Partisan Nomenclature

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

Post Reply
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2294
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

Partisan Nomenclature

Post by 56ajax »

I am sure I have asked this before...

Why are Partisans named #3 Partisan Bn ie the #. 3 or 4 units do not have the #

It has nothing to do with Ready Status as the CR report using filter of Ready returns units with the #.

And why is Partisan Fatigue always so high?
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2294
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by 56ajax »

Mean while back at the ranch, or collective farm....

According to the manual Partisan units are Combat Active or Inactive, and the # denotes combat Inactive. This is determined by a combination of Morale, Supplies and Number of Partisans. (Doesn't say what combo)

Now in my game there are 48 partisan units and only 4 are Combat Active ie 44 have the #. I cannot fathom why a unit with Morale of 50, 483 partisans (92%TOE) and supply at 250% would not be set to active.

If you use the CR, Combat Ready/Unready filter you get 23/25 units respectively which seems much more realistic.

I smell redundant code...
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2294
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by 56ajax »

Perhaps I should have labelled this thread 'An update by 3by2 Games'

Anyway in my current beta test game 22 partisan units have been created and only 1 doesn't have #.

I wouldn't hang my hat on this but this unit is the only one that has been created directly from a city ie Minsk.
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2294
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by 56ajax »

Just an update for all those not interested.

I now have 63 partisan battalions, 22 combat ready and only 3 combat active (whatever that means). And last turn they did.....nothing.....
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
DaubryMeadows
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:42 pm

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by DaubryMeadows »

I have been looking at my partisans too and it is also a mystery to me. Would be interested to find out what exactly it takes for a partisan to at least die roll for a blown rail.
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2294
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by 56ajax »

I have a WiTE memory of like the chance that a partisan unit will perform combat is only 10% and as I only have 4 combat active something should happen once every 3 turns or so
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
Denniss
Posts: 9276
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Hannover (region)

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by Denniss »

do you properly supply then with air-dropped supplies/men?
WitE dev team - (aircraft data)
WitE 1.08+ dev team (data/scenario maintainer)
WitW dev team (aircraft data, partial data/scenario maintainer)
WitE2 dev team (aircraft data)
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2294
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by 56ajax »

ORIGINAL: Denniss

do you properly supply then with air-dropped supplies/men?
No I let the system do that using IL4s on night missions from Very Very Special Airbases

[:D]

For a while I manually supplied partisans so that every unit had supplies > 100% but I suspect all this did was alert my opponent to their possible location as he started to blunder into them, without suffering a casaulty...not one...
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
User avatar
Telemecus
Posts: 4689
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:32 pm
Contact:

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by Telemecus »

If you let the AI do it during logistics then it will not show your opponent where they were supplied. If you do it manually during your turn your opponent will indeed have a battle icon on their map when they open it showing exactly where the partisans were supplied - and by definition exactly where they are!!!!
Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2294
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

RE: Partisan Nomenclature

Post by 56ajax »

Its not whether the AI does it but rather if the manual resupply is flown at night.

Any way the purpose of the manual resupply was to ensure that the partisans had optimum conditions (ie 100% supplies) for combat. I suspect I was supplying vodka...
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”