A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

Stelteck
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:07 pm

A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Stelteck »

Hi.
So this a small AAR for my new game against HardLuckYetAgain.
I'am soviet.

The scenario will be the bitter end campaign. This scenario give points day after day to german for the ownership of victory location, most important are moscow and Leningrad.

In previous campaign, i gave everything to hold moscow, with quite some success. Unfortunately, Leningrad was lost very early and gave so much points to germany that it was impossible to win, as the city is also very hard to liberate during late war. Probably harder than moscow.

So to try to counter balance this effect, i decided for this campaign to focus my defensive effort on Leningrad (even over moscow). Even fighting the Finns in the north to secure the area as much as i can.

We will see what will happen.

I noticed also from previous campaign than it is not so important to save tons of industries, especially armement points, so it is not important if south fail.

Let's fight

Option are :
Real(hard, not mild) Winter.
No combat bonus.
Fixed Weather.
Common house rules about para drop and amphib operation.
Brakes are for cowards !!
Stelteck
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:07 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Stelteck »

Turn 1 : 22 June 1941

Our new WW2 begin !!!

The ennemy opening is really good. As most opening are nowadays, when it is not me playing the german.

Image

Image

A little classical maybe. [:D]

Relative to Pelton's opening, i find this more chaotic and fluid, less structured and organized but as efficient. Not the same general personality i guess.

Image

I now have only 89 trained divisions to fight the german assault. It is so unfair !!! Especially as one german division is worth 3 russian ones.
So i have only 30 real divisions to fight 150+ ennemy ones. And i will have to wait turn 3 to beginning to have renforcement. Renforcements that i will need monthes to train.

Image
Brakes are for cowards !!
User avatar
Dinglir
Posts: 620
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 5:35 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Dinglir »

Good luck to you both.

I think you are right in your assesment of the Bitter End Scenario. If the Germans take either Leningrad or Moscow in 1941, they are going to earn a LOT of Victory Points. I haven't done the math, but I'm close to thinking that either city is worth the destruction of an entire infantry division every turn when counting the VP's.

Are you playing mild or normal blizzard and do you have any bonuses?
To be is to do -- Socrates
To do is to be -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Do be do be do -- Frank Sinatra
Stelteck
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:07 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Stelteck »

Ha sorry :
Option are :
Hard Winter.
No combat bonus.
Fixed Weather.
Common house rules about para drop and amphib operation.
Brakes are for cowards !!
User avatar
M60A3TTS
Posts: 4765
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 1:20 am

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by M60A3TTS »

You should check early on to see if he commits either one of his AGN panzer corps, 41st or 56th, to the center push. That will tell you how much you will need defending Moscow.
User avatar
sillyflower
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Back in Blighty

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by sillyflower »

His southern front move looks very familiar, though he has improved a bit on the original [;)]. Not the 'original' was very original.

The eastern part of the centre and the troops NW of Vilnius look as if they can get back in supply unless there are unseen G units that are in the way.

Pelton's opening is not nearly as good IMHO.
web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?
Stelteck
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:07 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Stelteck »

There is a little time delay on this AAR unfortunately. I may not be able to use all your advices [8|]
Brakes are for cowards !!
Hermann
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:57 am
Contact:

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Hermann »

be patient with Hardluck. don't rush troops to the front - the key to playing vs the panzerball is to avoid letting him dictate your movements. screen the area he isn't attacking with airborne and use the infantry to establish fortified positions at this stage I use 8 divisions per army hq. He has to focus on rail lines to continue his attacks that's where he will go use recon to track his 4 construction brigades progress don't lose track of them at all costs. focus on transports and long range bombers for now. concentrate them in vs units. you will get pocketed. make sure an army hq with a high admin is in the pocket and try to allow room for pocketed units to retreat into the pocket keep them in supply and try to delay but don't attempt to get close to them. your goal is to straddle rail lines he will attack straight up them so flank protection and weak center will slow him. make him close up to the position and halt then fall back and do it again. between rail lines have 8 division armies in horizontal lines east to west to prevent him moving parallel to your front. Concentrate your night bombers on his HQ airbases. hammer his recon nonstop to shut his eyes. use fighter bombers and tac air on ground attack to draw out his fighters and engage them during day turns and level bombers to hit airfields at night after the fighters are used up. blocking forces are only useful along rail lines using terrain.
Hermann
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:57 am
Contact:

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Hermann »

supply drops go to the army hq in the pocket it will distribute them. key is make a plan and stay it don't ever react to hardluck he will eat you.
User avatar
Dinglir
Posts: 620
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 5:35 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Dinglir »

ORIGINAL: Hermann
supply drops go to the army hq in the pocket it will distribute them

I thought this was changed in a recent patch?

