Loss of division-hood

Post bug reports and ask for help with other issues here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
erstad
Posts: 1957
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

Loss of division-hood

Post by erstad »

I have at least two IJA divisions which used to be "XXX division" and are now just "XXX". Among other things, this means they have lost the divide capability. I would worry they might also lose the divisional cohesiveness bonus in combat.

Is this a known problem? If not, I can post a save but it's going to take a little digging to see when it actually occurred.

This has nothing to do with fragments. The former divisions are still fully intact, and even when a division has a fragment preventing the divide it's still called "XXX division"
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12464
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Loss of division-hood

Post by michaelm75au »

Sounds like data corruption of the unit's suffix.
Michael
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Loss of division-hood

Post by witpqs »

I had that in a very old game but the other way around. A brigade became a division, but kept the same TOE. Heppened on an older patch, BTW
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12464
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Loss of division-hood

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: erstad

I have at least two IJA divisions which used to be "XXX division" and are now just "XXX". Among other things, this means they have lost the divide capability. I would worry they might also lose the divisional cohesiveness bonus in combat.

Is this a known problem? If not, I can post a save but it's going to take a little digging to see when it actually occurred.

This has nothing to do with fragments. The former divisions are still fully intact, and even when a division has a fragment preventing the divide it's still called "XXX division"
Post a save and I can confirm if is data issue or something else?
Michael
erstad
Posts: 1957
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

RE: Loss of division-hood

Post by erstad »

I plan to, I just need to spend some time to find out what turn it happened on.
erstad
Posts: 1957
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

RE: Loss of division-hood

Post by erstad »

OK, here's the save. My save from before i sent to the allied player shows the 116th as a division, I run this turn under what labels itself as 1.0.6.1108r6, and it is no longer a division.

The 39th probably undivisioned this turn as well, but I focused on the 116th to narrow this down.

Attachments
wpae003.zip
(3.21 MiB) Downloaded 9 times
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12464
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Loss of division-hood

Post by michaelm75au »

Good news is it doesn't happen under 1119.
Bad news is I can't trace it under 1108r6 as that is ever before the last official patch (1108r9).
Hard to tell if any of the later fixes corrected this before r9.
Michael
User avatar
SuluSea
Posts: 2414
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:13 pm

RE: Loss of division-hood

Post by SuluSea »

This happened to me as well with the 48th Division, game started with patch 1108r9. I'm glad you got it straight Micheal.


Image
"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”