Range value discrepancy between stated DB-viewer value and in-sim calcs & display on "Unit Status"

[Knightpawn]

I have a case where a the description says that a loadout's tac range is 180nm, but if one actually launches the unit the range seems to be +2x than that. Do I report this in the forum or as a DB issue?

[blu3s]

Is it the text description htat is on top on the DB viewier or the loadout box description?

If the later, it's a DB thing.

[tylerblakebrandon]

Is this necessarily an issue? What is the unit involved? The loadout should contain a buffer and the range should be enough to account for a round trip back to base even with some stores still aboard without the maximum possible range buff from expending all stores and the weight/drag reduction.

[Kushan04]

I have a case where a the description says that a loadout's tac range is 180nm, but if one actually launches the unit the range seems to be +2x than that. Do I report this in the forum or as a DB issue?

The loadout ranges shown are nominal, they're going to vary in reality depending on the current altitude and speed of the aircraft...

[Knightpawn]

i am hesitant to report it as an issue. But when I read 180nm range for loadout 37x Marines, I expect this is the tactical range I have to plan around. I don't expect something like this (launch one and observe practical range).