Spending Soviet AP in 1942: CapandGown mirror match

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

Spending Soviet AP in 1942: CapandGown mirror match

Post by JoeLewis »

I wanted to try a shorter AAR that addressed my thoughts on the CapandGown (German) vs. Bitburger (Soviet)game. I slid in for Bitburger as the Soviet commander in June 1942 and I had a lot of questions about his excellent position in the game. This AAR is not a criticism in any way, but I just had a lot of questions so I will post some screenshots and talk about my thoughts on command and control, AP spending, and 1942 in general. I will keep this AAR about 5 turns behind where the game is right now.
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Thoughts on Soviet Organization in 1942: The Soviet Side of CapandGown's German mirror match

Post by JoeLewis »

Army at Max Toe for now – may need some modification going forward. 6.6 million men and 10,000 tanks. Oh!


TOE Balance at -36,400


Image
Attachments
Picture1.jpg
Picture1.jpg (32.02 KiB) Viewed 1387 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Thoughts on Soviet Organization in 1942: The Soviet Side of CapandGown's German mirror match

Post by JoeLewis »

Huge pools of reserves
400,000 manpower
1,000,000 armaments
3,500 T-34s

But major issue is to enter the spring of 1942 w/ 0 reserved rail for troops AND Moscow not evacuated!

Only 5,000 rail for troops in the spring! Is there a reason for this approach? Does 0% reserved rail increase supply to troops in addition to better rail for evacuation? I think that by June 1942 you need rail at 10-30% so you can rapidly respond to any German offensive.


Image
Attachments
Picture2.jpg
Picture2.jpg (92.32 KiB) Viewed 1388 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Thoughts on Soviet Organization in 1942: The Soviet Side of CapandGown's German mirror match

Post by JoeLewis »

More production numbers

Image
Attachments
Picture3.jpg
Picture3.jpg (81.13 KiB) Viewed 1387 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

Units assigned to STAVKA

Post by JoeLewis »

The next three images show the number of units assigned to STAVKA. In short, you have very few brigades but a lot of corps and divisions assigned to STAVKA. I think part of the issue is that all the armies and fronts are at max command. However, the large number of tank corps assigned to STAVKA were a real problem for me.


Here are some numbers:
26 corps assigned to STAVKA (20 of which were tank corps) - 20 tank corps not assigned to tank armies (which take a few turns to get operational and cost 25 AP each) are really poor for fighting. Would that 400 AP for those tank corps be better used for rifle corps? The Army needs 7 tank army HQs in total.


77 tank brigades and 75 tank battalions - most tank brigades assigned directly to individual armies for reserve combat. Each cavalry corps has 3 tank battalions per. Too much armor?


Only 25 infantry brigades in total. Usually you see hundreds of tank brigades assigned to STAVKA. not sure if Bitburger merged brigades into divisions or disbanded them. Like I said, his approach is clearly excellent with the numbers of soldiers he has. However, the lack of rifle brigades makes forming corps difficult. A three-division rifle corps is not as efficient because it goes way over the TOE of a regular rifle corps. Isn't the 2 division +1 brigade model more efficient?


Image
Attachments
Picture7.jpg
Picture7.jpg (243.13 KiB) Viewed 1387 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Units assigned to STAVKA

Post by JoeLewis »

A lot of rifle divisions assigned directly to STAVKA. However, these units make useful replacements!

Image
Attachments
Picture8.jpg
Picture8.jpg (345.23 KiB) Viewed 1387 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Units assigned to STAVKA

Post by JoeLewis »

Very few brigades available to STAVKA for potential rifle corps assignment. Assigning rifle brigades to field armies also limits the flexibility of where you form rifle corps, but does increase your reserve capabilities.

Image
Attachments
Picture9.jpg
Picture9.jpg (282.37 KiB) Viewed 1387 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

Start of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

i took over this game at the start of Soviet Turn 54 after several major German encirclements. Here are my thoughts on the initial dispositions. Bitburger had some excellent fortifications throughout, mostly level 3 w/ plenty of in-depth defenses.

Northern Command has a lot of units on the Finnish frontier. Some players may consider it gamey to build fortifications here to free up divisions and brigades. I don't. The Germans have plenty of fuel in 1942, which is ahistorical as it is. Also, version 1.12.06 has a bad armor fuel bug that can provide German mech divisions unlimited fuel. So I didn't feel bad about building forts here, esp. considering it costs a lot of AP.

