Soviet oob's

SPWaW is a tactical squad-level World War II game on single platoon or up to an entire battalion through Europe and the Pacific (1939 to 1945).

Moderator: MOD_SPWaW

Post Reply
Pack Rat
Posts: 591
Joined: Mon May 08, 2000 8:00 am
Location: north central Pennsylvania USA

Soviet oob's

Post by Pack Rat »

Does anyone know if the encyclopedia is correct for the Soviets?

------------------

Your mine is a terrible thing to lose.
Pack Rat
PR
john g
Posts: 911
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: college station, tx usa

Post by john g »

Originally posted by Pack Rat:
Does anyone know if the encyclopedia is correct for the Soviets?

I may be going out on a limb, but I think I can state that there are at least one error in every oob. If you think something is wrong let us know and we can all fix it, just this morning I saw that in the Canadian oob, the 3in AA gun comes up as firing a tank mg.
thanks, John.


User avatar
Redleg
Posts: 1317
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Redleg »

Soviet OOB has two significant errors I know about:

1. Partisans have sniper rifles which should be taken away.
2. Soviet Guards infantry becomes available in Oct 43 - guards infantry formations prior to Oct 43 are a basket case and need fixing.

User avatar
Warhorse
Posts: 5373
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Birdsboro, PA, USA
Contact:

Post by Warhorse »

The Soviet oob is just now getting tackled!! Please post observations for this oob here, thanks.

------------------
Mike Amos
Meine Ehre Heisst Treue
Mike Amos

Meine Ehre heißt Treue
www.cslegion.com
Joe Osborne
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Somewhere on a beach
Contact:

Post by Joe Osborne »

I agree with the points Redleg made...PLUS puhleeze reduce the AT strength of the Cossacks....I mean riding on a horse....lighting a bottle of gas then acurately throwing, hitting, and destroying a tank....I know they were ferocious fighters BUT.....


Proof of this is when I've played PBEM games against Russians I seem to run into Cossacks and Partisans as much as T-34's Image

Joe Osborne
john g
Posts: 911
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: college station, tx usa

Post by john g »

Originally posted by Joe Osborne:
I agree with the points Redleg made...PLUS puhleeze reduce the AT strength of the Cossacks....I mean riding on a horse....lighting a bottle of gas then acurately throwing, hitting, and destroying a tank....I know they were ferocious fighters BUT.....


Proof of this is when I've played PBEM games against Russians I seem to run into Cossacks and Partisans as much as T-34's Image

Joe Osborne
The game does seem to make horse cavalry too effective, if real life was like the game they never would have been phased out of service. Japanese lt cavalry owns the jungle, they can keep up with any force retreating away from them, something that AC or tanks can't do. Were there any battles where tanks, partisans and cossacks all took part? I could see two out of the three working together, but they seemed to have different spheres of influence.

If you are seeing the same force mix game after game, perhaps your opponent has found a mix of units that works for him. The trick is to plan your response to take advantage of their being in a rut. Knowing what they are fielding as an army ahead of time is 50% towards knowing what they are going to do.
thanks, John.


Harry
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Aachen, Germany

Post by Harry »

You can buy a rifle squad with the automatic tokarev(?) rifle starting in 1940(?) till 1943 but not beyond.(slot 158)
Ok.. I have read a book, and they say that snipers are using this rifle too in 1941, but hole formations ?

You can buy Paratroopers in 1941 with RPG-3 (?).....



[This message has been edited by Harry (edited December 08, 2000).]
User avatar
skukko
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by skukko »

Horses,mules all with legs adapted can get on the roofs at the houses. This is common, not just sovjets. But it could be nice way to get get Tiger´on the roof...hmm..-I'll try at once : )
salute

mosh

If its not rotten, shoot again
panda124c
Posts: 1517
Joined: Tue May 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Houston, TX, USA

Post by panda124c »

Ok I have a bug for you in the Russian OOB. The Russians receive captured Panzerfaust 100(range 3) between two and three months before the Germans can purchase them. Very frustarating when the Russians have better German weapons than the Germans.
Charles22
Posts: 875
Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Post by Charles22 »

I suppose this is technically a German OOB bug, and I'm not sure if it's still that way, but what pbear says reminds me of the captured T34s for the Germans. In the Russian OOBs, the T34 shows the sbility to carry an entire Russian sqaud (12), but when the Germans capture it some of the handles must automatically slip off the tank or something, because it no longer will carry 12, and I believe it's 8 or less (in other words, it can't carry a whole German squad).

