Best Tank:

SPWaW is a tactical squad-level World War II game on single platoon or up to an entire battalion through Europe and the Pacific (1939 to 1945).

Moderator: MOD_SPWaW

Cath0de
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 9:00 pm

Best Tank:

Post by Cath0de »

What would consider to be the BEST tank in WWII? Most people consider the T-34 the best tank, but I've seen German Tigers demolish them. I would say the King Tiger is the best, but I want an opinion.
"War is too important to be left to the politicians." - General Ripper
G_X
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Post by G_X »

T-44's

Or IS-3's

There's also a russian tank (I forget what it's Designator is) That outclasses the Tiger I and Tiger II in both Armour and Weapon Penetration, I think it's only downfall is lack of range and accuracy.

You have to remember with the Tiger's that it's not just the tank, it's the Elite Crew manning it.
If you can read this, you're at the end of my post.
SPWaW Record: W:0 / L:0 / D:0
Hades
Posts: 539
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Hades »

"History admires the wise, but it elevates the brave."
-Edmund Morris


Image
[img]http://publish.hometown.aol.com/kenkbar ... tual-b-o-b
Possum
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Adelaide, SA, Australia

Post by Possum »

Valentines!
While not a top of the Range Tank, it had 3 very important things going for it.
1) Mechanically very reliable and robust. probably THE most Robust tank in WWII.
2) It was capable of being adapted to take much bigger main gun than it was designed to carry, eventually being armed with a 75mm
3) Most Important. It was in full scale Serial production in many factories in the UK when it was needed, (unlike many wonder tanks, that only became avaliable after they where no longer needed for victory) as a result it had a production run in the tens of thousands.... and had a long service life...
4) Its small size, and medium weight, meant it was resonable hard to spot, and it could be shipped all over the world without many problems.
Close 2nd, the T-34, again mainly because it was in Serial production in time to be usefull, apart from having good armour, excellent mobility, and in later models, a decent gun...
"We're having a war, and we want you to come!"
So the pig began to whistle and to pound on a drum.
"We'll give you a gun, and we'll give you a hat!"
And the pig began to whistle when they told the piggies that.
Cath0de
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 9:00 pm

Post by Cath0de »

Those 88mm guns in Tigers just outclass anything I've seen. They can tear through the thickest armor like butter. T-34 are a good all around tank, but I find they can't stand 1 to 1 with a good German tank. Worst tank: Shermans. They were called Ronsons, because like Ronson lighters, they lit every time.
"War is too important to be left to the politicians." - General Ripper
G_X
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Post by G_X »

Errr.

No offense, but I've seen a T-34 go 2 Panzers:1 T-34 and come out easily the victor.

These were Panzer III's

I'm sure by Good German Tank you meant a Tiger :rolleyes: Which nothing contemporary could stand 1:1


I'm pretty sure though that there is a russian tank (IS-2/3) that EASILY outclasses the Tiger I at least in Armour and Penetration.
If you can read this, you're at the end of my post.
SPWaW Record: W:0 / L:0 / D:0
Hades
Posts: 539
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Hades »

Since you insulted Sherman I must jump to defend. Shermans if used right are great tanks. You can't parfe them around like you can with Tigers but if you hide them and then pop out and fire a shot or two they do fine. I have seen a M4A3 take out Tiger after Tiger this way. Sure just about any shell will hurt them, but I have seen a T-34 die to 20mm fire.
"History admires the wise, but it elevates the brave."
-Edmund Morris


Image
[img]http://publish.hometown.aol.com/kenkbar ... tual-b-o-b
User avatar
OKW-73
Posts: 229
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Cyberspace, Finland
Contact:

Post by OKW-73 »

no offence, but there was already thread about this very same topic ;) ---> showthread.php?s=&threadid=21734
"You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone." - Al Capone
Fabio Prado
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 8:00 am
Contact:

PzKpfw VI Tiger I

Post by Fabio Prado »

PzKpfw VI Tiger I.:D
Best quality armor - Best gun - excellent mobility

YES - excellent mobility - the Tiger I had best mobility than Shermans, and could do a 360 degree turn faster than hell - this frequently helped with the not so fast turning turret :eek:

The problem with the Tigers was the transmission, which was prone to break if periodic maintanance was not done. ;)

What matters is that the Tiger I could face anything right up to the last day of the war.

Fab
Image
Svennemir
Posts: 445
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Svennemir »

What's the best tank - in which *role* ?

There are numerous factors that decide the ability of a tank.

If you look for raw firepower and armour in SPWAW, KTiger is the answer.

If you are talking "real life", the IS-2 might very well have been better since it was much more mobile and easier to produce (though not just as powerful of course).

