Greater E Asia Co-prosperity

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
zed
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 8:42 pm

Greater E Asia Co-prosperity

Post by zed »

These areas hated white colonials and welcomed Japanese:
1-INDOCHINA
2-BURMA
3-DUTCH EAST INDIES

can colonialism be considered a cause of the Pacific War?

Japans attitude seemed to be, "everyone else is doing it, why should not Japan?"
corbulo
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: rigel 5

Post by corbulo »

FDR did not want any american troops involved in fighting to win back european colonies.
virtute omne regatur
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mdiehl »

Zed. Agreed. Yet by the end of the thing, Aung San was a British loyalist. Shows you how well the Japanese managed to toss away all the initial goodwill they recieved as liberators, and Ho Chi Minh was as actively anti-Japanese as French (and later, US). The best occupation successes for Japan seem to have occurred in Indonesia.

Yeah. I think Colonialism was exactly what the Pacific War was about. That and the pervasive sense that militarism was the only way for Japan to get any respect. In that regard they may have been right. They lost the war but pretty much everyone now respects them and their military accomplishments during the war.

Corbulo. FDR was a pragmatist. Had India been seriously threatened, the US would have been there, or done anything possible to distract the Japanese, IMO. The US, after all, did commit army units and tactical air units to the campaigns to re-take Burma, New Guinea, and North Africa -- all British Colonial or Commonwealth possessions or colonies.
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
ReDDoN45
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 10:00 am

Post by ReDDoN45 »

I´ve written a 30 page long essay on " The long road to Pearl Harbour" dealing wiht the things happening in the Pacific from 1900 to 1941. Of course most emphasis lay on the period between 1932 - 1941. That essay discusses especially this topic quite a lot. THe problem: It is written in German.

I got an A :D for it
Bis dat qui cito dat!
ReDDoN45
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 10:00 am

Post by ReDDoN45 »

Greater Co - asian co prosperity was in fact only an opportunistic (the 3rd and this time a politic) attampt by the Japs to break the stalemate in CHina. It failed as the Chinese thought that then though they would get rid of Europeans, they have the Japs as new rulers. It was just too obvious. Though the phrase remained for the later years, it´s main aim was to get CHina into the Jap boat.
Propably I find the links to the sites where I all read that, to write my essay. Most of them are in English
Bis dat qui cito dat!
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”