Possible FTC Bug?

Post bug reports and ask for game support here.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

Possible FTC Bug?

Post by warspite1 »

I have Alexander and Gort in France with:

7-3 INF and AMPH in Bordeaux.
5-3 MIL and AMPH in Bayonne.

I am trying to sail a TRS loaded with a MOT or a TRS loaded with a GARR to each port. One of these should be allowed surely?

The program is saying the FTC rule will not be satisfied.

There are definitely no other CW land units anywhere in France - although there was a GARR is Calais a couple of impulses previously (destroyed) and a Hampden bomber (re-based to Malta).

Image
Attachments
AAAA.jpg
AAAA.jpg (417.01 KiB) Viewed 329 times
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
brian brian
Posts: 3191
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by brian brian »

You would probably have to move the AMPHs already in French ports out of France first in order to move a new one into port. Naval units count against FTC.
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: brian brian

You would probably have to move the AMPHs already in French ports out of France first in order to move a new one into port. Naval units count against FTC.
warspite1

I have 6 units available for FTC Gort 2 + Alexander 4. I have 4 units in France (not inc the HQ which do not count). I was trying to add two more - one AMPH and one land unit. That totals 6. Unless I am missing something there is no need for me to move the AMPH out as the limit is not exceeded.
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Courtenay
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by Courtenay »

Can you post a saved game? Thanks.
I thought I knew how to play this game....
User avatar
AxelNL
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by AxelNL »

It looks like a bug in the counting algorithm: both HQ's could be counted if the program counts all other units except the HQ it currently "counts" from, and than from the other HQ.

Report it in the appropriate forum including the save?
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: AxelNL

It looks like a bug in the counting algorithm: both HQ's could be counted if the program counts all other units except the HQ it currently "counts" from, and than from the other HQ.

Report it in the appropriate forum including the save?
warspite1

Interestingly both the HQ were involved earlier in the game in Northern France and the FTC was properly observed then so something else has happened.

How do I post a saved game please?


Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9084
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by Centuur »

You can upload a zipped save game.

You can find the file in the right folder (Matrix Games - World in Flames - Scenarios - Global War - Saved games is where it should be). Right click on the name of the saved game, zip it and upload it as an attachment in the forum.

Peter
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 32296
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by Orm »

I suspect that it might be because Gort is inside the border for Vichy France and the program does not count Gort towards the HQ limit for France but rather count it for the HQ limit for Vichy France.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Centuur

You can upload a zipped save game.

You can find the file in the right folder (Matrix Games - World in Flames - Scenarios - Global War - Saved games is where it should be). Right click on the name of the saved game, zip it and upload it as an attachment in the forum.

warspite1

Sadly not. I tried that some months ago but am unable to zip for some reason. I will try and send the game to Steve via e-mail.


Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Orm

I suspect that it might be because Gort is inside the border for Vichy France and the program does not count Gort towards the HQ limit for France but rather count it for the HQ limit for Vichy France.
warspite1

Right so given the problems I have zipping or uploading [8|] I have broken off doing the AAR to test this some more.

I took Gort out of the Vichy border and the troops were able to land. I thought Ormster had struck gold. But just to make certain, I then kept Gort in the Vichy border and tried to land units again. It still worked [&:] - but hadn't yesterday [&:][&:]

So what was the problem? Yes you've guessed it, it's the bloody Dutch....again! [X(]

The Armour unit I tried to land this time (and must have initially tried yesterday) was carried by a Dutch TRS. The reason for denial of landing was given as the FTC rule which added to my confusion (though was not strictly wrong I suppose!). I guess I am still thinking historical rather than strictly game terms i.e. in the real war troopships were employed from many countries - Norway, Belgium, Greece - yes, even the bloody Dutch [:D].

