Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Armored Brigade is a real-time tactical wargame, focusing on realism and playability
Post Reply
EchoOne
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:10 pm

Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by EchoOne »

Only lost one Leopard 2A1 MBT

Image
Attachments
ArmoredBrigade2.jpg
ArmoredBrigade2.jpg (143.9 KiB) Viewed 444 times
EchoOne
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:10 pm

RE: Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by EchoOne »

Approximately 53 minutes to reach both objective and defend the objective. The element of surprise depends solely on the situation at hand of FRG's armored platoon(s) of Leopard 2A1s and Marders.
User avatar
22sec
Posts: 1238
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 4:09 pm
Location: Jackson, MS
Contact:

RE: Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by 22sec »

I wondered when designing if maybe the Germans might have a platoon too many of Leopard 2’s.
Flashpoint Campaigns Contributor
https://twitter.com/22sec2
EchoOne
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:10 pm

RE: Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by EchoOne »

Well, rest of the formation(s) were pretty spread out, but I managed to have two platoons of Leopard 2A1, along with a couple of mechanized platoon with Marders, to reach the objective first before rest of other formations reach the objective or linking up with them at the objective. Rest of other Leopard 2A1 platoon(s) were too far right as they attempted to flanking their left. Its nasty terrain/battlefield, and limited Line of Sight.
EchoOne
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:10 pm

RE: Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by EchoOne »

Luckily, we took four of their recon units in the first 30 minutes. Basically, they don't know what hit them as they didn't have an opportunity to relay their encounter with Leopard 2A1 to their headquarter.
EchoOne
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:10 pm

RE: Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by EchoOne »

Also, from area to area was slowly scouted by our recon unit and cleared two platoons of Leopard 2A1 to move or advance toward the objective. Time-consuming, it takes a lot of time to clear and scout the area only with the two-wheeled recon unit.
User avatar
Veitikka
Posts: 1511
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:11 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

RE: Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by Veitikka »

This scenario was a last minute addition. It's night, and there's about an equal number of NATO and Soviet tanks. The NATO side has thermal imaging systems, the Soviets don't have. A serious imbalance indeed...
Know thyself!
EchoOne
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:10 pm

RE: Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by EchoOne »

The reason, why I lost only one Leopard 2A1, was lost because one of their infantry platoons were well hidden in the wooded area, and suddenly stepped out from the wood as the leading Leopard 2A1 was rolling by (stand right behind of the leading Leopard 2A1) and kill the leading Leopard 2A1 as rest of Leopard 2A1 pulverized them.

By the way, I also own FCRS (LittleDogmaOne) and can see it have a lot of room for future improvements/additional. This is a keeper

noooooo
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:03 pm

RE: Midnight surprise (FRG vs USSR)

Post by noooooo »

ORIGINAL: Veitikka

This scenario was a last minute addition. It's night, and there's about an equal number of NATO and Soviet tanks. The NATO side has thermal imaging systems, the Soviets don't have. A serious imbalance indeed...

I just compared the night vision and FRG has 2500 nightvision and USSR has........ 700. [X(]
Post Reply

Return to “Armored Brigade”