The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Miller »

-----------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Pearl Harbor , at 180,107

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 93 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 31 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 68
B5N2 Kate x 144
D3A1 Val x 126

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 8 damaged
A6M2 Zero: 11 destroyed by flak
B5N2 Kate: 6 damaged
B5N2 Kate: 3 destroyed by flak
D3A1 Val: 14 damaged
D3A1 Val: 2 destroyed by flak

Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Warhawk: 1 destroyed, 64 damaged
P-40B Warhawk: 7 destroyed on ground
PBY-5 Catalina: 111 damaged
PBY-5 Catalina: 18 destroyed on ground
F4F-3 Wildcat: 10 damaged
F4F-3 Wildcat: 1 destroyed on ground
A-20A Havoc: 19 damaged
A-20A Havoc: 3 destroyed on ground
SBD-1 Dauntless: 29 damaged
SBD-1 Dauntless: 6 destroyed on ground
B-18A Bolo: 47 damaged
B-18A Bolo: 8 destroyed on ground
B-17D Fortress: 52 damaged
B-17D Fortress: 6 destroyed on ground
B-17E Fortress: 17 damaged
B-17E Fortress: 2 destroyed on ground
P-36A Mohawk: 21 damaged
P-36A Mohawk: 3 destroyed on ground
O-47A: 5 damaged
O-47A: 2 destroyed on ground
R3D-2: 1 destroyed on ground
C-33: 2 damaged
C-33: 1 destroyed on ground
SNJ-3 Texan: 3 damaged
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 3 destroyed

Allied Ships
AV Curtiss, Bomb hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB West Virginia, Bomb hits 11, Torpedo hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB California, Bomb hits 4, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
BB Oklahoma, Bomb hits 9, Torpedo hits 5, and is sunk
BB Pennsylvania, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 6, on fire, heavy damage
BB Nevada, Bomb hits 6, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
BB Tennessee, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
BB Maryland, Bomb hits 4, Torpedo hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
BB Arizona, Bomb hits 9, Torpedo hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
PC Tiger, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
CL Detroit, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires
DM Montgomery
CM Oglala
DD Helm, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
AD Whitney, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
CL Phoenix, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
DM Ramsay, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
CL Honolulu, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires
DD Jarvis, Bomb hits 1, on fire
CA San Francisco, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
DD Ralph Talbot, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
CL Helena, Bomb hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
SS Dolphin, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage
DD Bagley, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DM Sicard, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
CL St. Louis, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
DD Dale, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CA New Orleans, Bomb hits 1, on fire
PT-22, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
CL Raleigh, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
DD Shaw, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Allen, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Farragut, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Schley, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Downes, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
AM Vireo, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
AV Wright, Bomb hits 1
AO Neosho, Bomb hits 1, on fire

Allied ground losses:
13 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Airbase hits 45
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 74

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x A6M2 Zero bombing from 100 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 60 kg GP Bomb
4 x D3A1 Val releasing from 2000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
24 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Port Attack: 1 x 18in Type 91 Torpedo
4 x D3A1 Val releasing from 2000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
26 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Port Attack: 1 x 18in Type 91 Torpedo
4 x A6M2 Zero sweeping at 15000 feet
13 x D3A1 Val releasing from 3000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
17 x B5N2 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Port Attack: 1 x 18in Type 91 Torpedo
4 x A6M2 Zero sweeping at 15000 feet
15 x D3A1 Val releasing from 2000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
18 x B5N2 Kate bombing from 9000 feet
Port Attack: 1 x 800 kg AP Bomb
11 x D3A1 Val releasing from 2000'
Airfield Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
27 x B5N2 Kate bombing from 9000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
7 x D3A1 Val releasing from 1000'
Airfield Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
27 x B5N2 Kate bombing from 9000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
8 x D3A1 Val releasing from 1000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
11 x A6M2 Zero bombing from 100 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 60 kg GP Bomb
14 x D3A1 Val releasing from 3000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
6 x D3A1 Val releasing from 3000'
Airfield Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
13 x D3A1 Val releasing from 3000'
Airfield Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
5 x D3A1 Val releasing from 3000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
7 x D3A1 Val releasing from 1000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
1 x D3A1 Val releasing from 1000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
4 x D3A1 Val releasing from 2000'
Port Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
8 x D3A1 Val releasing from 1000'
Airfield Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb
4 x D3A1 Val releasing from 2000'
Airfield Attack: 1 x 250 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
18th PG/73rd PS with P-40B Warhawk (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000
Raid is overhead

Training flight from 18th PG/73rd PS has been caught up in attack
Magazine explodes on BB Oklahoma



I'm in shock lol.......
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12618
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Sardaukar »

You really had some interesting die rolls there... [X(]
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Shellshock »

Ouch. [X(]

Flight Leader to Admiral Nagumo. Third strike not necessary. Party with sake instead.
HexHead
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:27 pm
Location: I'm from New Hampshire; I only work in cyberspace

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by HexHead »

Oh, don't feel bad. I resurrected a PbeM game that Lokasenna and I are restarting from late Jan 42 and the original IJ player had gotten some really good bounces on his initial (ahistorical) attack.

Six BBs gone, sunk, off the board, bye-bye.