Harbour master in Bordeaux: No zorry meester I cannot accept ze landing of troops, zat ave come to elp save my country, in zis port.
Commonwealth Army Officer: Why the devil not?
HMIB: Because ze port of, how you say, registration, of ze troopship is olland.
CAO: So?
HMIB: Well zere are two sings in zis world zat I cannot abide, people who are intolerant of other peoples cultures and ......ze Dutch [:D]

On a serious note, this rule really limits the use of minor naval units. So if I have this right, the British cannot employ Dutch, Belgian, Norwegian, Polish etc in any ports outside of CW Home Countries and Territories? So not Egypt, not Ceylon or countries CW cannot co-operate with even if abiding by the FTC rule?
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 32296
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by Orm »

On a serious note, this rule really limits the use of minor naval units. So if I have this right, the British cannot employ Dutch, Belgian, Norwegian, Polish etc in any ports outside of CW Home Countries and Territories? So not Egypt, not Ceylon or countries CW cannot co-operate with even if abiding by the FTC rule?
As soon as the minor country is completely conquered you can use their fleet in the same way as your MP fleet. This usually happens to countries like Norway, Denmark, Greece, Turkey, Sweden, Finland. Countries that has no colonies if you will.

The countries that gets incompletely conquered will have this trouble that you have with the Dutch fleet. Most common countries with this trouble is Belgium and Netherlands.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 32296
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by Orm »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

So what was the problem? Yes you've guessed it, it's the bloody Dutch....again! [X(]
Nice work figuring that out. [:)]



And I would never have guesses it. [:)]
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
User avatar
Courtenay
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:34 pm

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by Courtenay »

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Orm

I suspect that it might be because Gort is inside the border for Vichy France and the program does not count Gort towards the HQ limit for France but rather count it for the HQ limit for Vichy France.
warspite1

Right so given the problems I have zipping or uploading [8|] I have broken off doing the AAR to test this some more.

I took Gort out of the Vichy border and the troops were able to land. I thought Ormster had struck gold. But just to make certain, I then kept Gort in the Vichy border and tried to land units again. It still worked [&:] - but hadn't yesterday [&:][&:]

So what was the problem? Yes you've guessed it, it's the bloody Dutch....again! [X(]

The Armour unit I tried to land this time (and must have initially tried yesterday) was carried by a Dutch TRS. The reason for denial of landing was given as the FTC rule which added to my confusion (though was not strictly wrong I suppose!). I guess I am still thinking historical rather than strictly game terms i.e. in the real war troopships were employed from many countries - Norway, Belgium, Greece - yes, even the bloody Dutch [:D].

Harbour master in Bordeaux: No zorry meester I cannot accept ze landing of troops, zat ave come to elp save my country, in zis port.
Commonwealth Army Officer: Why the devil not?
HMIB: Because ze port of, how you say, registration, of ze troopship is olland.
CAO: So?
HMIB: Well zere are two sings in zis world zat I cannot abide, people who are intolerant of other peoples cultures and ......ze Dutch [:D]

On a serious note, this rule really limits the use of minor naval units. So if I have this right, the British cannot employ Dutch, Belgian, Norwegian, Polish etc in any ports outside of CW Home Countries and Territories? So not Egypt, not Ceylon or countries CW cannot co-operate with even if abiding by the FTC rule?
You can also use foreign transports in any territory -- that is areas that do not have a capital. For example, if Germany declares war on Spain, and Spain aligns to any Allied power, the Netherlands transport can not go to a port on the Spanish mainland, Spanish Morocco, or Spanish Sahara, but can go to Tenerife, Canary Islands and Palma, Balearic Islands . Also the Dutch TRS can go to any port that the Allies capture from an enemy home country or territory; thus if the Allies capture Tobruk or Naples, the TRS could land there. Of course, the statement that the TRS can land somewhere assumes that no other Allied major power or minor country has units in the hex.

In my current game, I have had foreign minor country naval units in Cyprus, Sardinia, and Bardia. I even have a Yugoslav ship based in Sousse, Tunisia. It returned to base there while Tunisia was still an Italian conquered country. It could not move there now that Tunisia is French again, but is not required to leave.
I thought I knew how to play this game....
User avatar
AxelNL
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by AxelNL »

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: warspite1

So what was the problem? Yes you've guessed it, it's the bloody Dutch....again! [X(]
Nice work figuring that out. [:)]



And I would never have guesses it. [:)]

[:-]
User avatar
WarHunter
Posts: 1174
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 6:27 pm

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by WarHunter »

Keep your Dutch ships docked in any port of the UK, Canada, South Africa, India, Australia and NEI. Give them there own port. Don't share. Keep them at sea as much as possible.

If you deploy them this way. Your Dutch navy will serve you well.