If you want a good all-round tank, a medium tank suited for advancing rapidly when having broken enemy lines, the T-34 is probably the best in the war. Very fast, and throughout the war T-34s maintained excellent to decent firepower and armour compared with other models. Besides it was very simply constructed, so breakdowns were easily fixed. These were kings of the battlefield in 1941 (except for the KV-1 tanks - when they didn't break down)

The Panther is the most powerful medium tank AT-wise, but it has only a 75mm gun. While this one is excellent at defeating armour, its HE capability is inferior to that of the T-34.

As can be seen, there is no "one" best tank of WWII.
G_X
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Post by G_X »

Forgive me, I'm not sure, but could someone look in like September '46 American's and look at the Heavy TD section, or it might be GMC section.

Either way there is a massive tank with tons of armor and a gun that I believe was better than the King Tiger. Someone else just go look and tell me if I'm imagining it or not.
If you can read this, you're at the end of my post.
SPWaW Record: W:0 / L:0 / D:0
Hades
Posts: 539
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Hades »

Yep the T95. Tons of armor and a 105mm at gun. Very fun. Nice for stopping IS tanks.
"History admires the wise, but it elevates the brave."
-Edmund Morris


Image
[img]http://publish.hometown.aol.com/kenkbar ... tual-b-o-b
Culiacan Mexico
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Bad Windsheim Germany

Re: Best Tank:

Post by Culiacan Mexico »

Originally posted by Cath0de
What would consider to be the BEST tank in WWII? Most people consider the T-34 the best tank, but I've seen German Tigers demolish them. I would say the King Tiger is the best, but I want an opinion.
How do you define best? The most important series of the war had to have been the MkIV, T-34, and Sherman. All were build in quanity and while none were the most poweriful, they were effective.

Build King Tigers or don't and it has little effect on Germany's war effort. Imagine the U.S. in France during 1944 with Grants... or the Soviet without T-34 in 1941-3... it isn't pretty. IMO
"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lig
Hades
Posts: 539
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Hades »

I think it all depends on you playing style. I personally like the IS tanks because you don't have to think about using them. Just wade in and fire. But I also think the British AVRE(?) is a lot of fun at close ranges. I don't think anything can stop a 290mm mortar. I also rarely play any more with out a flame tank platoon. But both the AVRE and flame tanks are more like armored weapon systems than tanks.
"History admires the wise, but it elevates the brave."
-Edmund Morris


Image
[img]http://publish.hometown.aol.com/kenkbar ... tual-b-o-b
Ivan
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Finland

Post by Ivan »

t-34s are **** in the game cos you cant do it like it was during ww2. meaning that the russians had to many of them they could surrond tigers and eventually blow them to pieces. now if i play with my friend, he as the germans, me as the russians both with 5000points. i still cant get numerical superiority against his tanks to do anything. see when i play with the russians i want to get that "sure, you blew up 20 tanks, we got 80 more coming". feel to the game.
and with the current tanks prices, that wont happen.
Suomi. Finland. Perkele.
G_X
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Post by G_X »

T-34's aren't ****. I can have numerical superiority easy enough with standard Med Tank companies/Platoons, With Guard's it's a little harder, also, I tend to to take low-point cost infantry. I've never had a problem with lacking numbers as the soviets.

T-34's are one of WWII's better tanks, even without numbers.
If you can read this, you're at the end of my post.
SPWaW Record: W:0 / L:0 / D:0
Ivan
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Finland

Post by Ivan »

bah with that crappy firecontrol-goodluck in hitting anything
Suomi. Finland. Perkele.
G_X
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Post by G_X »

O_o


My T-34's almost always have 50% to 75% accuracy when they take shots...


Fire Control is how fast the target is moving, stability is how fast the T-34 is moving.
If you can read this, you're at the end of my post.
SPWaW Record: W:0 / L:0 / D:0
Svennemir
Posts: 445
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Svennemir »

Yes, the greatest problem for Soviets is not fire control but the inability to fire while on the move.

Actually the Soviet tanks are not all that bad in terms of Fire Control/Range Finder. The T-34/85 has 5/4 compared to Pz-IV with 5/5. The Sherman tanks are no better than T-34s in this regards.

Actually if you don't predefine point number for both forces, please note that Soviets get 1/3 more points than the Germans in meeting engagements (corresponding advantage in other engagements). Try giving the Germans 3000 points while leaving Soviet points on "X". In the Soviet buy screen you will count all 4000 points. Those 1000 points mean more than most would think.
G_X
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 7:27 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Post by G_X »

Especially the way I play, High end tanks, like the Guard, and Conscripts, just to have the spotting that's not ****.

Even though I've noticed recently that Tank Platoon and Company leaders are all Recon units, meaning they don't have the 50% spotting disability.

I'm wondering more and more why I can't use Armoured Cars for my tank support.
If you can read this, you're at the end of my post.
SPWaW Record: W:0 / L:0 / D:0
Post Reply

Return to “Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns”