Mutual Defence : broken ?

Distant Worlds is a vast, pausable real-time, 4X space strategy game which models a "living galaxy" with incredible options for replayability and customizability. Experience the full depth and detail of large turn-based strategy games, but with the simplicity and ease of real-time, and on the scale of a massively-multiplayer online game. Now greatly enhanced with the new Universe release, which includes all four previous releases as well as the new Universe expansion!

Moderators: elliotg, Icemania

Post Reply
ThierryBis
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:44 pm

Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by ThierryBis »

Hi !

Playing as Securan I accepted a defense pact from a human empire with whom I had a long good relationship.
Just a few moments after, they started picking my colonies, one after the other... with a relation score that kept rising !
Nice :(

Is this supposed to happen or is it a huge bug ? If a defence partner can backstab you, it should give them a huge reputation hit and gives you some 'war' casus belli at once
User avatar
Cvan
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:20 pm
Location: Deep Space Nine

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Cvan »

Yea they suffer from Romulan syndrome aka low loyalty. They get jealous of your awesome empire and then they behave like spoiled kids. Hypocritical bastards! Happened to me few times. You should consider about checking if you have some of your bases in their systems, apparently they don't like it.
Truth is an excuse for a lack of imagination.
User avatar
cookie monster
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Birmingham,England

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by cookie monster »

This bug was supposed to have been fixed in the latest DWROTS patch.

Join in on the new tech support thread discussing the very same issue here

tm.asp?m=2786608
User avatar
Cvan
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:20 pm
Location: Deep Space Nine

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Cvan »

I asked few weeks ago. I was told it wasn't really a bug.
Truth is an excuse for a lack of imagination.
User avatar
Kayoz
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Timbuktu
Contact:

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Kayoz »

ORIGINAL: Cvan

I asked few weeks ago. I was told it wasn't really a bug.

It isn't? Sounds like a bug. Can you provide a link to the thread where you were told it wasn't a bug?
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” ― Christopher Hitchens
User avatar
Cvan
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:20 pm
Location: Deep Space Nine

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Cvan »

tm.asp?m=2752074

Maybe I understood it wrong?
Truth is an excuse for a lack of imagination.
User avatar
Kayoz
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Timbuktu
Contact:

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Kayoz »

I think the question remains of what happened before the attacks started. As Data proposed, AoE weapons in your case may have triggered their attacks.

However, it sounds from ThierryBis' post, that the attacks are happening without any provocation - indicated by the rising relationship score - and they're more serious, in that it's not just pot-shots at ships, but colony invasions.

The root of the problem is probably the same, however - AI behaviour inconsistent with your relationship score. If it's AoE weapons, then one should see decreasing relationship scores, imo. As well, invasions of colonies should result in a declaration of war rather than increasing relationship score and a maintenance of the MD pact. Since neither is being seen by either of you - I'd surmise that it's a bug.

Should be bumped in the tech support forum as a bug that was "reported as fixed but not fixed". However, ThierryBis doesn't indicate his DW version, so he may very well be using an out of date file.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” ― Christopher Hitchens
User avatar
cookie monster
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Birmingham,England

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by cookie monster »

All of the suggestions why you were attacked are valid in the other thread. However the MDP should make sure no attacks are made. I presume that's what the patch addressed. If it's still happening on the newest patch then bug report it.
User avatar
Kayoz
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Timbuktu
Contact:

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Kayoz »

ORIGINAL: cookie monster

All of the suggestions why you were attacked are valid in the other thread. However the MDP should make sure no attacks are made. I presume that's what the patch addressed. If it's still happening on the newest patch then bug report it.

Like I said - we need more info. Description of the events preceding the attacks, version of DW, confirmation of MD pact still in effect while attacks ongoing. If these are confirmed, then it sounds like the bug still exists - but we can't do more than guess without further information.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” ― Christopher Hitchens
User avatar
Data
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:43 pm

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Data »

We can upload a saved game to the ftp server, Elliot can check the code directly.
...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....
User avatar
Simulation01
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 8:10 pm

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Simulation01 »

ORIGINAL: Cvan

I asked few weeks ago. I was told it wasn't really a bug.


lmao

"It's not a bug...it's a feature..."

I saw that on a tech support forum and your post made me think of it. [:)]
"Tho' much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved Earth and Heaven; that which we are, we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts, made weak by time and fate, but strong in will." -Tennyson
User avatar
Kayoz
Posts: 1516
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Timbuktu
Contact:

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Kayoz »

ORIGINAL: Simulation01

lmao

"It's not a bug...it's a feature..."

I saw that on a tech support forum and your post made me think of it. [:)]

To be fair, none of the WAD speculation in this has been posted by anyone from Matrix. In most cases, once Elliot has enough information to identify the bug, he's been quick to announce a fix, or at least that one is in the works. Compare this to the forum responses for the Total War series, where the forum moderators routinely disparage any complaints as "as designed" or try to redefine the definition of "bug" to something so nebulous that anything short of a blue screen isn't a defect. Elliot's response has been quite refreshing in comparison. I hope the "feature not a bug" isn't something you've seen here, posted by anyone with a Matrix avatar.

The biggest help anyone posting a bug can give is a save game that reproduces the issue. Barring that, a detailed description of the bug so he can narrow his code inspection. Factors like race v race, government types and events leading up to the issue can give him a lot of help in identifying the bug. However, this isn't always provided - it's quite common that people fail to even indicate what version they're running. How is he to identify the issue, if he doesn't even know what pin to compare it to?
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” ― Christopher Hitchens
User avatar
Simulation01
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 8:10 pm

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Simulation01 »

ORIGINAL: Kayoz

ORIGINAL: Simulation01

lmao

"It's not a bug...it's a feature..."

I saw that on a tech support forum and your post made me think of it. [:)]

To be fair, none of the WAD speculation in this has been posted by anyone from Matrix. In most cases, once Elliot has enough information to identify the bug, he's been quick to announce a fix, or at least that one is in the works. Compare this to the forum responses for the Total War series, where the forum moderators routinely disparage any complaints as "as designed" or try to redefine the definition of "bug" to something so nebulous that anything short of a blue screen isn't a defect. Elliot's response has been quite refreshing in comparison. I hope the "feature not a bug" isn't something you've seen here, posted by anyone with a Matrix avatar.

The biggest help anyone posting a bug can give is a save game that reproduces the issue. Barring that, a detailed description of the bug so he can narrow his code inspection. Factors like race v race, government types and events leading up to the issue can give him a lot of help in identifying the bug. However, this isn't always provided - it's quite common that people fail to even indicate what version they're running. How is he to identify the issue, if he doesn't even know what pin to compare it to?



No, CodeForce is not Microsoft. Codeforce does indeed seem to acknowledge issues and attempt to deal with them.
"Tho' much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved Earth and Heaven; that which we are, we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts, made weak by time and fate, but strong in will." -Tennyson
User avatar
cookie monster
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Birmingham,England

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by cookie monster »

I have just had my long standing MDP Ally invade a colony of mine in ROTS 1.05.08.

I've created a tech support thread here tm.asp?m=2788219&mpage=1&key=&#2788219

I also cross referenced this thread.

BTW as a quick workaround until it gets patched away...You can always change the colony ownership back to yours with the EVIL editor!
ollobrains
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:43 pm

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by ollobrains »

EVIL editor seems to be the best way currently
User avatar
Data
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:43 pm

RE: Mutual Defence : broken ?

Post by Data »

it's not evil when you use it to balance things out and correct some other stuff, or to make the AI harder etc etc
i like that aspect of the dark force [:)]
...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....
Post Reply

Return to “Distant Worlds 1 Series”