Surviving until 1946

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

Surviving until 1946

Post by Rysyonok »

Warning: this is a game versus Japanese AI. Maybe one day I will be skilled enough for a human opponent, but everyone has to start somewhere.

As my first venture into WitP:AE I decided to try the Ironman scenario (stock #10). Very Hard difficulty, 4-day turns, unreliable torpedoes, you name it. The key objective is not going to be to win, although that would always be nice, but more so to survive.

12/11/1941:

Japanese planes are merciless, and 64 allied ships go down the very first turn. Hong Kong falls.

USN is mostly at anchor, as KB is still circling Pearl Harbor. West Coast is bracing for a wave of submarines.



Image
Attachments
AE01.jpg
AE01.jpg (57.49 KiB) Viewed 664 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

RE: Surviving until 1946

Post by Rysyonok »

12/15/1941:

US Airforce in the Philippines achieves a remarkable 1:1 kill ratio in air-to-air battles, but only 13 airframes survive the brutal grinder.

Submarines sprint from Manila, with orders not to retreat. Five IJN transports are hit.

Guam and Rabaul fall. Wake, surprisingly, holds.

IJA steamrolls through China for the first 6 days of the war, but slows down over the last couple of days.

Numerous ships not mentioned in Conway's books make appearance.

An unusual plane is seen all over the Pacific. It resembles a floating version of Zero, but that one is rumored to be months away from production?

A reward is posted for anyone who can obtain close-up pictures, or even technical data.



Image
Attachments
Rufe37.jpg
Rufe37.jpg (36.31 KiB) Viewed 664 times
paradigmblue
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:44 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

RE: Surviving until 1946

Post by paradigmblue »

ORIGINAL: Rysyonok

Warning: this is a game versus Japanese AI. Maybe one day I will be skilled enough for a human opponent, but everyone has to start somewhere.

As my first venture into WitP:AE I decided to try the Ironman scenario (stock #10). Very Hard difficulty, 4-day turns, unreliable torpedoes, you name it. The key objective is not going to be to win, although that would always be nice, but more so to survive.

12/11/1941:

Japanese planes are merciless, and 64 allied ships go down the very first turn. Hong Kong falls.

USN is mostly at anchor, as KB is still circling Pearl Harbor. West Coast is bracing for a wave of submarines.



Image

Holy crap that is a painful first turn.
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

RE: Surviving until 1946

Post by Rysyonok »

ORIGINAL: paradigmblue
Holy crap that is a painful first turn.

You really think so? I assumed anything less than losing 4 BBs at Pearl Harbor is manageable.
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

12/19/1941

Post by Rysyonok »

12/19/1941:

USAF fighter strength in the Philippines remains at 13 airframes, mostly due to ignoring 90% of IJN air raids. With IJA tanks already on the outskirts of Manila (the 4th and 7th tank regiments have proven to be unstoppable), I am considering pulling out of that airspace to save pilots.

Only 4 transports and a wounded AV Langley make Soerabaja. 7 more and 2 gunboats are still trying to get there as well. No survivors from Hong Kong.

Chinese front remains full of surprises. Some battles are a walkover for Japan, with hundreds of Chinese squads lost. Some result in a draw. Generally the further from the coast, the tougher the defenders.

The first IJN combat vessel is sunk, DMS Taneko, a W-1 class minesweeper.



Image
Attachments
W1.jpg
W1.jpg (19.75 KiB) Viewed 664 times
User avatar
Jim D Burns
Posts: 4004
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Salida, CA.

RE: Surviving until 1946

Post by Jim D Burns »

I don’t think losing the BBs is nearly as important as all those Cruisers. All I can say is ouch that's a lot of Cruisers for turn 1. Old slow BBs aren’t nearly as important as the fast and versatile Cruisers in the first year of the war. Not to mention all the AAA the Cruisers can add to task forces late war after their upgrades.

Were the BBs to survive more than likely they’d sit in port waiting until the counter-attack period begins in 1943 before they get put to good use. You could put those Cruisers to work on day two were they still afloat.

Jim
paradigmblue
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:44 pm
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska

RE: Surviving until 1946

Post by paradigmblue »

ORIGINAL: Rysyonok
ORIGINAL: paradigmblue
Holy crap that is a painful first turn.

You really think so? I assumed anything less than losing 4 BBs at Pearl Harbor is manageable.
Oh, don't get me wrong. You could lose every single battleship at Pearl and it would still be manageable - as the allied player no matter your first turn losses you will have more ships than you'll know what to do with by 1944.

