1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post bug reports and request support here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, elmo3, Sabre21

Post Reply
Cad908
Posts: 1338
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:56 am

1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by Cad908 »

Guys,

I was going to save this Guards Infantry, use two to make a Guards Corps, as per my usual practice. Under Beta6, Stavka is gone as a possible attachment. Is this something new? I did not see it in the patch notes and I do this all the time. It seems that only HQ's under their command limit are included. Strange.

Save to follow.

Thanks

Image
Attachments
Stavka.jpg
Stavka.jpg (166.39 KiB) Viewed 126 times
Cad908
Posts: 1338
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:56 am

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by Cad908 »

Save.

Attachments
103.5Test.sav.zip
(2.59 MiB) Downloaded 9 times
User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15788
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by Helpless »

It doesn't show up because you have enough "closer" choices - HQs are sorted by the range. It should be on the list if you move it closer.

We are thinking in future to make High Commands always on the list if they are in range.
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2/CS-2 Development
Cad908
Posts: 1338
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:56 am

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by Cad908 »

Couple of turns later, and this unit I can switch to Stavka

Image
Attachments
Stavka1.jpg
Stavka1.jpg (165.64 KiB) Viewed 126 times
Cad908
Posts: 1338
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:56 am

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by Cad908 »

And the old one I still cannot

Helpless,

Note it is 19 hexes approximately from Stavka, and the Naval Infantry is 51 hexes.

Thanks

Image
Attachments
Stavka2.jpg
Stavka2.jpg (163.72 KiB) Viewed 126 times
User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15788
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by Helpless »

Note it is 19 hexes approximately from Stavka, and the Naval Infantry is 51 hexes.

it doesn't matter if you reached the list limit of 19 HQs
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2/CS-2 Development
Cad908
Posts: 1338
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 4:56 am

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by Cad908 »

OK, I railed it next door to Stavka, and I shows up. This is the first time I have run into this. Learn something new every day. I think that is enough for tonight.

Thanks.

Image
Attachments
Stavka3.jpg
Stavka3.jpg (166.63 KiB) Viewed 126 times
Mehring
Posts: 2473
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:30 am

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by Mehring »

Which HQ shows up on the list is quite illogical, inconsistant and often incomplete given you have to move HQs around to, hopefully, get them in range. How many clicks is it? 2 hexes. Bring up the list, no still not close enough, a hex or two more, etc etc etc. Poor design, sorry. Why not type the HQ you want for a unit into a box and get a message if you spell it wrong, otherwise just attach the unit as you wish?
“Old age is the most unexpected of all things that can happen to a man.”
-Leon Trotsky
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by carnifex »

ORIGINAL: Mehring

Which HQ shows up on the list is quite illogical, inconsistant ....

ORIGINAL: Helpless

HQs are sorted by the range
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: 1.03Beta6 Stavka Attatchment

Post by pompack »

ORIGINAL: carnifex

ORIGINAL: Mehring

Which HQ shows up on the list is quite illogical, inconsistant ....

ORIGINAL: Helpless

HQs are sorted by the range


Also range is the key parameter for me when I am transferring a combat unit from one HQ to another
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”