A2A Guns WEZ avoidance

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
User avatar
Lace
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 12:57 pm
Location: EGNT/LFMQ

A2A Guns WEZ avoidance

Post by Lace »

I have had a few scenarios (currently one of the 'Fail Safe' collection) where early jet fighters are attacking large recce or bomber aircraft fitted with tailguns. The attacking aircraft will only attack from the rear putting them directly into a very limited WEZ. Is there a way to force an off axis or diving/climbing attack? I seem to lose a lot of aircraft to these lumbering, non-manoeuvring beasts which strikes me as a little suicidal and unrealistic.
Nikel
Posts: 2130
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:51 am

Re: A2A Guns WEZ avoidance

Post by Nikel »

May you post a save or name the scenario?
User avatar
Lace
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 12:57 pm
Location: EGNT/LFMQ

Re: A2A Guns WEZ avoidance

Post by Lace »

It's not specific to a single scenario or aircraft type, just more of a general observation on the (seemingly) flawed tactics by the fighter AI.
slimatwar
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 2:22 pm
Location: Hellas

Re: A2A Guns WEZ avoidance

Post by slimatwar »

I confirm this issue.Especially when early jet fighters carry rear-aspect short range missiles(like AIM-9B), they become easy prey for tail guns.The AIM-9B is useless unless the jet approaches from the rear and close.The only solution is to set up the WRA to stop using such A2A missiles against aircraft with tail mounted guns.
thewood1
Posts: 10056
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Boston

Re: A2A Guns WEZ avoidance

Post by thewood1 »

slimatwar wrote: Wed Jul 02, 2025 2:09 pm I confirm this issue.Especially when early jet fighters carry rear-aspect short range missiles(like AIM-9B), they become easy prey for tail guns.The AIM-9B is useless unless the jet approaches from the rear and close.The only solution is to set up the WRA to stop using such A2A missiles against aircraft with tail mounted guns.
I think that is a different issue. The attack angle the AI takes on bombers ignores the risk of the tail gun regardless of the weapon is the OP's issue. Your issue is that for you unit to get close enough to a bomber to score a kill with an AIM-9B, you get hit by tail gun shots. That latter one is an actual real life issue. The AIM-9B has a very poor chance of a kill above 1nm. While the 23mm tail gun on a Tu-4 has a range out to over 1nm.

The result means you are taking a significant risk trying to hit an alerted bomber with a tailgun, even a .50 setup on a B-29. There were some tactics to help with that, but they were limited by the weak IR seeker on the AIM-9B. Much of this was validated in the 1950/60s China/Taiwan air battles where AIM-9Bs were used fairly extensively.
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”