan didn't have the motorised assets to keep her forces in supply. There were no railways in the north--Japanese divisions would have been limited to operating within a hundred miles or so of small to middling ports. A landing at Perth was possible, but would have functioned more to establish a large self-sustaining prison camp than anything else.

Attacking the PI was a no-brainer given that the USN was planning to relieve it via the Central Pacific route and that air assets based in Luzon would have made all convoy routings to the southern resource area more than a little iffy.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
koontz
Posts: 268
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:14 pm

RE: Those old gambits......still worth using?

Post by koontz »

ORIGINAL: herwin

What value is Northern Australia to Japan?

That base is a pontential "jap killer" Read Qball vs cuttlefish aars and u get
the point.
Amateurs study tactics, professionals study logistics.

"All warfare is based on deception. There is no place where espionage is not used. Offer the enemy bait to lure him."
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Those old gambits......still worth using?

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: koontz

ORIGINAL: herwin

What value is Northern Australia to Japan?

That base is a pontential "jap killer" Read Qball vs cuttlefish aars and u get
the point.

Yes, it's malarial, and has to be supplied via a long sloc.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Those old gambits......still worth using?

Post by crsutton »

All are pretty much standard fare by now. It is nice to see some players trying out other options as of late.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Those old gambits......still worth using?

Post by topeverest »

Mersing obviously can be quite successful against an unprepared allied opponent, be it initiated on turn 2 or turn 20. A seasoned allied opponent probably can extract enough incremental losses and slow the Empire down enough that you gain little in terms of time at a large incremental cost. That said, outcomes seem to vary wildly. If POW and Repulse are still lurking, it gets very interesting against an allied oponent willing to expense those and other naval assets. Allied players can hide their air forces in surrounding bases until needed, especially if the gambit is expected.

Anhyway, high potential reward with high potential loss.
Andy M
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Those old gambits......still worth using?

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: topeverest

Mersing obviously can be quite successful against an unprepared allied opponent, be it initiated on turn 2 or turn 20. A seasoned allied opponent probably can extract enough incremental losses and slow the Empire down enough that you gain little in terms of time at a large incremental cost. That said, outcomes seem to vary wildly. If POW and Repulse are still lurking, it gets very interesting against an allied oponent willing to expense those and other naval assets. Allied players can hide their air forces in surrounding bases until needed, especially if the gambit is expected.

Anhyway, high potential reward with high potential loss.

Historically, you would have to eliminate British surprise. It's very probable the surface and air forces at Singapore would have intervened during the first day under air cover.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”