Question about sps-49 radar

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
AceOfSpadeszzzzzz
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:06 am

Question about sps-49 radar

Post by AceOfSpadeszzzzzz »

So I found out that sps-49 radar is surprisingly good at detecting stealth fighters, even better than modern radar systems like AMDR or JY-26(Detection range against f-22:65nm for jy-26 45 nm for amdr and 70nm for sps-49), what's the reason?[&:]
Attachments
sps49test.zip
(13.39 KiB) Downloaded 15 times
User avatar
Sharana
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:58 pm

RE: Question about sps-49 radar

Post by Sharana »

Sounds about right. The reason is the wavelength.
Image
Bert Blitzkrieg
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:40 am

RE: Question about sps-49 radar

Post by Bert Blitzkrieg »

If you want some more info on radar: http://www.radartutorial.eu/index.en.html
AceOfSpadeszzzzzz
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:06 am

RE: Question about sps-49 radar

Post by AceOfSpadeszzzzzz »

I do have heard that radars with low frequency can be very effective against stealth fighters, but still it's a little hard to believe that such an outdated radar can be this useful... JY-26 is also a low frequency radar built to detect stealth fighters and is more modernized(early 2000s UHF/VHF AESA), but apparently it's not as powerful as this one...
User avatar
Sharana
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:58 pm

RE: Question about sps-49 radar

Post by Sharana »

ORIGINAL: AceOfSpadeszzzzzz

I do have heard that radars with low frequency can be very effective against stealth fighters, but still it's a little hard to believe that such an outdated radar can be this useful... JY-26 is also a low frequency radar built to detect stealth fighters and is more modernized(early 2000s UHF/VHF AESA), but apparently it's not as powerful as this one...

Actually the old radars are more effective at detecting those relatively slow RCS targets. But they are obsolete and hard to maintain and tend to interfere with communications freqs (such as GSM and other nearby bands). They are easy to jam, they are 2D and very inaccurate - can tell there is something out there, can't even give you height as sps-49 2D. Hypersonic targets, ballistic missiles and so on are no go for such radars.

The JY-26 you mentioned on the other hand is new, build with AESA technology, it's 3D and also really hard to jam. It's way more accurate at actually tracking the targets and won't have problems with hypersonic targets. That makes it a lot better then SPS-49 as it's not enough to just detect something out there and the difference isn't that big without even counting the other points that are also very important and shouldn't be skipped when comparing radars.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”