AA cover

Post bug reports and ask for help with other issues here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
armin
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:56 am

AA cover

Post by armin »

Is AA counted per taskforce in one sea hex or altogether? If taskforce is docked what has priority? Base AA or taskforce AA cover if attacked?
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: AA cover

Post by dr.hal »

Only one TF in a hex of more than one TF is attacked by a flight of aircraft at one time that I know of. That's the beauty of having more than one TF in a hex! If your enemy launches an attack and it is coordinated, then it arrives all at once and can only hit one TF! If I have that wrong, others will step in. Thus only a single TF AA counts against that attack.
User avatar
Dan Nichols
Posts: 863
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:32 pm

RE: AA cover

Post by Dan Nichols »

ORIGINAL: dr.hal

Only one TF in a hex of more than one TF is attacked by a flight of aircraft at one time that I know of. That's the beauty of having more than one TF in a hex! If your enemy launches an attack and it is coordinated, then it arrives all at once and can only hit one TF! If I have that wrong, others will step in. Thus only a single TF AA counts against that attack.

Incorrect hal. It was true in WitP, but in AE all TFs in a hex can be targeted. Now, about the AA, I think it is only the TF of the ship that is under attack.
I think that the two obligations you have are to be good at what you do and then to pass on your knowledge to a younger person
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: AA cover

Post by dr.hal »

Really Dan??? Then I must be a VERY lucky person, as I've only ever had one CV TF subject to an attack at a time (in the same hex).... Ok, I sit corrected.
User avatar
armin
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:56 am

RE: AA cover

Post by armin »

Thank you guys. And how it works in port what has priority docked task force AA or base AA?
User avatar
Dan Nichols
Posts: 863
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:32 pm

RE: AA cover

Post by Dan Nichols »

They should both fire.
I think that the two obligations you have are to be good at what you do and then to pass on your knowledge to a younger person
User avatar
USSAmerica
Posts: 19211
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Graham, NC, USA
Contact:

RE: AA cover

Post by USSAmerica »

ORIGINAL: Dan Nichols

They should both fire.

That's the way I understand it, too. Also, the AA fire for a TF that is docked is reduced.... I believe by 50%.
Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me

Image
Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
User avatar
PizzaMan
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 2:40 am

RE: AA cover

Post by PizzaMan »

ORIGINAL: USS America

ORIGINAL: Dan Nichols

They should both fire.

That's the way I understand it, too. Also, the AA fire for a TF that is docked is reduced.... I believe by 50%.

I believe that it is 50% as well, but often wondered why? Is it assumed that 50% of the crew is on shore leave, or that the guns are undergoing maintenance? Wouldn't a stationary platform provide more effective AA fire when compared to a ship turning rapidly at battle speed rocking on the waves?
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12615
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: AA cover

Post by Sardaukar »

Yep, 50% of ship AA either docked or disbanded will fire. I think one of the devs confirmed that, but it's been looooong time ago.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: AA cover

Post by Alfred »

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Yep, 50% of ship AA either docked or disbanded will fire. I think one of the devs confirmed that, but it's been looooong time ago.

Not a direct confirmation of your statement above but see my post #12 in this thread.

tm.asp?m=2954005&mpage=1&key=port%2Cflak&#2954936

At least it nominates a specific developer, Nikademus as stating that port attack was SAIEW from classical WITP. That means one would in all likelihood have to go back to the old Classical WITP archives to get the correct answer.

Alfred
User avatar
Puhis
Posts: 1737
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:14 pm
Location: Finland

RE: AA cover

Post by Puhis »

I think that 50 % comes from Uncommon Valor. I did not play much original WitP, but I played UV a lot and I can still remember that 50 % rule.
Alfred
Posts: 6683
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:56 am

RE: AA cover

Post by Alfred »

Getting back to the OP.

1. Aircraft on a port attack mission.

Strike aircraft will attack the port facilities and 50% of the time will also target ships which are disbanded in the port. The chance of the port attack also targetting those disbanded ships is affected by how many ships are actually disbanded. The odds decrease once there are less than 10 ships disbanded in port. This decrease based on number of ships disbanded is also proportional, so 9 ships in port are more likely to be targetted than if there are only 4 ships in port.

The aircraft will face 100% of available land based flak located at the port. Without going back to the classical WITP archives to check (see my preceding post) I am not convinced that the aircraft will face any ship based flak if no ships are actually targetted by the aircraft. The aircraft will face ship based flak if the attack also targets ships. I suspect that the oft repeated claim that 50% of ship based flak fires stems from the point made in the previous paragraph that there is a 50% possibility that ships disbanded in port will also be targetted as part of the "port attack" mission.

2. Aircraft on a naval attack mission.

Ships in a TF which is located in the 40nm range of the base (IOW the TF is "at" the base), are only attacked by strike aircraft on a "naval attack" mission. It is irrelevant whether the TF is docked or undocked.

Land based flak does not extend its cover to a TF. Thus the aircraft will only encounter ship based flak.

3. Aircraft attacking submarines.

Submarines are also placed into a TF, but a sub TF is never attacked by strike aircraft flying a "naval attack" mission. The rationale being that subs can dive. Only aircraft on either a "naval search" or "ASW" mission may attack a sub TF and they may encounter the sub's flak.

Alfred
User avatar
armin
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:56 am

RE: AA cover

Post by armin »

Awesome, very good description thnx.
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”