1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
KPAX
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 7:19 pm
Location: Where the heart is; Home of the Fighting Irish

1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by KPAX »

folks,

What iare the best, say, 3-4 aircraft in 1943 to use for ASW as a Japanese player?
"War makes Heros on both sides." Hero (the movie)

Image

Thanks !!

KPAX
WO Katsuki
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:24 pm

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by WO Katsuki »


good to use some old IJAAF bmbrs to do it

like sallys (replaced by other stuff with armor by 1943)

kate is also good if they're not busy

jill gets radar at some point
pharmy
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:51 pm
Location: Bangkok/Budapest

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by pharmy »

I actually like producing the Ann for choke points (3 hex ASW range) since the PP charge (switch from one to 2 engine) got introduced - 250 kg bomb and uses an existing engine - Ha-5 - which I use for the Sally transport as well (and until my Topsy line upgrades). There are a lot of 1E squadrons you would really only use for training that you can upgrade to the Ann. Until 6/44 it doesn't really matter which bomber you use as the Japanese a/c have no radar (as long as it carries at least a 250kg bomb). After 6/44 MAD and H-6 equipped a/c only.
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by Miller »

Sally or early Helen.
pharmy
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:51 pm
Location: Bangkok/Budapest

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by pharmy »

ORIGINAL: Miller

Sally or early Helen.

as early as PPs and engine economics allow yes (scen 2 or RA). I keep the early Helen for the MAD capability into the late game. I use the Ann for the narrow straits (Korea/Hokkaido/Singapore/Java etc..) and some of the shimas
User avatar
Empire101
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: Coruscant

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by Empire101 »

ORIGINAL: icepharmy

ORIGINAL: Miller

Sally or early Helen.

as early as PPs and engine economics allow yes (scen 2 or RA). I keep the early Helen for the MAD capability into the late game. I use the Ann for the narrow straits (Korea/Hokkaido/Singapore/Java etc..) and some of the shimas

Me too!
The early Helens MAD capability gives great versatility to the Helen Ia's.
[font="Tahoma"]Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
[/font] - Michael Burleigh

User avatar
koniu
Posts: 2763
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Konin, Poland, European Union

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by koniu »

ORIGINAL: Empire101

ORIGINAL: icepharmy

ORIGINAL: Miller

Sally or early Helen.

as early as PPs and engine economics allow yes (scen 2 or RA). I keep the early Helen for the MAD capability into the late game. I use the Ann for the narrow straits (Korea/Hokkaido/Singapore/Java etc..) and some of the shimas

Me too!
The early Helens MAD capability gives great versatility to the Helen Ia's.

MAD is not available until 6/44 So for `43 Helen is as good as any plane
"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
pharmy
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:51 pm
Location: Bangkok/Budapest

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by pharmy »

indeed, I meant keeping one small factory and a healthy stock of Helen 1a till 6/44. I don't think any of the other army bombers get any other aid.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24580
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: koniu
MAD is not available until 6/44 So for `43 Helen is as good as any plane

Yes-this was my recollection as well. The airframe advertisement of MAD functionality is somewhat belied by this. The earlier (earlier than 6/44) are MAD-capable, but you won't be able to fit the airframe with this device until late in the war.

So-that impacts my recommendations and usages. I'll use Helen IIa for the most part. Decent bomb load for IJAAF and armor to fend off the pesky occasional AA return fire from the subs.
Image
User avatar
Rising-Sun
Posts: 2207
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:27 am
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Contact:

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by Rising-Sun »

Well i didnt think two-engine planes would be suitable for ASW, but having floatplanes training as naval search and ASW make the different as well their payloads. one-engine planes are more agile than two engines, most of them are less range. When i had my campaign running awhile back, i had couple of naval search and couple of ASW airgroups in training. Believe i had one or two single-engine army bomber groups as well. But not for twin-engine, only for search and bombing land targets mostly.
Image
pharmy
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:51 pm
Location: Bangkok/Budapest

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by pharmy »


Yeah I wrote the same regarding radar, basically till 6/44, any army plane with a 250kg bomb, range matters only in some parts of the convoying route. I just find it a waste of PPs to convert my all my 1E groups.

MAD and H-6 arrive on 6/44, N-6 10/44, FM-3 6/45 and FD-2 10/45
ORIGINAL: icepharmy

After 6/44 MAD and H-6 equipped a/c only.


Later on the training Kate 2 groups are probably the most effective combining a large bomb, MAD and H-6 and they have a semi-decent range. I'm wondering if naval search at night is any good at detecting subs. Daytime an ASW umbrella combined with some dedicated hunter escort groups seems to keep subs submerged and ineffective (relatively) even if no hits are scored (and you do lose a couple of DDs). Overall day time the hunter killer group concept seems to work the best for me as even convoys with more escorts then AKs get almost 100% while transiting sub infested waters (and I mean real high exp escorts, not PBs)

User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10337
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: 1943 - Best Japanese ASW aircraft

Post by PaxMondo »

MAD only adds 5% bonus ... better than nothing, but not that big of a deal.  Sally or Helen are prolly your best IJA.  Nell or Betty your best IJN.
 
Pax
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”