change victory conditions?

[misterprimus]

Is there a way to change victory conditions of a game?

[BlueTemplar]

Not that I know of, but if you don't like the current ones, you can just ignore them, and set your own in your head / agreed beforehand with your human opponent(s) ?

[zgrssd]

Vic said he is working on the Scenario Editor and Victory conditions should be part of it. Beyond that, it is what BlueTemplar said.

[misterprimus]

ORIGINAL: zgrssd

Vic said he is working on the Scenario Editor and Victory conditions should be part of it. Beyond that, it is what BlueTemplar said.

I like to turtle and am not as aggressive as the major AI and often even though I am far from beaten, I get the you have lost message.

[zgrssd]

ORIGINAL: misterprimus

ORIGINAL: zgrssd

Vic said he is working on the Scenario Editor and Victory conditions should be part of it. Beyond that, it is what BlueTemplar said.

I like to turtle and am not as aggressive as the major AI and often even though I am far from beaten, I get the you have lost message.

The Victory Conditio is having a high percentage of Population or territory and relevantly more then the person in 2nd.

If you never expanded and are the person in 2nd, then they can win.

[eddieballgame]

It will interesting to see what 'Vic' comes up with per implementing more options for victory conditions.
With the plethora of data & statistics this game offers, there are numerous paths to victory one could allow for.
Scoring per military strength/results, research, population, territory, politics, moods, etc, etc, could allow for a variety of game challenges.
This could be in the form of options or, simply, the overall combined factor to determine ones final status.
Using scoring methods to determine a winner as opposed to all out conquering is a tried & true formula for most games & I am looking forward to what the future holds for this great game in this area.

[mroyer]

I was going to respond here, but decided to compose the response in the suggestions sub-forum instead.

-Mark R.