I was more commenting on losing Force Z plus all those cruisers, which was unfortunate. Luckily, "painful" doesn't mean "debilitating", and I didn't mean to say that losing those ships on the first turn will give you any sort of long-term disadvantage.
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

RE: Surviving until 1946

Post by Rysyonok »

ORIGINAL: Jim D Burns

I don’t think losing the BBs is nearly as important as all those Cruisers. All I can say is ouch that's a lot of Cruisers for turn 1. Old slow BBs aren’t nearly as important as the fast and versatile Cruisers in the first year of the war. Not to mention all the AAA the Cruisers can add to task forces late war after their upgrades.

Were the BBs to survive more than likely they’d sit in port waiting until the counter-attack period begins in 1943 before they get put to good use. You could put those Cruisers to work on day two were they still afloat.

Jim

Yes... you're right. Well, at least I no longer have to worry about the names for all those replacement cruisers - I'll just have to commemorate all these losses!

Suddenly all those WW1-era RN and RNN hulks have become very valuable.
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

RE: Surviving until 1946

Post by Rysyonok »

ORIGINAL: paradigmblue
ORIGINAL: Rysyonok
ORIGINAL: paradigmblue
Holy crap that is a painful first turn.

You really think so? I assumed anything less than losing 4 BBs at Pearl Harbor is manageable.
Oh, don't get me wrong. You could lose every single battleship at Pearl and it would still be manageable - as the allied player no matter your first turn losses you will have more ships than you'll know what to do with by 1944.

I was more commenting on losing Force Z plus all those cruisers, which was unfortunate. Luckily, "painful" doesn't mean "debilitating", and I didn't mean to say that losing those ships on the first turn will give you any sort of long-term disadvantage.

Well, at least the carriers survived. I was worried as KB was retreating straight through one of them. Instead KB went south east, sinking the 5th USN CA, Louisville, and its AP group.
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

12/23/1941

Post by Rysyonok »

12/23/1941:

USN and RNN subs wreck havoc on IJN shipping, but at a heavy cost. Four subs are lost, about one for each four confirmed torpedo hits.

Image

This leads to a well-coordinated (3 vectors) air raid on Manila on the 21st; nothing is left afloat in the harbor or up in the air. Even recon aircraft are not spared. So no more torpedoes, and pretty much no more flights out of the Philippines. Any remaining units will be disbanded to save an airframe or two and the pilots.

Japanese float planes are seen west of Perth and near Colombo. I wonder if IJN will seriously push west and southwest.

A massive conversion program is initiated all over the globe, with the motto "40 AA now is better than 70 AA in 1943". US Senate hastily approves a land-lease program, whereby American artillery and armor is going to be shipped to India.

Two Chinese divisions are paid off (full PP cost) to cross into Burma, with several more under negotiations.
Attachments
Subs.jpg
Subs.jpg (91.95 KiB) Viewed 664 times
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: 12/23/1941

Post by HansBolter »

You won't need those Chinese units in Burma against the Ai.

The British are perfectly capable of preventing the AI from ever getting a foothold in Burma.

It all depends on if you are playing to aggressively defeat the AI or roleplaying a more Historically handicapped Allied side.
Hans

User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

RE: 12/23/1941

Post by Rysyonok »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

You won't need those Chinese units in Burma against the Ai.

The British are perfectly capable of preventing the AI from ever getting a foothold in Burma.

It all depends on if you are playing to aggressively defeat the AI or roleplaying a more Historically handicapped Allied side.

Thank you for your confidence :) So far the British are getting crushed in Malaysia. Any/all efforts to retreat to Singapore have been ceased, as units are being destroyed faster than they can run.

Another reason for this move west by the 5th Chinese Corps is supply. Starvation is rampant countrywide. All replacements (except for Chungking area) have been turned off, and no construction is taking place anywhere. A squadron of DC-2 stationed in Kunming was pummeled to dust before they got a single supply mission done.
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

12/27/1941

Post by Rysyonok »

12/27/1941:

Midway is invaded, but holds on so far.

A small supply convoy sneaks into Rangoon, and Betties come hunting. The first couple of raids are defeated, and then Zeroes join the battle. It is a tactical victory, but a strategic setback: Burma only has 9K of supply.

An AK is sunk by a German sub U-168 west of Colombo. There must be another one nearby, as Type IX's did not carry float planes.



Image
Attachments
ixc_2d.gif
ixc_2d.gif (16.61 KiB) Viewed 664 times
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: 12/27/1941

Post by HansBolter »

Move the AVG to Rangoon along with at least two British fighter squadrons and you can establish the air superiority you need to be able to ship supply into Rangoon.

Eventually it will be drawn into China.

Start this one Dec 8th.

You will lose a few xAKs and xAKLs to the occasional Betty/Nell that slips through, but overall you can ship a huge amount of supply in.

I set immediately set up a 30+K supply convoy and follow it with another as soon as possible.

