Ju 88 A-5

Post bug reports and request technical assistance here.

Moderators: warshipbuilder, simovitch

Post Reply
User avatar
BigDuke66
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Terra

Ju 88 A-5

Post by BigDuke66 »

Hi
please someone fix the MG on it, MG 17 were afaik never used as defensive armament as they were intended as forward-firing offensive armament in fighters and not as flexible-mounted defensive armamanet.
These must all be MG 15, even both of the front MG are afaik MG 15 although one was not flexible mounted.
User avatar
warshipbuilder
Posts: 3041
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:52 pm
Location: C-eh-n-eh-d-eh

RE: Ju 88 A-5

Post by warshipbuilder »

As far as the DB is concerned both weapons are identical. There is no difference in their capabilities. Mind you I am a great believer in historical accuracy, so the switch can be made.
warshipbuilder

Any ship can be a minesweeper, once.
ED/BTR Ressurection Project
https://www.bombercommandmuseumarchives.ca/
User avatar
BigDuke66
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Terra

RE: Ju 88 A-5

Post by BigDuke66 »

Yes it's good that the performance data isn't different, I guess that is the reason why this error is still around after so many years. But I'm also into historical accuracy and just had to point this out.

Just wonder if there is the chance for a database update instead of delaying this for the next patch, afaik WitP got also some updates, for example AI files & scenario updates, that were done outside the usual patches.
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”