I'm pretty sure I know why this was done, but I don't think the German OOB decision maker realised the silliness of a tank changing hands somehow makes it unable to carry 12 men anymore.
amatteucci
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 14, 2000 8:00 am
Location: ITALY

Post by amatteucci »

Originally posted by Harry:
You can buy a rifle squad with the automatic tokarev(?) rifle starting in 1940(?) till 1943 but not beyond.(slot 158)
This is correct. In late 30s' early 40s'the RKKA was planning to make the new semiautomatic rifle the standard infantry weapon. By 1941 many units (especially in the Ukraine) had them. The outbreak of the war caused large quantities of those rifles to be lost to the German invaders, moreover the necessity of war ruled out such weapon since they were expensive and difficult to manufacture. So after 1941 those rifles were no more produced and the new staple weapon slowly became the realiable, rugged and cheap SMG.
Regards,

Amedeo
Kluckenbill
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA

Post by Kluckenbill »

Originally posted by Charles22:
I suppose this is technically a German OOB bug, and I'm not sure if it's still that way, but what pbear says reminds me of the captured T34s for the Germans. In the Russian OOBs, the T34 shows the sbility to carry an entire Russian sqaud (12), but when the Germans capture it some of the handles must automatically slip off the tank or something, because it no longer will carry 12, and I believe it's 8 or less (in other words, it can't carry a whole German squad).

I'm pretty sure I know why this was done, but I don't think the German OOB decision maker realised the silliness of a tank changing hands somehow makes it unable to carry 12 men anymore.
Perhaps they are trying to account for the girth of those healthy schnitzel-fed German youths. Image



------------------
Target, Cease Fire !
Target, Cease Fire !
Charles22
Posts: 875
Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Post by Charles22 »

Kluckenbill: You comment reminds me of Sgt. Schultz, which of course reminds me of Werner Klemperer (Klink) dying last night.
User avatar
Arralen
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun May 21, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Arralen »

Originally posted by Charles22:
I'm pretty sure I know why this was done, but I don't think the German OOB decision maker realised the silliness of a tank changing hands somehow makes it unable to carry 12 men anymore.
'Talking 'bout me ??


Remember - if you flame me, I'll flame you, and maybe I'll flame you anyway !

Image

PS: Seemingly everyone overlooked this up to now, and as I'm not that happy with the carry caps I'll change it with the next version Image


[This message has been edited by Arralen (edited December 08, 2000).]
AMD FX-4300
Gigabyte 970A-DS3P
Kingston 24GB DDR3-1600 (PC3-12800)
Asus GTX 750 Ti OC 2GB GDDR5
Kingston SV300 120 GB
Windows 8.1
Charles22
Posts: 875
Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Post by Charles22 »

Arralen: Actually.....I have mentioned it before, and the whole thing got started by the Russians being given tanks to carry full squads, while the Germans had none. At one time it seems only the Tigers and SGIIIBs (other SGs possibly too) had carrys of 10, but unless I'm mistaken none of the German stuff does now.
User avatar
Warhorse
Posts: 5373
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Birdsboro, PA, USA
Contact:

Post by Warhorse »

If I had my choice, I would say to let the carry cap. be what it may, they had certain capabilities, anyone foolish enough to get in my sight with a tankful of infantry, can pay the sometimes heavy casualty rate from fire while mounted?? But, it's not up to me, so....

------------------
Mike Amos
Meine Ehre Heisst Treue
Mike Amos

Meine Ehre heißt Treue
www.cslegion.com
Ivancito
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Santiago, Chile

Post by Ivancito »

I hope this is the right thread...

I started a Soviet WWII campaign but I was unable to buy any SPAA vehicles. They are listed in the unit selection, but clicking on the button does nothing.

This is v.4.4, BTW.
User avatar
Warhorse
Posts: 5373
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Birdsboro, PA, USA
Contact:

Post by Warhorse »

Ivancito, that's probably a case of class change, and no formation, or the dates are messed up, at work so can't check for certain, but in my personal version I fixed alot, and seemed to me that was the case, also alot of the tank formations in the misc menu don't work, someone nested too many formations Image

------------------
Mike Amos
Meine Ehre Heisst Treue
Mike Amos

Meine Ehre heißt Treue
www.cslegion.com
Post Reply

Return to “Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns”