Question on the future of UV

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

Post Reply
User avatar
general billy
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 10:40 am
Location: London UK

Question on the future of UV

Post by general billy »

Since WiTp has gone gold, how long can can we wait to expect a new patch for Uncomman Valour.
Will we get a list of the bugs to be fixed?
Image
WITP Games
Scen 16 as Allied = Lost
Scen 13 as Jap = Won
Scen 15 as Allied = Won
Scen 16 as Jap = NA
WPO Games
Scen 6 as Allied = Won
Scen 6 as Japs = NA
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by Feinder »

It will be "a while". I wouldn't expect to see any sort of retrofit for UV, for at least 6 months, and maybe longer.

I certainly don't work for Matrix, but just from the discussion on the WitP boards, I'd wouldn't look for an upgrade to the UV engine for at least 6 months.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
elmo3
Posts: 5797
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by elmo3 »

Here is a partial answer from Joel Billings in a WitP thread:

"...Next month after WitP has hit the streets we'll sit down and figure out what we can or can't do with UV vs WitP. My gut tells me that features will not be brought to UV as the time it would take to do it (if even possible)would make no sense for anyone interested in our games except those that will only own UV (and if there are many of those people in the world we won't be in business next year [:)] ). "
We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester
User avatar
mbatch729
Posts: 534
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 8:00 am
Location: North Carolina

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by mbatch729 »

What should be next is WITM, or War in the Med. [:D]
Later,
FC3(SW) Batch
USS Iowa
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by Nomad »

I think UV is a fine game if they would/could patch it to get rid of the remaining bugs. I would rather not see them try to add features from WitP.
User avatar
Drex
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Chico,california

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by Drex »

i think UV should be thought of as a finished game. There are too many games in development that come first. We must all live with the "bugs".
Col Saito: "Don't speak to me of rules! This is war! It is not a game of cricket!"
scorryuk
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:36 pm

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by scorryuk »

I`ll second that. From a business point of view it wouldn`t make financial sense to devote any more man hours to UV. I`m sure WITP will have it`s fair share of bugs to iron out. Besides UV may not be perfect but few PC games ever are and right now it`s still top of it`s class.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by Nomad »

I would agree if they had to track the bugs down starting from gound zero. But, most ot the routines were used in WitP and they have indicated that they have found the source of the bugs, so a patch to fix those should be fairly easy. UV with its different hex size is a game of its own and I plan to continue to play PBEM games as long as I can find opponents. It would be a better experience if some ot the bugs were fixed.
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by Von Rom »

ORIGINAL: Nomad

I would agree if they had to track the bugs down starting from gound zero. But, most ot the routines were used in WitP and they have indicated that they have found the source of the bugs, so a patch to fix those should be fairly easy. UV with its different hex size is a game of its own and I plan to continue to play PBEM games as long as I can find opponents. It would be a better experience if some ot the bugs were fixed.

I agree if it's possible and not too much trouble.

And there is no need to rush it either, since Matrix will have its hands full with WiTP.

There is no need for any new features, but fixing a few of the most obvious bugs would be very welcome. I would also like to see the ground combat balanced a bit more as in WiTP.

Since UV is a smaller game than WiTP, there is no reason why it still cannot generate income for Matrix for a long time to come.

Cheers!
User avatar
Grumbling Grogn
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 8:31 am
Location: Texas!
Contact:

RE: Question on the future of UV

Post by Grumbling Grogn »

ORIGINAL: elmo3

Here is a partial answer from Joel Billings in a WitP thread:

"...Next month after WitP has hit the streets we'll sit down and figure out what we can or can't do with UV vs WitP. My gut tells me that features will not be brought to UV as the time it would take to do it (if even possible)would make no sense for anyone interested in our games except those that will only own UV (and if there are many of those people in the world we won't be in business next year [:)] ). "


I love this. A candid. Honest. Realistic answer. And from someone that develops software! What in the hell will they think of next! [:D]

oh, and I think he has hit the nail on the head. [8D]

GG
The Grumbling Grognard
Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”