Reducing big troop concentrations

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Grouchy
Posts: 1016
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Nuenen, Noord-Brabant, Nederland
Contact:

Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Grouchy »

Here's the situation. I'm almost done occupying Luzon (PHI).
It did go rather smoothly, and I just found out why. According recon the AI has moved 35 units to Bataan!
Now I got some small *cough* problems to get rid of those 35 units. They are fortified and basically have he numbers.
So how to reduce those troops asap?

With a 14" coastal battery sitting there even travelling through the hex is costly. You get results like this:

Image
Attachments
Clipboard02.jpg
Clipboard02.jpg (72.19 KiB) Viewed 272 times
Image
User avatar
Arnir
Posts: 482
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 11:07 pm
Location: Alberta. In Texas.

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Arnir »

Take this with a grain of salt as it comes from UV, more that WitP, but:

I would assume that you should shift some serious air assets into bombing and strafing the troops to up their disruption factor and lower their morale. Plus keep them cut off from supplies.

None of this is earth shattering, but beyond stealing at atomic bomb via time travel, I can't think of much else to suggest.
User avatar
Odin
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Wanne-Eickel

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Odin »

Hm, i´ve not yet WITP, but my suggestion is let them there and let them starve to death...is this base really that important for you to slaughter your own men?
Image
Hammer2001
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:36 pm

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Hammer2001 »

Those troops will be isolate unless the allied make an effort to suply them in dangerous waters. I think it will be a good oportunity to sink some allied cargo or even warships. It should divert allied units from better missions.
User avatar
Grouchy
Posts: 1016
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Nuenen, Noord-Brabant, Nederland
Contact:

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Grouchy »

ORIGINAL: Odin

Hm, i´ve not yet WITP, but my suggestion is let them there and let them starve to death...is this base really that important for you to slaughter your own men?

The base is not that important, but i got a tight shedule to keep and can really use those troops elsewhere. Need to occupy those Oz beer factories asap. With only skunky US and Canadian beer, alllied morale will collapse and the world will be mine! [;)]
Image
User avatar
DoomedMantis
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by DoomedMantis »

A fair proportion of those 35 units are base units, AA etc. Once your troops go in, you will quickly reduce them due to lack of supply
I shall make it a felony to drink small beer.

- Shakespeare
User avatar
DoomedMantis
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by DoomedMantis »

I would suggest using air power to soften them up as well, and destroy some of there supply
I shall make it a felony to drink small beer.

- Shakespeare
User avatar
2Stepper
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 11:16 pm
Location: North Burbs of Omaha
Contact:

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by 2Stepper »

<bump>

Yep! Go after port and airfield in the hex with airpower. This will do a number on their supplies and you can move in. I've taken down a superior Japanese force with roughly 2/3rd allied before using this same tactic. And to enhance the effectiveness of your air power? Send recon planes with them. They take BDA pictures to make the bombing more effective... Sounds overly technical, but it works...

They'll be sawing off wood chips for bullets and eating leaves in no time. LOL! Then you can go after the aussie beer. [8D][:D]
Image
"Send in the Infantry. Tanks cost money... the dead cost nothing..." :)
User avatar
Grouchy
Posts: 1016
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Nuenen, Noord-Brabant, Nederland
Contact:

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Grouchy »

ORIGINAL: Hammer2001

Those troops will be isolate unless the allied make an effort to suply them in dangerous waters. I think it will be a good oportunity to sink some allied cargo or even warships. It should divert allied units from better missions.

Ooh yes, there where plenty of warships at Bataan. Recon showed TF's containing several CA's. In response i redeployed a lot of air to Clark field.

Out of my head Hr.Ms. Java, Tromp, De Ruyter, Exeter, Durban and ships of smaller classes where attacked [:)]


[edit]

Thanks for the reponses, gonna start to destroy their supplies. After that I'm going to commit my troops and see what will happens.
Image
User avatar
Charles2222
Posts: 3687
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Charles2222 »

ORIGINAL: DoomedMantis

I would suggest using air power to soften them up as well, and destroy some of there supply

bombardment TF's wouldn't hurt either.
User avatar
Hoplosternum
Posts: 663
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 8:39 pm
Location: Romford, England

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Hoplosternum »

Charles - there is a very nasty Coastal battery with 14" guns ready to punish your Bombardment TFs. Perhaps best to hold off on those Bombardment runs to Bataan [:D]
User avatar
Odin
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Wanne-Eickel

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Odin »

14"´s are a good argument to stay on distance.

A Battleship can get hurt....bombardement can be expensive[;)]
Image
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Xargun »

I personally would build up the forts in the nearby bases, leave some good units (divisions) so he doesn't break out and just let his men starve.. Come back in a month or so and attack. Use some bombardments (air and artillery) and then deliberate attack.. By then they should be combat ineffective.

Xargun
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Mr.Frag »

Keep in mind, you don't need to kill them. Wait a month for them to starve. Bombard them with your troops to burn up supplies. Eventually they will go under without major losses on your side.

This game is not about winning a fight, anyone can do that. It is about winning the fight *effectively* while taking the minimum losses to your own troops. There is a huge difference between those two.
User avatar
Charles2222
Posts: 3687
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Charles2222 »

ORIGINAL: Hoplosternum

Charles - there is a very nasty Coastal battery with 14" guns ready to punish your Bombardment TFs. Perhaps best to hold off on those Bombardment runs to Bataan [:D]

Oh, well just wait for the Yamoto then[:D].
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Mr.Frag »

ORIGINAL: Charles_22
ORIGINAL: Hoplosternum

Charles - there is a very nasty Coastal battery with 14" guns ready to punish your Bombardment TFs. Perhaps best to hold off on those Bombardment runs to Bataan [:D]

Oh, well just wait for the Yamoto then[:D].

Also note the mines [X(]

Also note that getting to Manila goes *through* Bataan's hex so you'll get hit twice. [X(]
User avatar
Titanwarrior89
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 4:07 pm
Location: arkansas
Contact:

RE: Reducing big troop concentrations

Post by Titanwarrior89 »

Geez, Ive got to write that one down.[:D] Soundly put.[;)]
ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

Keep in mind, you don't need to kill them. Wait a month for them to starve. Bombard them with your troops to burn up supplies. Eventually they will go under without major losses on your side.

This game is not about winning a fight, anyone can do that. It is about winning the fight *effectively* while taking the minimum losses to your own troops. There is a huge difference between those two.
"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”