BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

Ok...

This is not going to be the most brilliant AAR that has ever been written, not by a long shot. I do not have the time to make it so. But I will need all the help I can get, as I will be playing against John in his own mod, so any and all comments are more than welcome. In fact, I plead that you all comment and ask questions fairly often :)

I have definitely bitten more than I can chew, but I will play Between the Storms against John 3rd. He will play the Empire of the Rising Sun, and I will play the Allies. We are in the very initial stages of negotiating house rules, etc., so this will not start for a while, but I had a bit of time free and decided to at least start this. I do not know if we will play with the Yamato-class BBs or with the Owari-class BBs. I have let John choose. More surprise for the allies.

Also, many changes have come with the latest versions of BTS/BTSL. These are a few:

- IJA changeover to triangle Infantry divisions fully occurs allowing for three more ID to be created (1 in China, 1 in Manchuria, and 1 for Southern Army). This change weakens nine infantry divisions who lose their fourth regiment, but creates three more divisions, and the one thaat starts under Southern Army command might be troublesome from the start.
- The Lexington fighter squadron start with F4F-3a instead of Buffalo. To compensate, VMF-211 (Wake and Midway) lose their F4F-3a and revert to Buffalo. That means CAP over Wake and Midway is weaker, but the Lady Lex is better protected.
- A number of Dutch LCUs can now be bought out. The total is more than 25 at-start LCUs, although many of them are components of larger units.
- The 13th USA Arm Div that comes into play at the end of '42 can be bought out with PPs and sent into harm's way.
- The Chinese receive 350 infantry squads a month now.
- 300 Political Points (now 600 total) added to Allied starting number to allow more first-turn flexibility. Coupled with the increased PPs per turn, this makes for faster reinforcements.

The above are added to the Alt Hist that can be seen in the website. For those that do not know the mod, these are a few of the changes to the Allied OOB:

- New air units.
- Addition of training squadrons on mainland USA to allow for an American pilot training program.
- Enhanced aircraft production numbers.
- Additional Allied FP groups.
- New ground units.
- Additional New Zealand and Australian ships.
- A French Squadron at Tahiti.
- The CL Eendract for the DEI.
- A stronger Force Z.
- A CLAA conversion for the Omaha-CL class.
- An additional pair of USN CVLs.
- Optional conversion of the Kittyhawk Class AKV and Tangier Class AV into CVEs.

The Hepburn Board's recommendation to augmenting and expanding many Pacific Bases is heeded, and work is sped up at Wake, Midway, the Aleutians, and in the South Pacific. While work has just begun in many ways, these advances pose a tougher problem for Japan if she moves east or southeast.

- The British Asiatic Fleet is reinforced with a CA and 4 modern DDs
- The development of Cebu as an alternate anchorage has been started.
- The Scouting Force, commanded by Vc-Adm Wilson, is sent south to protect the ships helping to develop Pago Pago into a forward operating base.
- The Royal Navy moves Valiant and Queen Elizabeth from Home Fleet to Ceylon.
- HMS Renown reinforces Force Z.
- HMS Indomitable and her escorts also start at Ceylon.
- The 48th Gurkha Brigade is rushed into Singapore along with supplies and two dozen crated Hurricane Fighters. Unfortunately the other two brigades of the 17th Indian Division start in Karachi and Rangoon.

Although I mainly play the Japanese side, I have a 2-day per turn BTSL game running with Falken in which we are almost at the end of April '42, with me playing the Allies too. I have found that the Allies get much more stuff than I am comfortable facing as the Japanese, and have learned a lot. Let's see if that experience helps me with this game.

Will post more when John and I agree on House Rules.
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by ny59giants »

Outside of John, I probably know these mods best since I've been involved with them over the years in development and changes.

Of course I want you to defeat John as quickly, but with as much pain as possible.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

ROFL!!!!

