Shame at Wake

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
Jack Meauph
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 2:30 am

Shame at Wake

Post by Jack Meauph »

I'm playing as the Japanese vs the AI in scenario 15. Historical first turn.

Wake is in the process of fighting off my third attack. The NLF that lands on day 1 was annihilated. I sent two more NLFs, who landed and promptly had all their squads become disorganized. They didn't look like they were going to get the job done so I diverted the South Seas Detachment, along with more cruisers for shore bombardment.

After three days of shock attacks and heavy bombardment, Wake's defenders still fight on.

Question: with this situation would it be better to switch to deliberate attacks? Shock attacks don't seem to be working.
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by castor troy »

I thought you can only shock attack when attacking an atoll?!?[&:]
User avatar
2ndACR
Posts: 5524
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 7:32 am
Location: Irving,Tx

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by 2ndACR »

I have always managed to take Wake on turn 1. Take the bombardment group assigned to the Guam landings and reassign it to Wake.

If I try for Wake without that bombardment group, some times I can not take it. By using it, I have 100% of the time taken Wake on day 1.
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by tsimmonds »

Wake, is an atoll. You have no choice; on the turn you land, you will shock attack. After that, you can change it (I think). After three days of making shock attacks, South Seas Detachment may be blown. Deliberate assaults are probably better for this situation. If you let them rest for a few days they may recover enough from disruption/fatigue/disablement to try again. Hitting the defenders with both naval and air bombardment on the first turn of your new assault will likely help a great deal.

It takes landing two or three of those NLFs from Kwaj together on Wake at the start to insure success.
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by Feinder »

Prep-Points (future objective) can make a BIG difference. Consider it a multiplier (altho it's probably not exactly as I describe).

If you have an LCU with assault str of 100..
Sort of like Prep-Points 0 = +0% assault value. Assault value remains at 100.
Prep-Points 20 = +20% assault value. Assault value increases to 120 (if you attack the hex that is your objective).

I'm sure it's not that clean cut, but it's -is- something like that.

A lot of folks are in a rush to conquer the Pacific my February. Take you time. Rest. Reduce that fatigue. Get that moral back up. Accumulate some prep-points. Bomb/Shell the hell out of 'em, they're not going anywhere.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
moses
Posts: 2252
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 3:39 am

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by moses »

I waited a week and had a couple BB's bombard wake for 3 days. My tranports then landed without a single ship being hit by coastal guns. Wake fell easily a day later. A side benifit is that day one invasions are vulnerable to US carriers which raid Wake while KB is at PH.

Speed kills. Take a little more time whenever possible.
janushm
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:15 am
Location: 's-Hertogenbosch, netherlands
Contact:

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by janushm »

i didnt land at wake in a pbem...waited till the KB was free and rearmed again..sendt a bombardment force with 2 BB's a CL and 4DD's..pounded em for a couple of days under the umbrella of hiriyu, zuikayu and akagi...enemy CV's attacked and sank the saratoga without a single american coming trough my CAP...landed the south seas detachment en the following day [december 24th] wake was mine...
the escalated quickly...
User avatar
PeteG662
Posts: 1263
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:01 pm

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by PeteG662 »

Don't forget you have some engineers available as well which is a combat multiplier so load one of the engineers at Kwaj up with one extra NLF and away you go.
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by Onime No Kyo »

Yeah,

I found that taking atolls is a very tricky thing to do. I had an entire division become "disorganized" and promptly destroyed after 3 days of back and forth shock attacks on Kwajelein in the '43 scenario. I think the trick is to get at least 2x the manpower you need to stuff into the initial beachhead so that not every single squad is critical. The cold-blooded bastard that I am, it is becoming part of my SOP to land a destoyer-load of troops first, just to see what I'm up against before I commit.
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
byron13
Posts: 1594
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by byron13 »

Gee, Onime, you're such a cold-blooded bastard!
Image
User avatar
RUPD3658
Posts: 6921
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:25 am
Location: East Brunswick, NJ

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by RUPD3658 »

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

Yeah,

I found that taking atolls is a very tricky thing to do. I had an entire division become "disorganized" and promptly destroyed after 3 days of back and forth shock attacks on Kwajelein in the '43 scenario. I think the trick is to get at least 2x the manpower you need to stuff into the initial beachhead so that not every single squad is critical. The cold-blooded bastard that I am, it is becoming part of my SOP to land a destoyer-load of troops first, just to see what I'm up against before I commit.

Even better is sub transported units. Recon by fire with less ship and LCU losses.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
Chaplain
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 10:13 pm

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by Chaplain »

ORIGINAL: RUPD3658
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

Yeah,

I found that taking atolls is a very tricky thing to do. I had an entire division become "disorganized" and promptly destroyed after 3 days of back and forth shock attacks on Kwajelein in the '43 scenario. I think the trick is to get at least 2x the manpower you need to stuff into the initial beachhead so that not every single squad is critical. The cold-blooded bastard that I am, it is becoming part of my SOP to land a destoyer-load of troops first, just to see what I'm up against before I commit.

Even better is sub transported units. Recon by fire with less ship and LCU losses.

Ack! You ought to lose major VP's and/or PP's for such a thing. You ought to be court-martialed! I know it's impossible to implement a punishment for this kind of thing ... but I wish there was a way. Sheesh! [8|]
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by Onime No Kyo »

ORIGINAL: Chaplain
ORIGINAL: RUPD3658
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

Yeah,

I found that taking atolls is a very tricky thing to do. I had an entire division become "disorganized" and promptly destroyed after 3 days of back and forth shock attacks on Kwajelein in the '43 scenario. I think the trick is to get at least 2x the manpower you need to stuff into the initial beachhead so that not every single squad is critical. The cold-blooded bastard that I am, it is becoming part of my SOP to land a destoyer-load of troops first, just to see what I'm up against before I commit.

Even better is sub transported units. Recon by fire with less ship and LCU losses.

Ack! You ought to lose major VP's and/or PP's for such a thing. You ought to be court-martialed! I know it's impossible to implement a punishment for this kind of thing ... but I wish there was a way. Sheesh! [8|]

Well, I think its only fair. This game doesnt model commando raids or UDT ops. In short, there is no way to sneak a small recon force onto an atoll. This seems like a good compromise to me. Look at it as a small commando operation that always goes wrong. [:)]
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 4973
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

RE: Shame at Wake

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

ORIGINAL: Jack Meauph

I'm playing as the Japanese vs the AI in scenario 15. Historical first turn.

Wake is in the process of fighting off my third attack. The NLF that lands on day 1 was annihilated. I sent two more NLFs, who landed and promptly had all their squads become disorganized. They didn't look like they were going to get the job done so I diverted the South Seas Detachment, along with more cruisers for shore bombardment.

After three days of shock attacks and heavy bombardment, Wake's defenders still fight on.

"Send more Japs!" [:D]
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”