Difference

Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific is a turn-based strategy game. It offers a comprehensive experience of the Pacific Theater, challenging you to achieve victory in one of history's greatest conflicts.
Post Reply
Widukind59
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2023 8:32 pm

Difference

Post by Widukind59 »

Hello,
i just bought "War in the pacific Admiral edition" bcause it is detailed an complex. What about War in the pacific Strategic command? its compare to WIP?
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 3042
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Yoyodyne Propulsion Systems

Re: Difference

Post by Platoonist »

Widukind59 wrote: Sun Sep 15, 2024 11:50 am Hello,
i just bought "War in the pacific Admiral edition" bcause it is detailed an complex. What about War in the pacific Strategic command? its compare to WIP?
I own both and there are a lot of contrasts. This game is far simpler and less involved but plays a lot faster and is quicker to learn. Some prime examples are that SC:WitP doesn't track factors like oil use, pilot training, dock space or model the individual ship, aircraft or weapon types and thousands of base locations. However, a campaign game can be played out in a few days, and it doesn't take a week just to input the opening moves. With Admiral's Edition's intricate detail and slower pace, a game can take months, and the AI needs a lot of "cheats" to help it manage the meticulous nuts and bolts of the game's mechanics. For games against a human player, you'll need somebody willing to "go the distance" as some AARs have gone on for years. As far as I can tell the AI in this game doesn't cheat. At least not that I've seen.

Depends on what you want. A very faithful game on the Pacific War but which has a quite steep learning curve and requires a major time investment to play. Or something simpler and breezier but skims over much of the logistical, tactical and economic detail.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII: War in the Pacific”