Never base a Dutch or Belgian unit in Gibraltar. Once you do. You will find yourself wishing you did not. You might get away with it. Sooner or later it will bite you.
Image
“We never felt like we were losing until we were actually dead.”
Marcus Luttrell
User avatar
AxelNL
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by AxelNL »

ORIGINAL: WarHunter

Keep your Dutch ships docked in any port of the UK, Canada, South Africa, India, Australia and NEI. Give them there own port. Don't share. Keep them at sea as much as possible.

If you deploy them this way. Your Dutch navy will serve you well.

Never base a Dutch or Belgian unit in Gibraltar. Once you do. You will find yourself wishing you did not. You might get away with it. Sooner or later it will bite you.

We like our base in the Caribian.....[8D]
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 32296
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by Orm »

ORIGINAL: AxelNL

We like our base in the Caribian.....[8D]
I like how you think. [:)][8D]

Why did we sell ours.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9084
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by Centuur »

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: AxelNL

We like our base in the Caribian.....[8D]
I like how you think. [:)][8D]

Why did we sell ours.

Why did we buy ours and sell "Nieuw-Amsterdam"... Now it's New York...
Peter
User avatar
paulderynck
Posts: 8516
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Canada

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by paulderynck »

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Orm

I suspect that it might be because Gort is inside the border for Vichy France and the program does not count Gort towards the HQ limit for France but rather count it for the HQ limit for Vichy France.
warspite1

Right so given the problems I have zipping or uploading [8|] I have broken off doing the AAR to test this some more.

I took Gort out of the Vichy border and the troops were able to land. I thought Ormster had struck gold. But just to make certain, I then kept Gort in the Vichy border and tried to land units again. It still worked [&:] - but hadn't yesterday [&:][&:]

So what was the problem? Yes you've guessed it, it's the bloody Dutch....again! [X(]

The Armour unit I tried to land this time (and must have initially tried yesterday) was carried by a Dutch TRS. The reason for denial of landing was given as the FTC rule which added to my confusion (though was not strictly wrong I suppose!). I guess I am still thinking historical rather than strictly game terms i.e. in the real war troopships were employed from many countries - Norway, Belgium, Greece - yes, even the bloody Dutch [:D].

Harbour master in Bordeaux: No zorry meester I cannot accept ze landing of troops, zat ave come to elp save my country, in zis port.
Commonwealth Army Officer: Why the devil not?
HMIB: Because ze port of, how you say, registration, of ze troopship is olland.
CAO: So?
HMIB: Well zere are two sings in zis world zat I cannot abide, people who are intolerant of other peoples cultures and ......ze Dutch [:D]

On a serious note, this rule really limits the use of minor naval units. So if I have this right, the British cannot employ Dutch, Belgian, Norwegian, Polish etc in any ports outside of CW Home Countries and Territories? So not Egypt, not Ceylon or countries CW cannot co-operate with even if abiding by the FTC rule?
You can also use foreign transports in any territory -- that is areas that do not have a capital. For example, if Germany declares war on Spain, and Spain aligns to any Allied power, the Netherlands transport can not go to a port on the Spanish mainland, Spanish Morocco, or Spanish Sahara, but can go to Tenerife, Canary Islands and Palma, Balearic Islands . Also the Dutch TRS can go to any port that the Allies capture from an enemy home country or territory; thus if the Allies capture Tobruk or Naples, the TRS could land there. Of course, the statement that the TRS can land somewhere assumes that no other Allied major power or minor country has units in the hex.

In my current game, I have had foreign minor country naval units in Cyprus, Sardinia, and Bardia. I even have a Yugoslav ship based in Sousse, Tunisia. It returned to base there while Tunisia was still an Italian conquered country. It could not move there now that Tunisia is French again, but is not required to leave.
If France is conquered or Vichied then the Dutch TRS can be in any port there that is Allied controlled, and can stack with CW units. If the US shows up in the area, then there'll be problems because the US can't stack with the Dutch TRS.

So in this game it looks to me that France is either conquered or Vichied, right?

If so, then there should not be an issue here using the Dutch TRS with CW units. It should be neither an FTC problem nor a cooperation problem because it is no longer a non-cooperating major power port.
Paul
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: Possible FTC Bug?

Post by warspite1 »

Vichied or Conquered? Neither, the Battle for France is still going on
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”