AI's use of SUs and HQ placements

Please posts your wishlists, new feature and interface tweak requests here for the developers to review.

Moderator: Joel Billings

Post Reply
User avatar
Wiedrock
Posts: 1986
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:44 pm
Location: Germany

AI's use of SUs and HQ placements

Post by Wiedrock »

The AI is unable to keep HQs in proximity to the subordinate CUs. Therefore there are barely any SU commitments.
Why not just remove the "5-Hex range"-rule and the "30MP max"-rule for the distance of SUs comitted into battles when player is set to be AI?
Attachments
AI-Leaders1.png
AI-Leaders1.png (369.04 KiB) Viewed 302 times
AI-Leaders2.png
AI-Leaders2.png (1.25 MiB) Viewed 302 times
User avatar
Wiedrock
Posts: 1986
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:44 pm
Location: Germany

Re: AI's use of SUs and HQ placements

Post by Wiedrock »

It's almost like the Ai code (for Axis, while having the Initiative) would say:
"do not be in 5 Hex range" while it should say "do"
and/or
"do overstack HQs CP" while it should say "do not".

Russians on the defense/no initiative look way better at "keeping their HQ/CUs together", but are also only in 5Hex range by chance since the priority seems to be to place HQs on top of Depots instead.
Once Russians gain initiative they improve Army placement further and so do the Axis without Initiative, suddenly the HQs and CUs stick together.

Some Axis initiative examples.
Attachments
Leaders 4.png
Leaders 4.png (1.9 MiB) Viewed 298 times
AI-Leaders3.png
AI-Leaders3.png (2.15 MiB) Viewed 298 times
Post Reply

Return to “Feature Suggestions”