Is the play a nice mix between Axis&Allies and Hearts of Iron

Gary Grigsby's World At War gives you the chance to really run a world war. History is yours to write and things may turn out differently. The Western Allies may be conquered by Germany, or Japan may defeat China. With you at the controls, leading the fates of nations and alliances. Take command in this dynamic turn-based game and test strategies that long-past generals and world leaders could only dream of. Now anything is possible in this new strategic offering from Matrix Games and 2 by 3 Games.

Moderators: Joel Billings, JanSorensen

Post Reply
Rocko911
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 3:13 am

Is the play a nice mix between Axis&Allies and Hearts of Iron

Post by Rocko911 »

I was curious is the gameplay a nice balance of gameplay that is more strategic in nature versus specific battle oriented. I may get blasted here but , i really thought Axis and Allies was a pretty good game but lacked in depth. I am hoping this game will be what that one was missing. I personally have been looking for a more strategic game with enough depth (or configurable by player option) to make it interesting for long term play. I just hope it doesnt get bogged down by too many factors to be considered for each turn that it feels as though you are going through a painfull experience to enjoy a short lived victory on a couple of battle fronts.
User avatar
paullus99
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Is the play a nice mix between Axis&Allies and Hearts of Iron

Post by paullus99 »

I think you will find game play to be extremely rewarding. Though the maps do make it look a bit like A&A - there is so much more going on here.....its still designed to be fairly simple (and hit a wider audience) - though the grogs certainly won't be disappointed.
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...
User avatar
Becket
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 6:42 pm

RE: Is the play a nice mix between Axis&Allies and Hearts of Iron

Post by Becket »

I'm only disappointed because my email server is down, and I can't receive any turns. [:@][:@][:@]

"The very word Moscow meant a lot to all of us....it meant all we had ever fought for" -Rokossovsky
Rocko911
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 3:13 am

RE: Is the play a nice mix between Axis&Allies and Hearts of Iron

Post by Rocko911 »

Thanks for the info, who knows maybe i will be lucky enough to be select for the latest beta testers!![&o]
User avatar
j campbell
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI

RE: Is the play a nice mix between Axis&Allies and Hearts of Iron

Post by j campbell »

this game is definitely easy to pick up and play but takes alot of getting the little things down for the hardcore gamers such as myself. i think Maurice has the rulebook memorized but i am playing alot of Axis to become more efficient with my moes and expenditures. Supply is critical.

the game is awesome because it really make u force decisions and there are critical trade offs to be made based on factors that differ in each game. if your opponent out researches u in 1 area u often need to keep up. do u produce that extra inf unit to hold the line or put down partisans or produce a supply unit or research chit?? even though the AAr's might look similar i thin k only most gamers beta testers try to down the soviets in sp or su 1941 and head south as japanese in fa 1941.

hope this helps. it is a major advancement over Axis and Allies let me tell you. i like that game but it was not enough "squad leader complexity" for my long term playing -this on e is.

john
"the willow branch but bends beneath the snow"
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's World at War”