Image
Attachments
Picture10.jpg
Picture10.jpg (645.3 KiB) Viewed 1387 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Start of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

Bitburger's defenses were too strong in a few areas. You will see how I make the decision early on to transfer 1 x field army from the three northern fronts which were clearly not in any danger of a sudden German attack. Of course that meant thinning these lines, but I figured the bad terrain gave me plenty of reaction time in case the Germans suddenly made a major northern push, which is usually unlikely in 1942 (unless you are playing gmtello who destroyed a lot of my northern units in another game!).



Image
Attachments
Picture11.jpg
Picture11.jpg (389.07 KiB) Viewed 1387 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Start of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

Another picture of Bitburger's excellent defenses. My only gripe was the lack of available rail. With only 5,000 rail this turn I was limited in how many reinforcements I could send this direction. CapandGown clearly put all his effort into this area for most of the early summer turns.

The other issue is the limited strength of those 20 tank corps. Those units were assigned to Front commands early on to beef up their CV numbers since all the armies were at full strength. There was only so much I could do until Turn 55 when Tank Army HQs could be built.

Image
Attachments
Picture14.jpg
Picture14.jpg (906.29 KiB) Viewed 1387 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Start of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

Where is the cavalry? You found it ... at Stalingrad! There are some strong secondary and tertiary defenses here between the Donets and Volga Rivers. However, are those defenses a waste of mobile reserves if the Germans put most of their effort somewhere else? If anything, keeping the cavalry corps on rails would allow you to respond more effectively. I also like to keep the cavalry corps west of major rivers to preserve their MPs for counterattacks. That may sound crazy to some, but cavalry is not there to dig in 1942.

Southern Front is also very vulnerable here and - eventually - gets almost completely encircled in a later turn.

DON'T DEFEND STALINO! The Stalino defenses are clearly a bad idea as I have learned from painful experiences. Too easy for one armor penetration to reach the Sea of Azov, as redrum pointed out to me.

Looks like only one panzer army down here at max so a lot of the cavalry has to move north to plug in the gap by Moscow. Is it too gamey to build defenses this far in the rear over the winter?


Image
Attachments
Picture15.jpg
Picture15.jpg (706.52 KiB) Viewed 1390 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Start of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

Overall, I was very excited to take over from Bitburger, who was clearly a tank officer in another life (or perhaps this one). Even taking over with a few encircled units is not a big deal considering the massive fortifications and manpower/production reserves available. 1942 is all about surviving as much as possible while keeping the big cities (Stalingrad, Moscow, Leningrad) in your hands.
Bitburger
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 7:14 pm

RE: Start of Turn 54

Post by Bitburger »

Hi, and good luck in the game. The germans are going to run amok in the summer and i wasn't planning to even try to stop them until the fall. The tanks and cavalry are well back to keep them safe and trained up and are easily detached from stavka piecemeal if needed. The infantry brigades were all merged to strengthen divisions and you have enough new divisions now to build corps using three divisions. Sure they form overstrength, but that's a good problem. As you say the army is huge, with a half million men pool, so i wasn't concerned about stalino. Sacrificing those troops there for even a couple of weeks delay means maybe the germans fall a week or two critically out of weather unable to achieve victory,and no quality troops were in the pocket anyways. The high tank numbers were achieved by building about 75 tank brigades, which were intended for quickly merging with the 24 tank corps as they take heavy losses if you commit them in summer 42.
Bitburger
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 7:14 pm

RE: Start of Turn 54

Post by Bitburger »

So you are entering summer 42 holding Leningrad, Moskow, Rostov, and recently suffering a few setbacks much like in real war. Both sides are much bigger than historical though. You can afford heavy manpower losses, and it won't be german losses that stop the germans in this drive either.
Leningrad is indeed overdefended, but in a month you will be sure you have deterred him and you will then hold Leningrad for rest of game. Those units on Finnish side are there to gain experience and be quick reinforcements if needed, fortified zones won't do that for you.
Moskow is heavily defended, you have lot's of time to evacuate the remaining industry if needed, why waste the downtime on production unless it's needed? No reserve rail seems to help supply the large army. He's hitting hard in the center, but a right hook around city without a left hook is unlikely to succeed.
He's going hard to drive deep in the center, keep your quality units intact, ready to defend your stop lines, and you'll survive 42. Victory is pretty tough without leningrad and moskow, no matter how many vp they pick up in the deep center.
Come 43, you'll be happy the germans are so far extended.

JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: Start of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

Bitburger, thanks for all your suggestions! Like I said, I am just offering up my ideas on the current situation, and am nowhere near the quality of player you are.

The 7th Independent Army divisions were still at 35 morale so I have been walking them from the Finnish border due to the lack of rail while replacing them with forts. They gain morale a lot faster as long as you keep them 10 hexes away from the front and on rail lines.
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

End of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

How I chose to spend my 60 AP. I know some players may think it sacrilege to build anything but rifle corps in 1942. Anyways:

25 AP for 1 Tank Army HQ. I felt the large number of tank corps warranted this measure.

8 AP on new air formations (4 fighters/ 4 tac bombers). There are only 3 VVS bases at Moscow so I will spend some effort on them in this year. I think that VVS bases and partisans are still very useful the longer the war goes on esp. as the Soviets start counterattacking more.

15 AP on Reserved Rail to bring it up from 0.

12 AP on 3 Finnish fortifications (set at 35% TOE) to free up 7th Independent Army for redeployment
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: End of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

Excellent fortifications from Leningrad down to Rzhev. All factories already evacuated. No panzers in that area and denuded German front lines. That means that 3 armies from Volkhov, Northwest, and Leningrad Fronts can make their way southeast. They have to walk of course because of the lack of available rail.


Image
Attachments
541.jpg
541.jpg (308.86 KiB) Viewed 1390 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: End of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

My guess on the German most likely course of action: CapandGown wants to extend the Moscow defenses east before making the real attack north. He wants me to diver reinforcements and digging time against his spearhead, then he will be able to do a few HQBUs and bring in his southern panzers north for the real push on a denuded Moscow line. 2nd Option: go to Murom and sever the eastern Moscow rail lines …. Because Moscow’s factories have not been evacuated even though we are sitting at 130,000 factory rail!

Two new formations formed with the Moscow MD and Moscow Defensive Zone Headquarters. These are not ideal for this command structure, but the Soviets are out of army headquarters.

4 fronts and 2 MDs are now fighting this main German thrust, and all of Voronezh Front’s four shock armies (full of cavalry corps) is moving overland to Tambov. There are also 5 Guards Rifle corps in the Moscow defenses that have moved east to give them some more operating space. I think this defense is good enough to counterattack any blows with Guards Rifle Corps in the north and the shock cavalry armies to the southeast.
A lot of air HQs transferred here to start bombing the German Air Force more often. All national reserve planes put into the front lines. It is time for war. You can earn morale through combat not sitting in Moscow drinking Vodka.


Image
Attachments
542.jpg
542.jpg (269.58 KiB) Viewed 1390 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

RE: End of Turn 54

Post by JoeLewis »

Ok, I have a lot of thoughts about this area:

1) the 2 destroyed Caucasus armies will return for free and can be sent to areas like Stalingrad or even Moscow to rebuild experience and morale.

2) only one major panzer formation looks like 1 Panzer Army committed to this area just for a temporary pocket. I imagine once the infantry front lines meet, this panzer army will do another major attack or move north.

3) very poor rail in this area and not a lot of maneuverability. I doubt the Germans will drive southeast far from their other major spearhead. Give them a few turns to reduce the pocket and gobble up the terrain. Then withdraw again.

However, just in case I am wrong and there is more of a danger here, I have left 4 guards divisions, 1 guards corps, and 4 tank corps for now.


Image
Attachments
545.jpg
545.jpg (420.95 KiB) Viewed 1390 times
JoeLewis
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 12:50 am

Start of Turn 55

Post by JoeLewis »

Start of Turn 55
60 AP Total Spending
-25 for another Tank Army HQ
-10 for increasing reserved rail for troop movement
-8 for new squadrons
-1 for an airbase - we don't have any staging bases
-16 for 4 forts on the Finnish border
-2 for division transfer to another HQ
-3 for support units for future rifle corps: 1 x flamethrower tank, 1 x MG Artillery, and 1 x Ski Battalion

No rifle corps have been built yet two weeks into taking over this game. I wonder if that is a mistake?
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”