I wish I had such optimism! A question... besides what I posted above, what could I be missing? I am starting my pre-game notebook notes: IJN forces, IJA forces, then Allied forces. The IJN I know decently well. The new Japanese LCUs I need to locate. Then I need to re-check the Allied side of things, especially startup locations.
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
Canoerebel
Posts: 21099
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Contact:

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Canoerebel »

John is a superb opponent that makes for a great gaming ride. He's experienced and ridiculously aggressive. That means you've just stepped into the saddle on a bronco that likes bucking, twisting and turning. Settle in carefully and enjoy the ride. You'll have fun, you'll take some lumps, and you'll find ways to counter him when the times are right.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

I feel more like I am in the cockpit of an F-22... and alll the expierience I've had is flying a Cessna... once! ;p
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
DOCUP
Posts: 3133
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:38 pm

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by DOCUP »

This makes me happy. I hope you keep your other game updated as much as you can. Use his aggression against him.
User avatar
apbarog
Posts: 3821
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 6:54 am

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by apbarog »

Good luck Kitakami. The war is a 15 round fight. Let him come out swinging. Defend for awhile, counter punch when you can. Wear him down, and then finish him off. And have fun.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by witpqs »

Best of luck! I follow this side, and since I know only a smattering of things (which you just covered already) about the mod I will be more in the dark than you are.

Be tough on house rules. I think the 4EB limitations that many players agree to (Dan/CanoeRebel and perhaps others of John's opponents, for example) are total nonsense. IMO the game engine has been improved enough they are not needed. With both land and shipboard flak improvements 4EB get attrited fast if used too low except against soft targets. And soft targets are... soft targets.

That is my first and possibly most important piece of advice.

Question for you and Michael. Those ships like the BB's which, in the list above, start at Colombo: do they still withdraw? With all the increases in IJN and some in Allied naval power I am wondering how withdrawals figure into things.
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

@witpqs: The Valiant withdraws in 427 days, the Queen Elizabeth does not withdraw. The Indomitable withdraws in 591 days. All three are present for the critical year of 1942.

As for House Rules, we will see what we agree on. Communications in that regard have but started.
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by BillBrown »

I agree with witpqs, be hard on the house rules. I am one that thinks there are no house rules needed. But I also think I am in the minority on that.
I would not ever agree to any restrictions on Strategic bombing at all and none on 4 engine bombers.
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

There are a few house rules I think make the game a bit more historical. I will let you know when the two of us finally agree on something :)
Tenno Heika Banzai!
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by jwolf »

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

There are a few house rules I think make the game a bit more historical. I will let you know when the two of us finally agree on something :)

I always find these reports about house rules ironically amusing. I imagine top level negotiators for each nation haggling over conditions for the horrible war they are about to fight as soon as the treaty is signed.
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2623
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Good luck! I look forward to reading this AAR. I would also caution against too many house rules. There are counters and opportunity costs associated with just about every tactic.

Cheers,
CC
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

The house rule set will probably be finished today, as I just sent a few tweaks to John. Interestingly, so you don't start ranting when you see them, the most restrictive ones were my suggestions, not John's. He only insisted on one, the last one. You will see soon.

On an entirely different topic, I have started to take a look at the OOB of both sides. They are very different from everything I have played up to this point, the BtS Lite Game I have running with Falken included. I am taking notes, and will post them here when I am finished.

Just a couple more days before turn one officially begins, I think.
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20708
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

The house rule set will probably be finished today, as I just sent a few tweaks to John. Interestingly, so you don't start ranting when you see them, the most restrictive ones were my suggestions, not John's. He only insisted on one, the last one. You will see soon.

On an entirely different topic, I have started to take a look at the OOB of both sides. They are very different from everything I have played up to this point, the BtS Lite Game I have running with Falken included. I am taking notes, and will post them here when I am finished.

Just a couple more days before turn one officially begins, I think.
If this mod is the one with CLVs, you should know that they are good for raiding and John does love raiding!
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

John is very, very aggressive, yes. I have followed his AARs on and off through the years. I wonder how best to capitalize on that. Use his strength against him.
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

John is very, very aggressive, yes. I have followed his AARs on and off through the years. I wonder how best to capitalize on that. Use his strength against him.


Rope-a-Dope.

Let him raid.

Be ready to counterpunch the raiders.
Hans

User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

Yes... that will have to be it. Let him invade the Aleutians. Let him raid. Then look for the raiders with fleet carriers where Kido Butai is not. Good plan...
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
BillBrown
Posts: 2335
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 3:55 am

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by BillBrown »

Any word on the HRs yet? I am most interested in them at this time.
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1324
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: BTS/BTSL against John 3rd: What was Kitakami thinking?!?!?!?

Post by Kitakami »

I am waiting for John to reply to my last email on that regard. If there is any objection from his part, it will come from me suggesting one particular rule, and then retracting it partially. My mind has not been as clear as I would wish in the last few weeks.

I will post the list here as soon as it is set in stone, but I will say that the last set did not include any strategic bombing curtailments.
Tenno Heika Banzai!
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”