Just wondering ...

The sequel of the legendary wargame with a complete graphics and interface overhaul, major new gameplay and design features such as full naval combat modelling, improved supply handling, numerous increases to scenario parameters to better support large scenarios, and integrated PBEM++.
Post Reply
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

Just wondering ...

Post by nukkxx5058 »

Is there at least one guy here playing with 3D map and figurines ?
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
gwgardner
Posts: 7278
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:23 pm

RE: Just wondering ...

Post by gwgardner »

Is 3d a scenario specific feature? I see no option for turning on 3d.

[later] sorry, I see it now in map options.

Tamas
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Just wondering ...

Post by Tamas »

Its a legacy feature we have not removed, but we do not endorse either.
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

RE: Just wondering ...

Post by nukkxx5058 »

OK, I understand :-) Thanks for this precision.
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
User avatar
larryfulkerson
Posts: 42791
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:06 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ,usa,sol, milkyway
Contact:

RE: Just wondering ...

Post by larryfulkerson »

ORIGINAL: nukkxx

OK, I understand :-) Thanks for this precision.
Here's how you get to the 3D view.

Image
Attachments
temp.jpg
temp.jpg (206.26 KiB) Viewed 246 times
Russia’s 41st Army COLLAPSED in Pokrovsk — 25,000 Soldiers KILLED After a RIDICULOUS Russian Assault
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_CtW3GqPQg
mccartyg
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:43 pm

RE: Just wondering ...

Post by mccartyg »

When were 3d map/icons implemented? Seems like Talonsoft tried to merge their products. 3d works well for the campaign series but is really terrible for the large scale of TOAW. Waste of data really.
DanNeely
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:05 am

RE: Just wondering ...

Post by DanNeely »

They were in ACOW, not sure if older versions, and widely derided at the time.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man ... weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not [it] an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
mccartyg
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:43 pm

RE: Just wondering ...

Post by mccartyg »

Reading up on it, according to mobygames, isometric was optionable in TOAW1. The sprites were probably just copied between campaign series and TOAW. They look nice but operationally at the interface there is so much that is disguised by the sprites and terrain features using isometric.
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

RE: Just wondering ...

Post by nukkxx5058 »

I always thought that developing 3D effects was a loss of time and energy as far as wargames are concerned. Particlularly hex based wargames. But even for games like EU4 or CK2. I definitely don't see the point. A nice 2D map looks much better.
However I definitely understand the legacy reason above mentioned ...
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
Post Reply

Return to “The Operational Art of War IV”