A remark about artillery movement

[Kel]

I do not understand why the super heavy artillery group uses motorized movement type while the regimental field artillery uses foot movement type.

Basically these siege weapons were immobile behemoth and did not enjoy the same operational mobility as their (and I am of course not even speaking of cross-country mobility on russian roads here...)

This option results in curious movement rates where these heavy tubes can blitz across the map as quickly as a panzer division from besieged city to besieged city while historically they took weeks to deploy, and only on railroads.

Though it is very funny, this flexibility and quickness seem to be a bit ahistorical.

That is why a change of their movement type/lowering of their movement rate and a higher price for strategic relocation would be most welcome IMHO.

Thank you.

[jonny211]

Would there be a method of moving them by rail only? Maybe give them no movement points and force them to relocate by train.

[Hugolin]

It'd be awesome yes.