Japanese depth charges

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
Zigurat666
Posts: 380
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:07 pm

Japanese depth charges

Post by Zigurat666 »

I have played this game for a long time and I know that type 95 charges detonate above target in non coastal hexes,and Type 95 MOD 2 are effective in open ocean.
Lately though I have been getting combat reports of using Type 95 MOD-2 detonating above target.
Did I miss something?
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19521
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by RangerJoe »

Yes, the submarines dived deeper than the depth that the depth charges exploded at.

But all depth charges are good for fishing! [:-]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by Platoonist »

The congressman Andrew J. May event hasn't kicked in yet. [:D]
Image
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by btd64 »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Yes, the submarines dived deeper than the depth that the depth charges exploded at.

But all depth charges are good for fishing! [:-]


Dynamite works well for fishing too [:D]....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19521
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: btd64

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Yes, the submarines dived deeper than the depth that the depth charges exploded at.

But all depth charges are good for fishing! [:-]


Dynamite works well for fishing too [:D]....GP

Like I said . . .

Although it should be called a DuPont spinner.

Hand grenades are safer though. A quarter pound of TNT in a nice, easily throwable, hand held package. [:D]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 15137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by btd64 »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: btd64

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Yes, the submarines dived deeper than the depth that the depth charges exploded at.

But all depth charges are good for fishing! [:-]


Dynamite works well for fishing too [:D]....GP

Like I said . . .

Although it should be called a DuPont spinner.

Hand grenades are safer though. A quarter pound of TNT in a nice, easily throwable, hand held package. [:D]

Yes, very true. Definitely easier to use....GP
IntelUltra7 16cores, 32gb ram, NvidiaGeForceRTX 2050
DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
WIS Manual Team Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command" Gen. George S. Patton
WiS Discord channel coming soon....
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11125
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Zigurat666

I have played this game for a long time and I know that type 95 charges detonate above target in non coastal hexes,and Type 95 MOD 2 are effective in open ocean.
Lately though I have been getting combat reports of using Type 95 MOD-2 detonating above target.
Did I miss something?
Late war allied subs cam dive deeper than any DC that the IJ have ...
Pax
AtParmentier
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2019 10:09 am

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by AtParmentier »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

ORIGINAL: Zigurat666

I have played this game for a long time and I know that type 95 charges detonate above target in non coastal hexes,and Type 95 MOD 2 are effective in open ocean.
Lately though I have been getting combat reports of using Type 95 MOD-2 detonating above target.
Did I miss something?
Late war allied subs cam dive deeper than any DC that the IJ have ...
In game or real life?

Unless it's a user made scenario, no sub has a durability highter than 36 (360feet depth), depending on the version of the vanilla scenarios the type 95-2 has a max depth of 295 or 275 (patch 7). The type two has a depth of 476 or 375 (patch 07).
Apart from two Dutch classes (O19 and O21) no Allied submarine has a durability higher than 31.


User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

ORIGINAL: Zigurat666

I have played this game for a long time and I know that type 95 charges detonate above target in non coastal hexes,and Type 95 MOD 2 are effective in open ocean.
Lately though I have been getting combat reports of using Type 95 MOD-2 detonating above target.
Did I miss something?
Late war allied subs cam dive deeper than any DC that the IJ have ...

Not in Babes I guess, there's no sub that has been going deeper than a Type 2 DC could go too and that's in 10/44.
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by fcooke »

couldn't a Balao safely go to 400' or so?
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20690
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by BBfanboy »

ORIGINAL: fcooke

couldn't a Balao safely go to 400' or so?
One US sub went over 600' deep. Tang? She radioed in the info so that other subs would know they could go deeper than 300' during evasion.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by fcooke »

Tang was an interesting boat (one of my favorites, likely my favorite). To get taken out by your own fish (circular run) was cruddy but I think 6-8 guys made it into the water. But the Japanese sailors who had just witnessed Tang tear apart their convoy were not kind to the survivors. The skipper, Dick O'Kane, was one of those survivors. Sadly even though it was shallow water the rest of the crew never got out. O'Kane wrote a book later about the (I think) 5 war patrols she did. O'Kane had come from either the Harder or Wahoo - cannot remember which, but I believe Tang ended up with the best record on number of ships sunk (not tonnage).

In any case he wrote 'Clear the Bridge' which I found interesting.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19521
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by RangerJoe »

I think that he came from the Wahoo with Mush Morton.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by fcooke »

I looked it up RJ, you are correct. Sad that the Tang, Wahoo and Harder were all lost (as well as the other 49) as they were hard charging boats.
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: Japanese depth charges

Post by Shellshock »

One particular improvement with the Balao class boats the addition of a new slow, heavy-duty motor that replaced the older high-speed motors and reduction gears of previous classes. Besides increasing reliability and saving space, the new motors eliminated the characteristic loud whine produced by the reduction gear. This motor was ready in time to be installed on new boats commissioned from July 1944 onwards. A quieter boat is harder to find.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”