Shipping 60k+ a week into Rangoon adds up fast.

My current game is in Feb '43. The AI never breached the river line and I recently added another 40k+ convoy of liberty ships.

Concentrate the and reconstitute the 1st Burma Division in the river hex SE of Pegu.

Ship in 2-3 more British Brigades that start in convoys to cover and start extending the flank and the AI will be stymied and never get across the river.

Like I said, in games against the AI it all depends on how aggressive or passive you want to play.
Hans

User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

RE: 12/27/1941

Post by Rysyonok »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

Move the AVG to Rangoon along with at least two British fighter squadrons and you can establish the air superiority you need to be able to ship supply into Rangoon.

Eventually it will be drawn into China.

Start this one Dec 8th.

You will lose a few xAKs and xAKLs to the occasional Betty/Nell that slips through, but overall you can ship a huge amount of supply in.

I set immediately set up a 30+K supply convoy and follow it with another as soon as possible.

Shipping 60k+ a week into Rangoon adds up fast.

My current game is in Feb '43. The AI never breached the river line and I recently added another 40k+ convoy of liberty ships.

Concentrate the and reconstitute the 1st Burma Division in the river hex SE of Pegu.

Ship in 2-3 more British Brigades that start in convoys to cover and start extending the flank and the AI will be stymied and never get across the river.

Like I said, in games against the AI it all depends on how aggressive or passive you want to play.

Great suggestions. I'm going to turn the Chinese around and try this.

As far as air superiority, it might be a challenge. Right now I have 2 AVGs in Rangoon and 1 in Toungoo, and after last turn half of each squadron is in shambles. 5 losses, 27 damages. I'm starting to rally Indian base forces just north of the border to establish an air bridge for new fighter squadrons to traverse.
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: 12/27/1941

Post by HansBolter »

The Brit squadrons that start in Gerogetown can be transferred to Port Blair and then to Rangoon.

This is a quick way to supplement the AVG so you can get ahead of the first few Oscar squadrons that come calling.

I typically also send the Blenhiem fighter squadron there for night CAP as well.

I realize you are probably past this point by now.

These are mostly pointer for moves to start on December 8th.

The AI is typically slow to get started in Burma, waiting until it has conquered Malaya.

It usually only starts air raids early and getting on top of the air superiority situation fast is paramount to this strategy in Burma.
Hans

Malagant
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 1:30 am

RE: 12/27/1941

Post by Malagant »

Great AAR so far, thanks!

As a Devil's Advocate to Han's suggestions, playing the same scenario you're playing with same settings, doing something very similar to Hans' suggestions, I had held the river line against 15th Army...
...until Singapore fell and the Japanese landed an Amphib force behind the line and crushed me. The A/I can hand out a surprise or two!
"La Garde meurt, elle ne se rend pas!"
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

12/31/1941

Post by Rysyonok »

12/31/1941:

AVGs get mauled over Rangoon as IJA CAP is growing in strength.

Image

18th division materializes in Singapore aboard 6 APs. The 7 fighter planes still in existence will do what they can. I will most likely have to commit the bombers into a suicide mission against advancing Japanese just to bleed off the enemy fighters so my magnificent seven (and the 18th division) live to see another sunset.

Canton island falls. As long as I still keep Pago Pago and Christmas islands, I'm ok. Otherwise we may have to discuss the northern route for the counteroffensive.

Attachments
AVG.jpg
AVG.jpg (27.15 KiB) Viewed 664 times
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

RE: 12/27/1941

Post by Rysyonok »

ORIGINAL: Malagant

Great AAR so far, thanks!

As a Devil's Advocate to Han's suggestions, playing the same scenario you're playing with same settings, doing something very similar to Hans' suggestions, I had held the river line against 15th Army...
...until Singapore fell and the Japanese landed an Amphib force behind the line and crushed me. The A/I can hand out a surprise or two!

Can you share a screenshot of how your war is going? :)
User avatar
Rysyonok
Posts: 2462
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:11 am

RE: 12/27/1941

Post by Rysyonok »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

The Brit squadrons that start in Gerogetown can be transferred to Port Blair and then to Rangoon.

This is a quick way to supplement the AVG so you can get ahead of the first few Oscar squadrons that come calling.

I typically also send the Blenhiem fighter squadron there for night CAP as well.

I realize you are probably past this point by now.

These are mostly pointer for moves to start on December 8th.

The AI is typically slow to get started in Burma, waiting until it has conquered Malaya.

It usually only starts air raids early and getting on top of the air superiority situation fast is paramount to this strategy in Burma.

Thanks for the great tips!

And I might have only myself to blame. I sailed a few AMc right off Rangoon as fighter bait... I got much more than I bargained for.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”