Malta

Fury Games has now signed with Matrix Games, and we are working together on the next Strategic Command. Will use the Slitherine PBEM++ server for asynchronous multi-player.

Moderators: MOD_Strategic_Command_3, Fury Software

Post Reply
canuckgamer
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 3:20 am

Malta

Post by canuckgamer »

Playing my first PBEM game as the Axis. If I bomb Malta does that decrease it's impact on my supply in North Africa? What about bombing the port? I think that having a ship adjacent to the port reduces supply to the garrison.

I've took Alexandria by amphibious assault a few turns ago when my opponent did not garrison it and am adjacent to Cairo. I assume my supply situation will improve if I am able to take Cairo.
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: Malta

Post by Platoonist »

Malta also has a fortified town (Valetta)which will continue to provide some supply to the garrison even with both ports blockaded. When it comes to Malta being a thorn in the side, the only permanent solution is to capture the place. I don't think there is a way to mitigate it.
Image
canuckgamer
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 3:20 am

RE: Malta

Post by canuckgamer »

Okay, I thought bombing might have an effect on how much Malta hinders Axis supply because historically when the Axis did bomb it heavily it helped supply get through to North Africa.
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: Malta

Post by Platoonist »

The manual states that Malta typically has only a 15-20 % chance per turn of reducing the supply values of Axis controlled ports in Libya and Egypt. I'm assuming this to mean that the island is always under some form of siege by Axis naval and air forces in an abstracted manner. But as the Axis player, you don't have any control over when Malta acts as an impediment or not, and by itself it's not enough to completely shut down the island.
Image
Will952
Posts: 176
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2018 3:26 pm

RE: Malta

Post by Will952 »

I'm fairly sure I did read that keeping Malta's supply under 5 reduces the chance of the supply hinderance effect for Axis forces in NA firing. So if you have the resources to keep it under bombardment but not enough to capture it you can do that (although in those circumstances it'd surely be worth it just to commit the necessary troops to take it).
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: Malta

Post by Platoonist »

ORIGINAL: Will952

I'm fairly sure I did read that keeping Malta's supply under 5 reduces the chance of the supply hinderance effect for Axis forces in NA firing. So if you have the resources to keep it under bombardment but not enough to capture it you can do that (although in those circumstances it'd surely be worth it just to commit the necessary troops to take it).

Yes, you are quite correct. I never think to read the patch notes. [X(]

SUPPLY SCRIPT events such as the Malta Supply Reduction event for Axis resources in North Africa, will require #SOURCE_POSITION units to have a strength >= 5 or the event will not fire. Suppression as opposed to outright capture of locations such as Malta will now be possible in order to negate the supply reduction effects.

Of course keeping Malta under continuous blockade means the location of some of your ships are exposed to the Brits and vulnerable to counterattack. But, its a least some means of securing the supply situation in North Africa.

Image
User avatar
Taifun
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:23 pm
Location: Spain

RE: Malta

Post by Taifun »



SUPPLY SCRIPT events such as the Malta Supply Reduction event for Axis resources in North Africa, will require #SOURCE_POSITION units to have a strength >= 5 or the event will not fire. Suppression as opposed to outright capture of locations such as Malta will now be possible in order to negate the supply reduction effects.

That is nice to know! [&o]
La clé est l'état d'esprit
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII War in Europe”