2-day turns, scenario 2 - ALLIED OPPONENT NEEDED (closed)

Post here to meet players for PBEM games and generally engage in ribbing and banter about your prowess.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Durbik
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:59 pm
Location: Krakow, Poland

2-day turns, scenario 2 - ALLIED OPPONENT NEEDED (closed)

Post by Durbik »

I feel I'm ready to take another one on my shoulders - this time a two-day-turns monster, since I didn't do this before! Looking for a reliable allied general, who is capable of doing 3-4 turns per week (so if you're looking for a second game to fill out your main game turn waiting time - be my guest!) I've already done my initial moves, so the board is set as follows, take it or leave it:

Scenario 2

REALISM OPTIONS: reliable us torps off, no withdrawals off and historical first turn off - all other options ON. Reinforcements: +/- 60 days.

GAME OPTIONS: combat reports, plane and TF move radius - ON. All other OFF. Turn cycle: 2

rules

- invasions only on bases/dots
- no sub invasions
- no shattered paradrops (one unit - one base)
- if you want to move national units out of their borders, pay the price in PP's (Hindu, chinese quislings, local militias and so on). RTA can be used to garrison Malaya though, but not in combat
- no industry bombing in / outside from China till 43/01

Japanese limitations

- turn 1: only 2 port strikes, and I'm going to strike pearl with all fleet cv's
- kido is going to strike and return, no allied cv's hunt (that doesn't procure my responsibility if one gets in the way...
- no hindsight opening moves - Mersing gambit won't be done, Baby kido isn't going to hunt Houston beetween the islands etc etc.

Allied limitations

- no 4E naval bombing lower than 10K feet
- allied player can only move tf's already at sea and eventually disband them. no forming of new tf's, no changing orders for planes. You can however move the Chinese and Force Z wherever you like

... and that's it! Interested? PM me. You want to add some rule? That's more than welcome. Generally keep it gamey-free, because I plan to do so. I never leave a game in the middle, so if you're a kind of guy that want to see a whole war, be my guest!
obey the fist!
User avatar
Durbik
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:59 pm
Location: Krakow, Poland

RE: 2-day turns, scenario 2 - ALLIED OPPONENT NEEDED

Post by Durbik »

wohoo, so many allied generals responding - sweet! Negotiating with the one that was first now...
obey the fist!
Itdepends
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:59 am

RE: 2-day turns, scenario 2 - ALLIED OPPONENT NEEDED

Post by Itdepends »

Hey Durbik- out of curiosity- what does this rule mean
allied player can only move tf's already at sea and eventually disband them. no forming of new tf's
 
You mean the allied palyer can't make new tf's at all- ever?- or just on turn 1?
User avatar
Durbik
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:59 pm
Location: Krakow, Poland

RE: 2-day turns, scenario 2 - ALLIED OPPONENT NEEDED

Post by Durbik »

erm... turn 1 of course. no forming of new tf's during whole game would be... an easy victory!

(I should try that sometime!)
obey the fist!
Itdepends
Posts: 937
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:59 am

RE: 2-day turns, scenario 2 - ALLIED OPPONENT NEEDED

Post by Itdepends »

Fair enough then- I noticed the rule later in some other posts I read- when I first read it above I thought it might be some sneaky way to stop the Allies from using all those reinforcements [:D]
aqui
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:56 pm

RE: 2-day turns, scenario 2 - ALLIED OPPONENT NEEDED

Post by aqui »

I'm interested in playing 2 days/turn scen 2. my e-mail is uomodellospazio1@alice.it
cya
paolo
Post Reply

Return to “Opponents Wanted”