To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

Post Reply
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42129
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by warspite1 »

Anybody have any strong feelings one way or the other? Pros/cons of either approach?

Thank-you
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
User avatar
jesperpehrson
Posts: 848
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:48 pm

RE: To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by jesperpehrson »

As most answers it depends I guess.
I have given it some thought, here are a random of assortments:

- If you are going for Spain it is a given I would say and it is better to not get Vichy than collapsing it. The US-entry hit for collapsing Vichy and declaring war on Spain and possibly conquering Gibraltar is massive.
- If the Axis are strong in Egypt/Libya/the Med and you plan on making life miserable for CW, not Vichyfying France makes some sense. You can conquer the relevant minor countries as you expand in North Africa.
- It will take some time to mop up the last french defenders possibly if you do not go for Vichy and that can delay the next move somewhat.
- The French fleet is a welcome boon for the allies with no Vichy

I would say go Vichy 9 out of 10 times but if you have a special plan in mind go for the riskier incomplete conquest of France.
PBEMgames played
- Korea 50-51 MV as communist
- Agonia y Victoria xx as Republican
- Plan Blau OV as Soviet
- The great war xx as Central Powers
- DNO XX as Soviet
ssiviour
Posts: 774
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 7:14 pm
Location: Australia

RE: To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by ssiviour »

2 things worth considering

If Vichy is not declared Allies have a tendancy to Surrender France for an Incomplete Conquest, still has a strong US Entry hit

Japan will not have access to French IndoChina, not that Germany may care ...
User avatar
Centuur
Posts: 9077
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:03 pm
Location: Hoorn (NED).

RE: To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by Centuur »

ORIGINAL: ssiviour

2 things worth considering

If Vichy is not declared Allies have a tendancy to Surrender France for an Incomplete Conquest, still has a strong US Entry hit

Japan will not have access to French IndoChina, not that Germany may care ...

If France surrenders, the US entry hit is half that of the conquest of France (or if one declares Vichy).

The fact that French Indo China stays French is minor. Usually, a conquered France hasn't got the build points or units to build up a defense there.
Having the CW not cooperating with France until the CW liberates Paris is a positive one for the Axis, IMHO.
Peter
User avatar
Orm
Posts: 31229
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 7:53 pm
Location: Sweden

RE: To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by Orm »

Declaring Vichy is often the best option, even if going for Spain. Time is always a factor for Axis early on. One alternative is to DOW and enter Spain before declaring Vichy.

So I recommend, as a rule, to keep it simple and declare Vichy. Preferably as soon as possible.

One exception might be if France have let almost their entire Army and Air force be destroyed in the defence of Paris. Then it can be worth to do mopping up operations. But I suggest that if mopping up takes longer than one turn then it is not worth it.

That is, of course, just my humble opinion.
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

A government is a body of people; usually, notably, ungoverned. - Quote from Firefly
brian brian
Posts: 3191
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:39 pm

RE: To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by brian brian »

Best to make this decision - while you do the German set-up. If things don’t work out as expected, one can shift on the fly. But is better to plan this decision in advance as part of a holistic strategy rather than just winging it in 1940 sometime.
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Anybody have any strong feelings one way or the other? Pros/cons of either approach?

Thank-you
Was it that Vichy van in the 1896 French video that got you thinking about this? [8|]
User avatar
warspite1
Posts: 42129
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: England

RE: To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by warspite1 »

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Anybody have any strong feelings one way or the other? Pros/cons of either approach?

Thank-you
Was it that Vichy van in the 1896 French video that got you thinking about this? [8|]
warspite1

No, it was playing the game [&:]
Now Maitland, now's your time!

Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:21 pm

RE: To Vichy or not to Vichy that is the question....

Post by Zorch »

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Anybody have any strong feelings one way or the other? Pros/cons of either approach?

Thank-you
Was it that Vichy van in the 1896 French video that got you thinking about this? [8|]
warspite1

No, it was playing the game [&:]
Vichy was known for its spa water - hence the van in Paris.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Report”