Finnish attack in the winter

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

Post Reply
User avatar
jesperpehrson
Posts: 843
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:48 pm

Finnish attack in the winter

Post by jesperpehrson »

Help us understand why this attack is not +13.

Image
Attachments
Winterattack.jpg
Winterattack.jpg (239.33 KiB) Viewed 189 times
PBEMgames played
- Korea 50-51 MV as communist
- Agonia y Victoria xx as Republican
- Plan Blau OV as Soviet
- The great war xx as Central Powers
- DNO XX as Soviet
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9065
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: Finnish attack in the winter

Post by Centuur »

Just before the die roll for the attack gets rolled, Germany should get the question if the winterized units lead the attack. If you do (and of course you do so), the attack should end up being a +13.
Peter
User avatar
jesperpehrson
Posts: 843
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:48 pm

RE: Finnish attack in the winter

Post by jesperpehrson »

I am quite sure this did not happen as we went ahead with a +3 on the dieroll manually.
And why is it not added as other bonuses?
Confusing!
PBEMgames played
- Korea 50-51 MV as communist
- Agonia y Victoria xx as Republican
- Plan Blau OV as Soviet
- The great war xx as Central Powers
- DNO XX as Soviet
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Finnish attack in the winter

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

Partisans get a +1 to their combat factors in forest (regardless of weather).

So it is 14:2 => +14 with -4 for the weather => +10.

The choice for using the snow units is later in the sequence of play.

===
// ****************************************************************************
// Land combat resolution subphases.
// ****************************************************************************
TLandCombatResSubPhase = (
LCRspLandCombatSelection, // RAC 11.16.5.
LCRspDefSnowUnits, // RAC 8.2.7.
LCRspAttSnowUnits, // RAC 8.2.7.
LCRspChooseCombatType, // RAC 11.16.5 & 11.16.6.
LCRspLandCombatResolution, // RAC 11.16.5 & 11.16.6.
LCRspAssignLosses, // RAC 11.16.5.
LCRspConvertShattered, // RAC 11.16.5.
LCRspHexControl, // RAC 11.11.6 (overruns)
LCRspRetreats, // RAC 11.16.5.
LCRspAdvanceAfterCombat // RAC 11.16.5.

===

If you include snow units in the attack, then it should be +13 (all the Finns are snow units, hence +3).
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
User avatar
jesperpehrson
Posts: 843
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:48 pm

RE: Finnish attack in the winter

Post by jesperpehrson »

What is the reasoning for not including this in the form to begin with? Using an engineer for instance you have to chose while declaring combat.
PBEMgames played
- Korea 50-51 MV as communist
- Agonia y Victoria xx as Republican
- Plan Blau OV as Soviet
- The great war xx as Central Powers
- DNO XX as Soviet
User avatar
palne
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:58 pm

RE: Finnish attack in the winter

Post by palne »

The engineer is a bit tricky because if you use it's ability it effects how losses are assigned.
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Finnish attack in the winter

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: jesperpehrson

What is the reasoning for not including this in the form to begin with? Using an engineer for instance you have to chose while declaring combat.
I do not know.

It was coded this way when I inherited the code from Chris back in 2004.

Perhaps it is this way because both sides get to choose whether to use the benefits of their Snow/Winterized units - which means they would have to take the first loss. None of that applies to defending engineer units.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
User avatar
jesperpehrson
Posts: 843
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:48 pm

RE: Finnish attack in the winter

Post by jesperpehrson »

Is there actually a choice to use the winterized bonus? I did not get any choice. If you want to try it our for yourself I have a save where you can try it.

My suggestion would be to have it show it with the +X-number.
PBEMgames played
- Korea 50-51 MV as communist
- Agonia y Victoria xx as Republican
- Plan Blau OV as Soviet
- The great war xx as Central Powers
- DNO XX as Soviet
User avatar
Joseignacio
Posts: 3010
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:25 am
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: Finnish attack in the winter

Post by Joseignacio »

ORIGINAL: jesperpehrson

Is there actually a choice to use the winterized bonus? I did not get any choice. If you want to try it our for yourself I have a save where you can try it.

My suggestion would be to have it show it with the +X-number.


According to Steve it should, or there is a bug, I understand.


Partisans get a +1 to their combat factors in forest (regardless of weather).

So it is 14:2 => +14 with -4 for the weather => +10.

The choice for using the snow units is later in the sequence of play.

...

If you include snow units in the attack, then it should be +13 (all the Finns are snow units, hence +3).
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”