That hurts & puts a crimp in Surface capabilities for months and months.
"Goddamn it, they're gittin' away!!"
- unknown tincan sailor near the end of Leyte Gulf, when Kurita retired
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Miller »

49 hits from 67 torpedoes launched[X(]
User avatar
Capt Hornblower
Posts: 244
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:09 pm
Location: Massachusetts, USA

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Capt Hornblower »

11 Zeros destroyed by flak? Seems like the AA gunners should have been looking to the bombers.

(This kind of result is why I prefer to start on Dec. 8.)
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by seille »

The number of torpedo hits is really awesome. A dream for the jap player.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Chickenboy »

Sorry, Miller. But as a JFB, I'm obliged to say:



Image
Attachments
haha.jpg
haha.jpg (11.26 KiB) Viewed 351 times
Image
HexHead
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:27 pm
Location: I'm from New Hampshire; I only work in cyberspace

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by HexHead »

Well, I'm not laughing in this revived PbeM against Lokasenna (IJ). Having six BBs gone from Day One really crimps. I have to be much more careful with CA/CL TFs, just one IJ BB with a CA or two can cream surface forces - in late Jan 42, I think I have maybe five BB/BCs available, total.

The OPs results are pretty crippling, if not almost worse than my results.
"Goddamn it, they're gittin' away!!"
- unknown tincan sailor near the end of Leyte Gulf, when Kurita retired
User avatar
Christopher John
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:44 pm
Location: UK

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Christopher John »

C-in-C Combined Fleet Yamamoto to Admiral Nagumo
"You left some USN BBs a float...be a nice chap and finish the job !!!"

Looks like those extra torpedoes practices paid off; nice strike ratio 49:67 [:D]

I am sure payback will come soon enough...
Victory is but a Dream; the reality of playing the Empire of Japan is to fulfill that dream.
User avatar
tocaff
Posts: 4765
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:30 pm
Location: USA now in Brasil

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by tocaff »

It could always be worse, especially when almost everything was on target.
Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
User avatar
cohimbra
Posts: 639
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:59 pm
Location: Italy

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by cohimbra »

ORIGINAL: Capt Hornblower

11 Zeros destroyed by flak? Seems like the AA gunners should have been looking to the bombers.

(This kind of result is why I prefer to start on Dec. 8.)

This is because the default setting of a pair of carrier Zero squadron is: Airfield
Attack, alt.100...they strafe very very low the field, so they can take heavy damage
from AA defense.
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by spence »

Wow...

You only sank or damaged 2 and a half times as many ships as historically and lost damn near half as many planes.

I really feel for you. NOT
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Miller »

ORIGINAL: spence

Wow...

You only sank or damaged 2 and a half times as many ships as historically and lost damn near half as many planes.

I really feel for you. NOT

Erm......I'm the Allies.
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: HexHead

Well, I'm not laughing in this revived PbeM against Lokasenna (IJ). Having six BBs gone from Day One really crimps. I have to be much more careful with CA/CL TFs, just one IJ BB with a CA or two can cream surface forces - in late Jan 42, I think I have maybe five BB/BCs available, total.

The OPs results are pretty crippling, if not almost worse than my results.

Good to know! [;)] From the sunk ships list, it didn't look like the initial strike was all that great.

For the OP: Only 2 BBs sunk outright, but those other 6...are you going to lose any of them to damage control rolls?

I'd say the 5 DDs you lost hurts even more than the 2 BBs. Any non-sunk BBs on day 1 is just a bonus, but the stock of DDs you have in December is absolutely precious if you want to send anything anywhere.

Think of it as a challenge!
HexHead
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:27 pm
Location: I'm from New Hampshire; I only work in cyberspace

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by HexHead »

I don't mind you knowing - I get some decent stuff the next few months, but I have to be careful about surface placements for quite a while.

Can never have enough destroyers, that's for sure.
"Goddamn it, they're gittin' away!!"
- unknown tincan sailor near the end of Leyte Gulf, when Kurita retired
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: HexHead

Well, I'm not laughing in this revived PbeM against Lokasenna (IJ). Having six BBs gone from Day One really crimps. I have to be much more careful with CA/CL TFs, just one IJ BB with a CA or two can cream surface forces - in late Jan 42, I think I have maybe five BB/BCs available, total.

The OPs results are pretty crippling, if not almost worse than my results.

Hang in there. Come mid 44 you will be wondering if you will ever lose another surface fight.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: HexHead

Well, I'm not laughing in this revived PbeM against Lokasenna (IJ). Having six BBs gone from Day One really crimps. I have to be much more careful with CA/CL TFs, just one IJ BB with a CA or two can cream surface forces - in late Jan 42, I think I have maybe five BB/BCs available, total.

The OPs results are pretty crippling, if not almost worse than my results.

Good to know! [;)] From the sunk ships list, it didn't look like the initial strike was all that great.

For the OP: Only 2 BBs sunk outright, but those other 6...are you going to lose any of them to damage control rolls?

I'd say the 5 DDs you lost hurts even more than the 2 BBs. Any non-sunk BBs on day 1 is just a bonus, but the stock of DDs you have in December is absolutely precious if you want to send anything anywhere.

Think of it as a challenge!


I suspect he will end up losing all eight of them.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9304
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by Lokasenna »

Idunno, depending on the rolls... Arizona is the only one with heavy fires/heavy damage. With Allied DC On, a couple of those might live. But won't see action for 2+ years.
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3570
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: The first ever PH attack I have been on the wrong end of in AE.......

Post by dr.hal »

I would still go after Manila!
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”