The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of Fire!!!

[pditty8811]

The Wargamer has reviewed Team Assault: Baptism of Fire!!!

What's your impression?

http://www.wargamer.com/article/3182/pc ... sm-of-fire

[Xerkis]

A bit confusing. Throughout the article he seems to completely enjoy the game, but then in the conclusion not so much. or at least that is how I took it.
 
I understand and certainly accept the points made on the graphics and things like that; but his statement “They can only deploy them inside a “deployment box”, which is a bit difficult to find—wish it was more pronounced.” That is a bit hard to take. . . . um . . . . . it’s the giant blue box that take up about 10% of the map. How much more “pronounced” does it need to be?
[8|]
 
[font=calibri] Other than that one statement, I think the article was excellent. [/font]
 
. . . . . . That and what the rest of us have already been saying (or known) now. . . . . . . . Need a campaign and need better AI forces to fight against being the top two.
 
Thanks for posting this.
[:)]

[tgb]

I would like to know what victory condition he was playing when he complained about the A.I. not being aggressive enough. I suck at the game,but even I know that rushing forward leads to disaster.

[Xerkis]

ORIGINAL: tgb

I would like to know what victory condition he was playing when he complained about the A.I. not being aggressive enough. I suck at the game,but even I know that rushing forward leads to disaster.

Not that I looked real hard, but I couldn’t find an email for the writer of the article. If I did I would like to send him a challenge to try the game again playing against one of my forces I made for the AI and see what he thought then.
[;)]