OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by Dili »

User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19202
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by RangerJoe »

When it is not your time, it is not your time.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 14852
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by btd64 »

Unlucky. Or just plain bad luck. I read this story a few years ago. At least the Dutch trawler wasn't torpedoed....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by fcooke »

I haven't read too much about those three cruisers getting whacking but I think at least one was trying to pick up survivors from the first when she got hit. Not sure how many sailors lost it that day but I would guess a fair many as all three ships went down.
CV10
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu May 21, 2020 2:57 pm

RE: OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by CV10 »

If I remember correctly, the British thought the first ship had struck a mine. The other two closed in to take on survivors and were sitting ducks.

I'd say the guy had bad fortune but good luck. Almost 1500 officers and sailors were lost.

There was a sort of similar case involving a stoker named Arthur John Priest.He survived 5 ship sinkings in his career, including Titanic and Britannic.
"Jack, you have debauched my sloth!" Dr. Stephen Maturin
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12731
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by Sardaukar »

There was also a woman who survived both Titanic and Britannic...
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Shilka
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:51 am

RE: OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by Shilka »

I think these armored cruisers were near the end of their life and heading to the scrapper, designed in 1900 or so and with a top speed of 21kt they weren't that useful except maybe in some colonial duties or patrolling at best. And still they carried a complement of over 700 which would've been better utilized in newer ships. Still, it was a massive catastrophe for the Royal Navy and a loss of skilled sailors.

Mine warfare was also much more utilized in WW1 and caused huge pain to the RN. Losing HMS Audacious was another major catastrophe, and it happened in the Irish sea. They adopted a policy of putting any German POWs to the bow compartments, so if they hit a mine they would be the first to go.

Another horrible event is the Battle of Dogger Bank where the German BC squadron included the slower Blücher armored cruiser. It got left behind, the British managed to slow it down, cripple and overtake it. As the rest of Hipper's battle cruisers escaped, Jellicoes BC squadron took their frustration on the Blücher, firing 10s or 100s of rounds of different caliber shells at point blank range on the cruiser. Still there was a few survivors and they produced an account of their experience aboard, which needless to say was a living hell. BC Seydlitz got a rear turret hit, which caused a flash fired and burned out the other rear turret next to it. The magazines were flooded with over 500 tonnes of water yet they managed to keep their speed and escape.
(https://www.amazon.com/Castles-Steel-Br ... B000FBJDG6 good book of all these events if interested).
Denniss
Posts: 9275
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Hannover (region)

RE: OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by Denniss »

The hit to Seydlitz turret was both unlucky and lucky, they learnt from this and modified their turrets to prevent this from happening again. Royal Navy learnt this the hard way at Jutland with 2 BC exploding within 30 minutes and another one 2 hours later.

according to Wiki the old armored cruisers were manned by inexperienced reservists, don't know if the officers were of the same "quality". At least it would explain their actions.
WitE dev team - (aircraft data)
WitE 1.08+ dev team (data/scenario maintainer)
WitW dev team (aircraft data, partial data/scenario maintainer)
WitE2 dev team (aircraft data)
anarchyintheuk
Posts: 3958
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: OT: Lucky or Unlucky?

Post by anarchyintheuk »

Aboukir et al. were unofficially known as the 'live bait squadron'.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”