OT: New tanker war?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

OT: New tanker war?

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

British tanker seized by Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49053383

that was an obvious move, I can't understand how they went in without some form of escort
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

British tanker seized by Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49053383

that was an obvious move, I can't understand how they went in without some form of escort


Because they wanted the piracy? Escort would have prevented seizure, thus it's pretty safe to say they wanted their ship grabbed so they could bomb the crap out of Iran.

The MIC's moves are always designed to give the impression that they are the victim.
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
Timotheus
Posts: 495
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 11:13 am

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by Timotheus »

Were the Iranians speaking murican?
NEWBIE GUIDE Distant Worlds Universe
http://tinyurl.com/k3frrle

War in the Pacific Poradnik po Polsku
http://tinyurl.com/nxd4cesh

INSTALL WITPAE on modern PC
https://tinyurl.com/l5kr6rl
User avatar
FlyByKnight
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:00 pm
Location: West Coast

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by FlyByKnight »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

British tanker seized by Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49053383

that was an obvious move, I can't understand how they went in without some form of escort


Because they wanted the piracy? Escort would have prevented seizure, thus it's pretty safe to say they wanted their ship grabbed so they could bomb the crap out of Iran.

The MIC's moves are always designed to give the impression that they are the victim.
The boomers are at it again. Bad news bro, all the young and hip wannabee 'defense analysts' were cawing the same thing back when the first tanker was attacked. The "lol I can see what's really going on" train left long ago. How do they even get away with this when so many keyboard commandos are loudly declaring that they know a plot when they see it?
And if the BRITISH government thinks letting some tankers get seized as a pretense for war is a good way to distract from the issues Zombie May's government presides over at home they'll soon be disappointed. Crazy Corbyn isn't going to miss the opportunity it'll provide, I'm sure.
ORIGINAL: Big B

The obvious question is - "Will each shell do at least 0ne Million Dollars worth of damage?" If not, someone needs to look at this again and rethink it.
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: FlyByKnight

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

British tanker seized by Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49053383

that was an obvious move, I can't understand how they went in without some form of escort


Because they wanted the piracy? Escort would have prevented seizure, thus it's pretty safe to say they wanted their ship grabbed so they could bomb the crap out of Iran.

The MIC's moves are always designed to give the impression that they are the victim.
The boomers are at it again. Bad news bro, all the young and hip wannabee 'defense analysts' were cawing the same thing back when the first tanker was attacked. The "lol I can see what's really going on" train left long ago. How do they even get away with this when so many keyboard commandos are loudly declaring that they know a plot when they see it?
And if the BRITISH government thinks letting some tankers get seized as a pretense for war is a good way to distract from the issues Zombie May's government presides over at home they'll soon be disappointed. Crazy Corbyn isn't going to miss the opportunity it'll provide, I'm sure.
Why do you post this stuff? You know the forum rules. [&:]
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5556
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by Yaab »

Nothing to see here, folks. You can always ship oil/fuel in xAKs.
User avatar
Edward75
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:24 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by Edward75 »

I worked in Steta Bulk Company 10 years ago. Nice Shipping company!
Fishbed
Posts: 1827
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:52 am
Location: Henderson Field, Guadalcanal

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by Fishbed »

Obviously these IRG speedboats seem way more efficient at their jobs than any PT-boat you might get in AE. I request some fixin'!
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20651
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

British tanker seized by Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49053383

that was an obvious move, I can't understand how they went in without some form of escort
I saw a retired US Admiral talk about patrolling the strait. The coast of Iran along the strait extends for 1000 miles and there are hundreds of tankers (and presumably some cargo ships) plying the waters. Western nations have groups of patrolling vessels here and there but nowhere near enough to cover the whole distance or provide individual escort to the ships of their own nations.

Canada participates in this force but most of our participation is aimed at arms smuggling, especially ships from North Korea which have been identified as probable violators. Between Iran and all the non-state groups fighting over Iraq and Syria the arms trade is very lucrative in the region so lots of dealers will try to break embargos. Often, they succeed ... [:(]
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42130
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

British tanker seized by Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49053383

that was an obvious move, I can't understand how they went in without some form of escort
I saw a retired US Admiral talk about patrolling the strait. The coast of Iran along the strait extends for 1000 miles and there are hundreds of tankers (and presumably some cargo ships) plying the waters. Western nations have groups of patrolling vessels here and there but nowhere near enough to cover the whole distance or provide individual escort to the ships of their own nations.

Canada participates in this force but most of our participation is aimed at arms smuggling, especially ships from North Korea which have been identified as probable violators. Between Iran and all the non-state groups fighting over Iraq and Syria the arms trade is very lucrative in the region so lots of dealers will try to break embargos. Often, they succeed ... [:(]
warspite1

Now why do you have go spoiling a good rant by introducing a sensible post into the thread.... honestly, some people [;)]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20651
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: OT: New tanker war?

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

British tanker seized by Iran

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49053383

that was an obvious move, I can't understand how they went in without some form of escort
I saw a retired US Admiral talk about patrolling the strait. The coast of Iran along the strait extends for 1000 miles and there are hundreds of tankers (and presumably some cargo ships) plying the waters. Western nations have groups of patrolling vessels here and there but nowhere near enough to cover the whole distance or provide individual escort to the ships of their own nations.

Canada participates in this force but most of our participation is aimed at arms smuggling, especially ships from North Korea which have been identified as probable violators. Between Iran and all the non-state groups fighting over Iraq and Syria the arms trade is very lucrative in the region so lots of dealers will try to break embargos. Often, they succeed ... [:(]
warspite1

Now why do you have go spoiling a good rant by introducing a sensible post into the thread.... honestly, some people [;)]
That's me - always upsetting the balance of THE FORCE!

Image
Attachments
ForShame.gif
ForShame.gif (333.96 KiB) Viewed 652 times
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”