Gltich with friendship pact

[shi4stone]

When targeting a major regime, it said target faction not allow friendship pact. then i went to regime tab to check what faction is in power, it says realpolitiker and i am surprised it does not allow, so i went back to the strategem and now it shows difficult and expect rolls........ and worked. very strange.

[shi4stone]

And to add to that, every time i managed to get friendship pact, it gets canceled by the AI the next turn. Is that due to AI hidden intention even though it says friends?

[Vic]

What version# has your game?

best wishes,
Vic

[shi4stone]

beta 4, but save file was from 1.03

[shi4stone]

a related strategem glitch, propsing peace with major, difficulty says 110, but after roll it says the difficulty is 220....

[Saros]

Of note Vic in MP I have been unable to send Non-agression pacts and the like to human players because of the faction in charge, this seems a bit strange.

[shi4stone]

okay, another strategem wiredness, draft workers, sucess, lower pop happiness, but no increases in workers.

[zgrssd]

ORIGINAL: shi4stone

okay, another strategem wiredness, draft workers, sucess, lower pop happiness, but no increases in workers.

As a general rule, card effects are set when the savegame is created. To see any changes, you need to start a new game!

[Vic]

ORIGINAL: shi4stone

beta 4, but save file was from 1.03

I think a restart is required for this fine-tune to go into effect.

best,
Vic

[Vic]

ORIGINAL: shi4stone

a related strategem glitch, propsing peace with major, difficulty says 110, but after roll it says the difficulty is 220....

Could you send an autosave to vic@vrdesigns.net where i can play this stratagem and see this diff swap in action?

best wishes,
Vic

[Vic]

@Saros,
Will be fixed next open beta. Another nice catch

[shi4stone]

ORIGINAL: Vic

ORIGINAL: shi4stone

a related strategem glitch, propsing peace with major, difficulty says 110, but after roll it says the difficulty is 220....

Could you send an autosave to vic@vrdesigns.net where i can play this stratagem and see this diff swap in action?

best wishes,
Vic

sadly i have since played quite a few turns (thx for the additive game like a time blackhole btw...), and lost track when did this happen. Will let you know if it happens again.

[shi4stone]

started a version 6 beta new game, this time cannot get realpolitker to sign non/aggression pact which says faction not allowing this type. is that correct? or is there a reference list on what type of deal each faction type would accept?

[zgrssd]

ORIGINAL: shi4stone

started a version 6 beta new game, this time cannot get realpolitker to sign non/aggression pact which says faction not allowing this type. is that correct? or is there a reference list on what type of deal each faction type would accept?

We are on beta 8 right now. Hard to say if there was any bug that was fixed in between.

[WCG]

I'm guessing that this has been fixed in the upcoming version, since a search for my problem brought me here. But I'll explain it, just in case:

I'm playing the released version (1.03.00) in my first game. One of my neighbors is a Republican major regime, firmly under Realpolitiker control. We've had a relationship of 100 with these guys for a long time. We have level 3 deals in communication, research, and trade.

But we have level 0 in military. And I can't even try to change that, because when I attempt to use the non-aggression pact stratagem, the game says, "Regime does not have a faction in power that supports such a pact."

That seems odd. If a Realpolitiker faction won't accept non-aggression pacts, who will? [:)] This has been going on for a long time, and it has never changed for me. (That regime has never offered a non-aggression pact to me, either, which seems odd.)

But again, this is very similar to the initial post here, so I imagine it's already been fixed. I just thought I'd better mention it.

[Vic]

ORIGINAL: WCG

I'm guessing that this has been fixed in the upcoming version, since a search for my problem brought me here. But I'll explain it, just in case:

I'm playing the released version (1.03.00) in my first game. One of my neighbors is a Republican major regime, firmly under Realpolitiker control. We've had a relationship of 100 with these guys for a long time. We have level 3 deals in communication, research, and trade.

But we have level 0 in military. And I can't even try to change that, because when I attempt to use the non-aggression pact stratagem, the game says, "Regime does not have a faction in power that supports such a pact."

That seems odd. If a Realpolitiker faction won't accept non-aggression pacts, who will? [:)] This has been going on for a long time, and it has never changed for me. (That regime has never offered a non-aggression pact to me, either, which seems odd.)

But again, this is very similar to the initial post here, so I imagine it's already been fixed. I just thought I'd better mention it.

It has been fixed. But it requires a new game to go into effect. Just to make sure. With which version did you start your game (mouse over #version in dashboard report if you forgot)

[GodwinW]

Not fixed (if 1.04 == 1.03b12 at least), but I guess you realized that now after seeing my post about it. Quite a coincidence this suddenly pops up for everyone.

[WCG]

ORIGINAL: Vic


It has been fixed. But it requires a new game to go into effect. Just to make sure. With which version did you start your game (mouse over #version in dashboard report if you forgot)

Game Build v 1.03
Scenario Build Version v 1.02
Last Game Build used: 103
Scenario Version Number: #21

PS. Great game! I'm loving it. Thanks!

Bill

[Vic]

ORIGINAL: WCG

ORIGINAL: Vic


It has been fixed. But it requires a new game to go into effect. Just to make sure. With which version did you start your game (mouse over #version in dashboard report if you forgot)

Game Build v 1.03
Scenario Build Version v 1.02
Last Game Build used: 103
Scenario Version Number: #21

PS. Great game! I'm loving it. Thanks!

Bill

Thanks.

Major diplomacy should work much better with a new game start with v1.04.

Which you should upgrade to in any case

best wishes,
Vic

[GodwinW]

Oh you have to *start* a new game with it. Ok, that's good news, starting a new game today and then I don't have to go to war with everyone or rush to 50 before they get 25.

I was under the impression I wouldn't have to because you asked me to retry with a save in the other thread, which I did, I don't know if you saw it (fb.asp?m=4845667).