Zenox drew the short straw with colony suitability

The Galaxy Lives On! Distant Worlds, the critically acclaimed 4X space strategy game is back with a brand new 64-bit engine, 3D graphics and a polished interface to begin an epic new Distant Worlds series with Distant Worlds 2. Distant Worlds 2 is a vast, pausable real-time 4X space strategy game. Experience the full depth and detail of turn-based strategy, but with the simplicity and ease of real-time, and on the scale of a massively-multiplayer online game.

Moderator: MOD_DW2

Post Reply
User avatar
boolybooly
Posts: 110
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 6:38 pm

Zenox drew the short straw with colony suitability

Post by boolybooly »

I think the RND for Zenox worlds is broken.

The ice planets have lower base suitability than desert planets as Savannah quality range starts at 35-55 whereas Tundra starts at 30-60.

Zenox only get +25 on their best world type Ice Tundra when Teekan get +30 for theirs. This is a real penalty for Zenox, if you do the math, because it means their best quality Tundra colony only cancels out 5 less suitability boost but at the low end of the quality range they lose colonies which they cannot colonise equal to a sixth i.e. 16.7% of the world type because the minimum colony they can colonise is 35 and the world range is 30-60.

Whereas Teekan can colonise anything 30+ which means all their planets.

That is theory. In reality e.g. my current game with NORMAL colony prevalence, I surveyed over 50 systems to a range of over 100m and found a dozen ice worlds including 6 Tundra planets and only one of these had a suitability over 20. In a recent teekan game with RARE prevalence, they had four Teekan desert planet colonies at this stage due to an abundance of habitable desert planets with suitability over 20. So Zenox have in practice less than half of what Teekan get.

Out of the five unusable Tundra planets, two have quality 26% which should not even be possible, they are supposed to start at 30% which looks broken to me, how can they be less than the minimum quality range for the planet type?

I just feel like something is broken for ice worlds and the Zenox.
Attachments
Zenox suitability 02.jpg
Zenox suitability 02.jpg (1.06 MiB) Viewed 457 times
User avatar
Nightskies
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:00 am
Location: Colorado

Re: Zenox drew the short straw with colony suitability

Post by Nightskies »

Most empires should be grabbing up independents before going for any but the most lucrative worlds. Even without independents, the Zenox more than make up for it with the best ships overall. This comes from very strong shields (Zenox racial shields AND their ships have the most defense slots across the board) and they have a very good racial weapon.

However, you are correct that they suffer from a relatively rough ability to colonize (for a primary race). They also suffer from poor population growth, but their tech and espionage bonus more than make up for that.

Nothing broken here.
Jorgen_CAB
Posts: 861
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:53 pm

Re: Zenox drew the short straw with colony suitability

Post by Jorgen_CAB »

Nightskies wrote: Sat Oct 01, 2022 9:06 pm Nothing broken here.
I would agree, you need to look at the species as a whole and not just one value.
Post Reply

Return to “Distant Worlds 2”