Port blockade versus port interdiction question

WarPlan Pacific is an operational level wargame which covers all the nations at war in the Pacific theatre from December 1941 to 1945 on a massive game scale.

Moderator: AlvaroSousa

Post Reply
User avatar
Christolos
Posts: 1002
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:45 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Port blockade versus port interdiction question

Post by Christolos »

This question also applies to WPE.

My question is; what is the difference between blockading a port and using port interdiction in terms of impacting the amount of supplies reaching a particular port?

Is it that blockading a port completely blocks all supplies, whereas port interdiction only prevents a certain amount of supplies by actually attacking transports which can result in lost MMS?

Can blockading a port also result in sinking enemy MMS?

It seems that in WPE, with the exception of Malta and Gibraltar, which can be blockaded according to the scenario notes, that the two terms are used interchangeably, but my understanding is that only Malta and Gibraltar can be blockaded, and all other ports can only be interdicted. Is this so?

A search of the WPE manual with the term "blockade" turns up no results...

C

“Excellence is never an accident. It is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, and intelligent execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives - choice, not chance, determines your destiny.”

-Aristotle-
eskuche
Posts: 1152
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2018 2:29 am
Location: OH, USA

RE: Port blockade versus port interdiction question

Post by eskuche »

Blockade should definitely have results. IIRC 3 vessels can block any port, 1 can block small islands. From my experience at Manila blockade prevents all shipment but requires adjacency. Interdiction can be from further away and attacks MM. I think.
Post Reply

Return to “Warplan Pacific”