HQ Loss

Command Ops: Battles From The Bulge takes the highly acclaimed Airborne Assault engine back to the West Front for the crucial engagements during the Ardennes Offensive. Test your command skills in the fiery crucible of Airborne Assault’s “pausable continuous time” uber-realistic game engine. It's up to you to develop the strategy, issue the orders, set the pace, and try to win the laurels of victory in the cold, shadowy Ardennes.
Command Ops: Highway to the Reich brings us to the setting of one of the most epic and controversial battles of World War II: Operation Market-Garden, covering every major engagement along Hell’s Highway, from the surprise capture of Joe’s Bridge by the Irish Guards a week before the offensive to the final battles on “The Island” south of Arnhem.

Moderators: Panther Paul, Arjuna

Post Reply
User avatar
39battalion
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:03 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

HQ Loss

Post by 39battalion »


Getting back into this great game and I am curious about the effect of losing an HQ unit ( bad, I know).

Specifically :

If the HQ unit of a battalion is destroyed can the remaining battalion units receive and execute orders as a group without their HQ, or do they need to be reassigned to another HQ ?

Are there any other negative effects on the units that have lost their HQ ?


Also wanted to take this opportunity to thank Dave and his team for continuing to support and improve this outstanding and unique Command Ops series.

And best wishes to Dave for a speedy recovery from his recent medical problem.
Phoenix100
Posts: 2963
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:26 pm

RE: HQ Loss

Post by Phoenix100 »

I believe the remaining units will select a new leader automatically. The same as happens when you lasso a group of units to give them a task - one will be picked as 'HQ' (you can then see which by, for example, following the command lines). Negative effects? I'm less sure what, but I'm sure there are many.

I often still see HQ's leading a movement, interestingly, and was looking in here for the latest comments on that but couldn't find. Someone suggested a solution that involved ticking some box or unticking it (maybe stragglers?) but I can't recall. Only mention it because it would be a sure way to lose your HQ if it always led into contact, and that used to happen (along with support units), but HQs - as you may have noticed from other threads - are at present a little hard to kill, so it doesn't happen too often that you lose them, at the moment.
jimcarravall
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:11 am

RE: HQ Loss

Post by jimcarravall »

ORIGINAL: phoenix

I believe the remaining units will select a new leader automatically. The same as happens when you lasso a group of units to give them a task - one will be picked as 'HQ' (you can then see which by, for example, following the command lines). Negative effects? I'm less sure what, but I'm sure there are many.

. . .

The negative effect on a force being assigned to a senior surviving unit following the loss of a headquarters is staff capacity.

A battalion HQ is staffed to handle its own and subordinate unit operations in the most effective manner. A company assigned the duties of a HQ at the loss of the Battalion command staff suffers because it is generally staffed to efficiently handle its own operations.


===
Game Manual Pg. 143.

"Staff Capacity and Staff Load

"Exercising command over another unit requires a certain amount of attention. There are orders to write, reports to read, and administration to take care of, amongst other things. For this reason there is a limit to how many units any given HQ can effectively command, before the amount of work involved starts to overwhelm the staff available to do it. In the game, the Staff Capacity of a HQ (shown by the Capacity value in the Orders Delay Summary) indicates how many other units can be commanded before the HQ staff become overworked and inefficient. The Staff Load (shown by the Load field in the Orders Delay Summary) indicates how much work is already being done by the HQ."
===

Details of the loss of efficiency are discussed in ensuing paragraphs.


Take care,

jim
User avatar
39battalion
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:03 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

RE: HQ Loss

Post by 39battalion »


Thanks guys
Post Reply

Return to “Command Ops Series”