As I understand, supply drops to an HQ will go directly to itself and not to fuel and supply dumps that may be distributed.

Has this been changed again?
To be is to do -- Socrates
To do is to be -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Do be do be do -- Frank Sinatra
Hermann
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:57 am
Contact:

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Hermann »

nothing in the manual units draw supply from hq dumps if theres supply in the dump and the units attached it will draw supply
aldiladeisogni1
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 6:29 am

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by aldiladeisogni1 »


A very good first turn for german.
vonik
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:12 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by vonik »

Very good first turn .
The Germans (almost) succeeded to create 3 (!) concentrical encirclement rings in the South what is quite rare .
If he could really close the third circle, your whole Southern Front in Ukraine would evaporate in 2 turns :)
MarauderPL
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 4:50 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by MarauderPL »

The circles dont need to be completed, the important part is cutting the railroads. The little Soviet legs and tracks cant outrun the mighty Panzer III's and all (or most) of the units will be gobbled up next turn.
Stelteck
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:07 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Stelteck »

So, Pelton told about me that i was a runner type general. And in this game i ran a lot at start.

While my frontier army was destroyed by my opponent opening, i ran fast to defensive position, where i had time to dig some fortification with some of my early renforcements.

It was not very interesting to report (The ennemy advance with little resistance and cleared the pockets) so i immediatly jump to turn 4.

Turn 4 : 10 July 1941.

My complete army at the time :
(I appointed Joukov to Stavka, mostly hoping that it's political 9 will save me some admin point cost when assigning others commanders).

Image

Situation in the south (Not my priority currently) :

The ennemy is not very fast here, it looks like it is not its priority either.

Image

But in the north, it is something else :

I spent a lot of admin points and railroad capacity to create a strong NW front able to protect the side of Leningrad, but it is look like my ennemy is not really interested by Leningrad currently, but advance in the center.

This unwilliness to cooperate is quite frustrating. I'am quite confuse. I'am thinking also that it shall be difficult to manage railroad ressuply with only one fast axe of progression.

Image



Brakes are for cowards !!
User avatar
STEF78
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Versailles, France

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by STEF78 »

Hardluckyetagain is a very good player. I lost to him in 12 turns.

He went through VK to Moscow and is a master of logistics. You will face HQBU turn after turn.

Good luck.
GHC 9-0-3
SHC 10-0-4
User avatar
sillyflower
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Back in Blighty

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by sillyflower »

ORIGINAL: Hermann

nothing in the manual units draw supply from hq dumps if theres supply in the dump and the units attached it will draw supply

Updated manual is out of date. Was in a recent patch change
web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?
Stelteck
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:07 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Stelteck »

Turn 5 : 17 July 1941

The ennemy offensive began in front of moscow !!! It is always a surprise how easy a front line is peirce nowadays. Yet the ennemy did not manage to fully encercle my troops, and also in the right of the yellow bar, the supply situation of panzers are "yellow". They are quite far from the railroad.

The ennemy advance was so quite that i had doubts of their capacity to operate with some efficiency here.

Image

So i decided to counter attack, launching troops inside ennemy lines, and successfully put some zone of control in ennemy supply lines.

Image
Brakes are for cowards !!
Stelteck
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:07 pm

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by Stelteck »

Turn 6 : 24 July 1941

My offensive..... Was a very bad move !!!
I really underestimated the capability of panzers to operate so far from railroad, and also underestimated the number of panzer groups in the Area. (At least 3, maybe 3.5).
The ennemy launched some reserves and encercled all my best troops here. And still found some spare panzer to attack and crush my line of defense west, which was not so bad.
I have around 4 Armies isolated and doomed, and a very bad strategic situation.

Image

On the other hand, in the south, nothing happened. Me and my opponent both removed a lots of troops from this area to help the battle in the center.

Image

Stavka meeting is in progress for the future of the operations. A new strategy is needed.
Brakes are for cowards !!
timmyab
Posts: 2046
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:48 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

RE: A small WW2: AAR Stelteck (USSR) Vs HardLuckYetAgain(Not USSR): (No HardLuckYetAgain please)

Post by timmyab »

Yikes! Situation critical, possibly terminal.

Being rolled by a strong Axis player is no disgrace these days though. Soviet play has to be extremely precise to avoid a runaway. In fact I'm not yet convinced it's possible to stop the very best Axis players from gaining a significant advantage in 1941.

This game shows why it's important not to overcommit to Leningrad before knowing where the pz groups are headed. VL is an important city and should have a garrison even on turn one (a sec unit will do). Build and maintain an adequate force there until PG4 is definitely commited to Leningrad.
I believe Moscow should always be top priority. Leningrad is expendable, Moscow isn't imo.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”