North Korea Current Situation

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
User avatar
Nemesis30
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 6:21 pm

North Korea Current Situation

Post by Nemesis30 »

Are there any Scenarios or Mods covering the current situation with North Korea? Something like an updated Live - Korean Missile Crisis?

Thanks
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12862
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: North Korea Current Situation

Post by Sardaukar »

Chains of War DLC...
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Nemesis30
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 6:21 pm

RE: North Korea Current Situation

Post by Nemesis30 »

Thanks
User avatar
kevinkins
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:54 am

RE: North Korea Current Situation

Post by kevinkins »

I have a Community scenario coming. Working on my alpha testing double checking. Please check the Scenario and Mod forum next week. I understand your interest. Events are flying so fast it has been hard to keep up.

Kevin

“The study of history lies at the foundation of all sound military conclusions and practice.”
Alfred Thayer Mahan
Tailhook
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:31 am

RE: North Korea Current Situation

Post by Tailhook »

ORIGINAL: Nemesis30

Are there any Scenarios or Mods covering the current situation with North Korea? Something like an updated Live - Korean Missile Crisis?

Thanks
Take the Korean Missile Crisis scenario and take out the Carrier group (It's pierside right now) and the Russians (unlikely to intervene).
DrRansom
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:52 pm

RE: North Korea Current Situation

Post by DrRansom »

A scenario detailing the early war SCUD / ICBM hunt, in a fast breaking crisis, would be quite useful to understand the dynamics of a North Korean missile strike.
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

RE: North Korea Current Situation

Post by SeaQueen »

That wouldn't be early war. Any air campaign is going to begin with taking out their IADS. Until they've knocked that down to an acceptable level, nobody is hunting for anything as difficult to find as SSM TELs.

ORIGINAL: DrRansom

A scenario detailing the early war SCUD / ICBM hunt, in a fast breaking crisis, would be quite useful to understand the dynamics of a North Korean missile strike.
User avatar
kevinkins
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:54 am

RE: North Korea Current Situation

Post by kevinkins »

We have all read about North Korea's potential apocalyptic artillery strike on the South. I think it would be silly to try to simulate that on the ground unit-by-unit but not silly to do so via random events that present the player with a decision tree where risk and rewards are incrementally elevated. So without having individual North Korean artillery to knock out, the US side "suppresses" the enemy arty by being in a specific area with a certain strike package. So instead of NK gaining 100 points an hour as they hit Seoul they only gain 10, for example. Abstracted artillery and counter strikes within an operation context.

Kevin
“The study of history lies at the foundation of all sound military conclusions and practice.”
Alfred Thayer Mahan
User avatar
Gunner98
Posts: 6001
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:49 am
Location: The Great White North!
Contact:

RE: North Korea Current Situation

Post by Gunner98 »

That's an interesting idea Kevin.

The reason I didn't include the A-10s or MLRS in KMC was I assumed they would be involved in a counter battery campaign to cover Seoul. You may be able to achieve better results by using a combination of Special actions and your idea of point reduction.

i.e. Special action - Commit 12x A-10 to counter artillery missions and gain XX points and Lua them away. You could have several of these so the player has some real choice in his strike packages. If he really wants to keep the A-10's he could commit say 16x F-16 or 50x TLAMs for the same effect (maybe not the TLAMS)

Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”