Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Norm Koger's The Operational Art of War III is the next game in the award-winning Operational Art of War game series. TOAW3 is updated and enhanced version of the TOAW: Century of Warfare game series. TOAW3 is a turn based game covering operational warfare from 1850-2015. Game scale is from 2.5km to 50km and half day to full week turns. TOAW3 scenarios have been designed by over 70 designers and included over 130 scenarios. TOAW3 comes complete with a full game editor.

Moderators: ralphtricky, JAMiAM

Post Reply
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42778
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by larryfulkerson »

Hey you guys........I was looking through the classic scenario's looking for a new thrill and picked out Desert Storm 91 and
opened it up and looked over the Allied side somewhat.......450+ units for the Coalition side and 600 units for the Iraqies too big
for my taste. But I decided to find out about the supply situation and the Iraq side is dreadfull. I don't mind fixing it so that it's again
playable but somebody will have to tell me how to do it. Any scenario designers out there want to share some advice?

Image
Attachments
temp.gif
temp.gif (165.51 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Trump's UN Speech Went Full DEMENTIA! - ft. Christopher Hitchens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTTiuJZeS0Q
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42778
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

RE: Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by larryfulkerson »

The Allied side supply level seems okay

Image
Attachments
temp.gif
temp.gif (171.36 KiB) Viewed 193 times
Trump's UN Speech Went Full DEMENTIA! - ft. Christopher Hitchens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTTiuJZeS0Q
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10073
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by sPzAbt653 »

Could Iraq move any supplies around with the Coalition Air Force having 100% control of the area ? I'm no expert on the campaign, but I think the answer is no. So even though I suspect you have New Supply On which makes it worse, it doesn't get much better using old supply rules.

However, if you want to change something, I would suggest raising the Iraqi's Overall Force Stockpile Level. Making it 50 will give the Iraqi's 20 on turn 1. Its a little complicated so first look at this screenshot :

Image
Attachments
jpeg25.jpg
jpeg25.jpg (45.91 KiB) Viewed 194 times
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10073
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by sPzAbt653 »

So you can see in the screen shot that the designer gave Iraq 40% Shock on turn 1 (why the 80% chance I have no idea). This Shock Value reduces Iraq's Supply Level from 22 to 9 on turn 1. So to overcome this you must raise the Overall Force Supply Level to 225% of whatever you want their level to be (50 if you want it to be 22).

To complicate matters, Event 19 gives Iraq a 65% chance of 70% Shock on turn 2, then Event 20 gives a 100% chance of 100 Shock on turn 3.

Its fun to play if you like RBC's and take the Coalition side. [;)]
User avatar
shunwick
Posts: 2514
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 10:20 pm

RE: Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by shunwick »

Larry,

Check the allied off-map airfields. IIRC they are unsupplied. In addition, Iraqi scuds can wipe out the B52 bombers on Diego Garcia.

Best wishes,
Steve
I love the smell of TOAW in the morning...
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42778
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

RE: Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by larryfulkerson »

ORIGINAL: shunwick
Larry,

Check the allied off-map airfields. IIRC they are unsupplied. In addition, Iraqi scuds can wipe out the B52 bombers on Diego Garcia.

Best wishes,
Steve
Thanks for the heads up I'll move the planes off the off-map areas. Either that or give them a supply point. And the scuds, um.....I
guess the answer for that is to take out the scuds during turn one when the coalition moves first.
Trump's UN Speech Went Full DEMENTIA! - ft. Christopher Hitchens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTTiuJZeS0Q
User avatar
Sertorius1
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 3:19 am
Location: Georgia, USA

RE: Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by Sertorius1 »

"However, if you want to change something, I would suggest raising the Iraqi's Overall Force Stockpile Level. Making it 50 will give the Iraqi's 20 on turn 1."

sPzAbt653,

Interesting. How do you work out this calculation?
Oberst_Klink
Posts: 4915
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

RE: Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by Oberst_Klink »

ORIGINAL: Sertorius1

"However, if you want to change something, I would suggest raising the Iraqi's Overall Force Stockpile Level. Making it 50 will give the Iraqi's 20 on turn 1."

sPzAbt653,

Interesting. How do you work out this calculation?
The answer lies here in Steve's bloody marvelous tool:

http://thetoawbeachhead.wordpress.com/2 ... readsheet/

The problem with some pre-3.4 scenarios are the AD, MRPB and supply values. In my game vs. Iain, Cruasader '41 the supply levels are really screwed up...

Klink, Oberst
My Blog & on Twitter.
Visit CS Legion on Twitter & Facebook for updates.
User avatar
Sertorius1
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 3:19 am
Location: Georgia, USA

RE: Desert Storm 91 ( classic ) broken by 3.4?

Post by Sertorius1 »

From looking over the Excel sheet I agree with your characterization of it. This is a fine tool. Thank you.
Post Reply

Return to “Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III”