Colonies with negative GDP

Distant Worlds is a vast, pausable real-time, 4X space strategy game which models a "living galaxy" with incredible options for replayability and customizability. Experience the full depth and detail of large turn-based strategy games, but with the simplicity and ease of real-time, and on the scale of a massively-multiplayer online game. Now greatly enhanced with the new Universe release, which includes all four previous releases as well as the new Universe expansion!

Moderators: Icemania, elliotg

Post Reply
Apheirox
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:09 pm

Colonies with negative GDP

Post by Apheirox »

What causes this?
User avatar
ASHBERY76
Posts: 2080
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2001 8:00 am
Location: England

RE: Colonies with negative GDP

Post by ASHBERY76 »

Low quality.
Bingeling
Posts: 5186
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:42 am

RE: Colonies with negative GDP

Post by Bingeling »

What are the expenses for a colony? Some invisible maintenance cost? Without expenses it should not go negative.
User avatar
Data
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:43 pm

RE: Colonies with negative GDP

Post by Data »

They are not explicitly stated anywhere but maitenance is the only one that could account for this. From what I see it's the same mechanism like in MOO2 with maintenance on every planet and more penalties for low quality ones, ergo the negative gdp. I think in the pedia somewhere it says that development will offset this eventually but it will take some time.
...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....
User avatar
lordxorn
Posts: 768
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:18 am

RE: Colonies with negative GDP

Post by lordxorn »

Low Culture as well.
frugaldude
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:31 pm

RE: Colonies with negative GDP

Post by frugaldude »

Ashbury is correct.

From the galactopedia:
Planet Quality
Note that each planet and moon has a Quality rating that indicates how habitable it is. The highest quality planets are 100%. These should be prime targets for colonization.

However any planet or moon with a quality below 50% should be avoided. These planets will be a net drain on your empire’s economy if you colonize them. They will cost more to support than they produce in revenue. There may be rare situations where you choose to colonize a planet with quality less than 50% (e.g. has special resources), but beware of the negative affect on your empire revenue.

Apheirox
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:09 pm

RE: Colonies with negative GDP

Post by Apheirox »

Cheers for replies!

Another question along the same lines: Can you actually hurt your economy by expanding too much due to these new colonies driving up empire wide corruption (a system much like Civilization where expanding too fast could drain the economy due to maintenance/social policy costs)? Or will settling a new planet always produce a net gain?
User avatar
Data
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:43 pm

RE: Colonies with negative GDP

Post by Data »

on corruption experiences vary with each of us, I saw with other players that it can become a problem altough I play with the highest setting for it and never had problems
you will not get high gdp from new colonies for a long time, therefore the taxes are also insignifiant.....in the end the benefit comes here from the civ ships ordered for the new colonies. As long as the new colonies are not low quality, there are no costs for this; the infrastructure you'll need for them will cost you (spaceports and such).
...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....
Post Reply

Return to “Distant Worlds 1 Series”